[Lnc-business] FB Posts
Arvin Vohra
votevohra at gmail.com
Sat Apr 15 16:00:12 EDT 2017
I would also want to be a part of that
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <carynannharlos at gmail.com>
wrote:
> I would really like to work with you all in crafting an analysis committee
> with well-thought out proposals for August.
>
> *Something needs to change. *I think everyone agrees on that.
>
> I wish emotions didn't get so high- I think ultimately we want the same
> thing. And have the same very deep concerns.
>
> -Caryn Ann
>
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Patrick McKnight <
> patrick.joseph.mcknight at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Whitney,
>>
>> I agree with your sentiments. I'm slightly more inclined to take action
>> now but everything you say is true.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Patrick McKnight
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Whitney Bilyeu <whitneycb76 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> My issues are with the (perceived) 'authority' that volunteers have over
>>> our messaging on FB. Also, I don't care to burden staff members with a task
>>> that is not necessarily their specialty.
>>>
>>> I value the contributions and the creativity of the volunteers who put
>>> that material out, and I believe they do it better than our limited staff
>>> could do. However, I do not agree that volunteers should have the final say
>>> when it comes messages that we LNC members are on the hook for.
>>>
>>> The motion presented today was too restrictive, and oddly, at the same
>>> time a little ambiguous. It could have put our entire social media presence
>>> on hold. I am also concerned about the risk of losing those volunteers as a
>>> result of such an action.
>>>
>>> Yes, we need an intervention, and a temporary policy, along with a
>>> steering committee, could be the answer. But, we could have just brought
>>> our social media action to a screeching halt, and that is not what we
>>> really want.
>>>
>>> How about establishing a policy that includes staff or LNC members in
>>> posting approval, and holds the APRC more accountable, as well?
>>>
>>> I want to see a policy that establishes/clarifies the authority of the
>>> FB admins, moderators, and posters (who are not staff members). I also
>>> would like to establish specific guidelines for what is put out...in order
>>> to avoid these kinds of pitfalls and distractions in the future. Ideally,
>>> we won't put anything out there that causes people to resign their posts,
>>> or cease donations.
>>>
>>> Whitney
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *In Liberty,*
> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
> <http://www.lpcolorado.org>
> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> *We defend your rights*
> *And oppose the use of force*
> *Taxation is theft*
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
--
Arvin Vohra
www.VoteVohra.com
VoteVohra at gmail.com
(301) 320-3634
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20170415/61bd3101/attachment-0005.html>
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list