[Lnc-business] LNC Emails for Sub Committee Members

Joshua Katz planning4liberty at gmail.com
Fri Dec 22 09:57:27 EST 2017


One solution to the concerns Starchild raised is to use a job-title "real"
email as described, and then a forwarder to person's name @ lp, which they
can log into on the site or forward to their own email (as I've done with
my LNC email).  That way you keep all the archives together, but they also
show, historically, who sent and received each email, and anyone who
communicates with that person sees their name on the email address - say a
person doesn't know who to contact, so they write to "convention
committee."  They then receive back an email with a person's name on it,
and conduct further communications with that person.  You can even assign
forwarders like this to more than one person on the same underlying email,
although that might be a little frustrating for the people who receive all
the one-sided messages.  One advantage of this is that you never have to
give people the "keys" to the underlying email box, and so, when that
person leaves or is terminated, they can no longer send from their email
address.  I can still send from several non-existent email addresses for
past employers, since they didn't get rid of the email box when I left just
removed my access to it, which is probably less than ideal.

Joshua A. Katz


On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org>
wrote:

> Elizabeth we do that in Colorado which is where I got the idea. For
> instance my LPCO email is communicationsdirector at lpcolorado.org - and
> that email gets pass along to the next officer holding the position with
> all of its archives etc.  It is really really helpful.  I am a big fan of
> the idea.  I think about 25% of state affiliates do it that way.
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Elizabeth Van Horn <
> elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Starchild for the welcome and kind words!  : )
>>
>> ---
>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>> LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
>> Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
>> Chair-LP Social Media Process Review Committee
>> Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
>> http://www.lpcaucus.org/
>>
>>
>> On 2017-12-21 22:58, Starchild wrote:
>>
>>
>> Me too! But the persons currently receiving emails sent to those
>> addresses should still be identified by name. Nothing says "big faceless
>> institution" like not knowing who you are actually talking with when you
>> contact an organization.
>>
>> By the way Elizabeth, allow me to offer you a belated welcome to the LNC!
>> I was experiencing email difficulties and behind on my messages when you
>> first came on, due to both travel and new email system glitches, but I see
>> you've jumped right in on discussion, which is great.   :-)
>>
>> Love & Liberty,
>>
>>                                    ((( starchild )))
>> At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>>                         RealReform at earthlink.net
>>                                 (415) 625-FREE
>>
>>
>> On Dec 21, 2017, at 7:44 PM, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
>>
>> Caryn Ann, the idea of having an LP-email that's attached to a committee
>> is really good.  It creates a fixed point of contact, gives the exchange
>> the proper official LP business gravitas, and as you mentioned, eliminates
>> the changing members situation.  I like it.
>>
>> ~Elizabeth Van Horn
>>
>> On 2017-12-21 22:22, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>>
>> For the HPC we have set up lpedia at lp.org so it could be a permanent
>> contact and not dependent on changing committee members
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 7:39 PM Elizabeth Van Horn <
>> elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel Hayes's idea is good.  Sean O'Toole's idea is also good.
>>>
>>> Some of the LP committees interact with people, businesses, and media,
>>> outside of the internal LP circle.  Also, some of the committees interact
>>> with state affiliates in the capacity of official business, and that may
>>> warrant an official LP-email.  Both of the committees that Daniel Hayes
>>> chairs probably classify for having LP-emails.  (Affiliate Support
>>> Committee & Convention Oversight Committee)
>>>
>>> Another committee that has, and may in the future, interact with
>>> organizations or media outside the LP is the Historic committee.
>>> (Historical Preservation Committee)
>>>
>>> The Candidate Support Committee may also be a committee that would be
>>> well served with it's members having an LP-email.
>>>
>>> To recap:  I can see reasons for the following committees to have access
>>> to an LP-email:
>>>
>>> Affiliate Support Committee
>>> Convention Oversight Committee)
>>> Historical Preservation Committee
>>> Candidate Support Committee
>>>
>>> Possibly, the Ballot Access Committee too.  If they're involved with
>>> contracting to outside people and/or groups.
>>> ---
>>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>> LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
>>> Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
>>> Chair-LP Social Media Process Review Committee
>>> Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
>>> http://www.lpcaucus.org/
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2017-12-20 20:37, Sean O'Toole wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> We have the capacity to handle this but before I go ahead and do it, I'd
>>> like to have some sort of policy in place as to who should and should not
>>> have an official address. With the input of the LNC and staff, I'd be happy
>>> to put a policy together on behalf of the IT Committee as it probably isn't
>>> something that needs to rise to the level of an LNC decision.
>>>
>>> Sean
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sean O'Toole
>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>> sean.otoole at lp.org
>>> (816) 739-2737
>>>
>>> On December 20, 2017 at 6:18:24 PM, Daniel Hayes (daniel.hayes at lp.org)
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> It's something I have been pondering and one of my committee members
>>> asked about today, that being having an official LP address assigned to
>>> them. If they are doing work on the part of the Party it would make some
>>> sense for them to have that more official email to use. It also might
>>> smooth things out with our lists in some cases.
>>>
>>> What are your opinions on this?
>>>
>>> Daniel Hayes
>>> LNC At Large Member
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20171222/b4d30077/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Lnc-business mailing list