[Lnc-business] Caryn Ann Harlos fundraising and membership recruitment
Daniel Hayes
daniel.hayes at lp.org
Fri Feb 23 22:27:13 EST 2018
Caryn Ann,
It was mentioned to you by Wes. I was in on the conversation because you and I are the two most active fundraisers and membership recruiters on the board. Was that in NOLA or Kansas City?
Wes wanted to experiment with it. This stuff all gets disclosed in the Treasurer’s report.
Hopefully, other board members take a more active role in fund raising going forward. This discussion has been much longer than it needed to be and much less civil than required.
Now that it’s revealed that I was “involved” that should explain it. This shall be placed with all my other crimes, including refusing to re-Life Harambe and have him speak at the NatCon.
I get peoples issue with it, but I was there and understand Wes’s perspective and agreed with it. I’m more concerned with results. We have an all too regular habit of tying our shoe’s laces together. We get lost in the minutia.
Daniel Hayes
LNC At Large Member
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 23, 2018, at 6:13 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>
> Actually this board does know me. I have served nearly a full term
> with them. Your predecessors knew me well. And this idea for
> fundraising was put in motion before you were on the LNC. In fact - I
> think it WAS mentioned at last LNC meeting during a break time about
> innovative fundraising. I could be wrong but I think Wes did mention
> it (he would know that better than I) It could only be executed once
> conventions started. My nonexistent crystal ball didn’t forsee that
> Regions would be vacated and some would think that I had to prove
> myself to them anew.
> I earned my reputation for integrity with my peers.
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 5:03 PM Caryn Ann Harlos
> <[1]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>
> Elizabeth that individual claimed it was. A lot of people were ready to
> assume that was true. I was not because I know you and others did not.
> There is nothing more to say on the exchange here. You think it was
> perfectly appropriate and I don’t. More digital ink will not change
> that.
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 4:54 PM Caryn Ann Harlos
> <[2]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>
> If you found it odd or now disturbing directly asking rather than
> openly “wondering” or “hoping” is the correct manner.
>
> I followed our policy. I openly discussed this on FB. It is in every
> financial report.
>
> It would have been in my report to the LNC in April.
>
> There was no lack of transparency that I saw. I told the members at
> each convention that my trip was paid. Fundraising is under the
> direction of the ED and I followed that.
>
> Getting a piece of equipment somewhere to do a job is not some unusual
> thing. My time was donated. The expense to move my body (the
> equipment) to do a volunteer job to benefit the Party is part of
> fundraising.
>
> And you end with another insinuation that it’s my fault. It doesn’t
> end does it.
>
> So I’ll end it. I’ve said what I wish to on that “question” of my “odd
> and disturbing” innocent volunteering offer. I trust that answers your
> question on that front.
>
> -Caryn Ann
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 4:44 PM Caryn Ann Harlos
> <[3]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>
> And if it is spleen venting time well good. I step forward to every
> challenge I can. Staff knows they can call me at any time with an
> emergency and I will move heaven and earth to accomplish it. If staff
> called me today and said hey a big donor is in [wherever] tomorrow can
> you meet them and do a ask I would be on a plane to do it.
> My work ethic and integrity are something I rightfully earned.
> There is nothing that was done outside of our rules. If the LNC
> believes a directive or Policy Manual change is needed they should do
> it.
> But I will fight back against any untoward comment about my propriety.
>
> -Caryn Ann
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 4:37 PM Caryn Ann Harlos
> <[4]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>
> I expect now every fundraising expense of the Chair to have to be voted
> on which is the absolutely ridiculous level of micromanagement we
> wallow in.
>
> We have an ED who is tasked with growing funds m. We said last meeting
> that these brief experiments in new methods are the way to test. He
> followed through on that with one that frankly was a success.
>
> I would have signed up 100 more members (that was my goal) this
> season. We strain out flies, swallow camels, and disrespect the
> intentions of our peers instead.
>
> I followed procedure and the Policy Manual. I don’t have a crystal
> ball to know in advance who would find that insufficient.
>
> -Caryn Ann
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 4:30 PM Caryn Ann Harlos
> <[5]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>
> I’m not going to devolve into those arguments. It was an inappropriate
> insinuation. Which you just followed with another one.
> I followed protocol as I understood it. This was in the discretion of
> the ED. The Chair and Treasurer approves. Staff was openly
> coordinating with me. There was absolutely nothing that would have
> anticipated this to me as the day to day managers of the Party
> approved.
> I think that is pretty obvious considering my angst about pennies on
> steemit.
> A few weeks ago I had a concern with something said that could involve
> you that was disturbing. I asked you directly and it confirmed my
> judgment of you that you wouldn’t condone.
> You suggested I would have my platcomm expenses paid while povertaruans
> suffered. That is inappropriate but I can’t make you see that if you
> don’t and I won’t spend further time trying. A comment of mine about
> donating a weekend if I was going to be there anyway (not odd at all )
> was twisted into something “disturbing” - couching it with “I wonder”
> doesn’t change that fact.
> That was a low comment. If it were made to you you would be requesting
> me to call it out. And I frankly would.
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 4:16 PM Elizabeth Van Horn
> <[6]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
>
> I didn't insinuate, I asked a direct question. As for the courtesy
> of a
> direct inquiry, I suggest that all of this could have been avoided,
> with
> the courtesy of direct communications with this board.
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
>> On 2018-02-23 18:02, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>> Like usual - I omitted a “no” - Joshua there is no moving forward
> at
>> least with my volunteering on this. I will decline.
>> I will do things on my own as I have done. Less effectively
> and
>> less
>> often but more peacefully.
>> My integrity is my highest possession and to have an
> insinuation
>> stated
>> by a peer without even the courtesy of a direct inquiry is my
> cutoff
>> point.
>> It is said Libertarians have trouble accomplishing things and
> eat
>> their
>> own.
>> QED.
>> I never thought I would regret my recruiting success. The LP
> has
>> surprised me once again.
>> -Caryn Ann
>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 3:49 PM Elizabeth Van Horn
>> <[1][7]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
>>
>> Well, Caryn Ann, it's you who have used the word sinister,
> not I.
>> You wrote:
>> " My comment was simply and only how I would spend my time.
> Which
>> I
>> do
>> at every event."
>> In which case, you can do without being reimbursed, by the
>> national
>> LP.
>> Glad we're in agreement.
>> ---
>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>> On 2018-02-23 17:10, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>>> Elizabeth I am shocked frankly at an ability to read
> something
>> sinister
>>> but not everything.
>>> My comment to the Platform Committee had ZERO intentions
> of
>> that.
>>> I have already clearly stated here that recruitment
> trips are
>> just
>>> that
>>> and nothing more. My comment was simply and only how I
> would
>> spend
>>> my
>>> time. Which I do at every event.
>>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 2:54 PM Joshua Katz
>>> <[1][2][8]planning4liberty at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I agree with most of Ms. Van Horn's points,
> although I'd
>>> emphasize that
>>> my issue is more about disclosure of potential
> issues to
>> the
>>> board
>>> ahead of time and the potential fiduciary issues I
> see
>> here. I
>>> explained some, I can find more. The solution to
> that
>> is,
>> in
>>> the
>>> future, disclosure to the board of transactions
>> involving
>> LNC
>>> members,
>>> and the orientation I mentioned earlier. Anyway, I
> am
>> writing
>>> to
>>> express disagreement with one point: I almost
> always
>> disagree
>>> with
>>> clawbacks or requested clawbacks absent actual
>> malfeasance. I
>>> would
>>> disagree with requesting the return of funds or
> stopping
>> funds
>>> in
>>> progress.
>>> Joshua A. Katz
>>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 3:21 PM, Elizabeth Van Horn
>>> <[1][2][3][9]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
>>> Wes, here's my feedback, and I don't mind saying
> that
>> I
>> was
>>> shocked
>>> to read that an LNC member is being reimbursed to
>> attend
>>> state
>>> conventions within their own region.
>>> Dear LNC,
>>> Caryn Ann Harlos has recruited a lot of
>> dues-paying
>>> members by
>>> attending state conventions and getting
> people to
>> join
>>> or
>>> renew.
>>> At first, she did this at state conventions
> she
>> was
>>> attending
>>> in her
>>> region at her own expense.
>>> I've no problem with this. LNC representatives
> often
>> attend
>>> state
>>> conventions within their own region, and if she
> works
>> to
>>> boost
>>> national membership while there, that's cool.<<<
>>> Her results were so strong that I asked her
> if
>> she
>> would
>>> be
>>> willing
>>> to go to some other states outside of her
> region
>> to
>> do
>>> similar
>>> fundraising efforts if her travel expenses
> were
>>> reimbursed.
>>> < This is something that should have been told to
> the
>> LNC,
>>> and
>>> even
>>> discussed. Why are we only finding this out,
> after
>> someone
>>> inquired? Where's the transparency?<<<
>>> We have been struggling to keep membership
> from
>> falling.
>>> We
>>> send
>>> renewal emails and renewal letters that
> perform
>>> reasonably
>>> well
>>> but
>>> pretty much exhaust that method. Other
> methods we
>> try
>>> have
>>> very
>>> low
>>> ROI. Caryn Ann's ROI has been comparatively
>> strong.
>>> Caryn Ann attended the Washington State
>> convention
>> last
>>> weekend
>>> and
>>> recruited 18 to 20 dues-paying members for
> the
>> national
>>> LP.
>>> That trip is one in which we have reimbursed
> her
>> for her
>>> travel.
>>> I have a problem with this. Many LNC Regional
>>> Representatives
>>> will attend state conventions within their
> region. If
>> any of
>>> them
>>> do membership recruiting for national while
> there,
>> that's
>>> something
>>> they choose to do. Are you suggesting that Caryn
> Ann
>>> wouldn't
>>> have
>>> tried to boost membership at a state convention
> within
>> her
>>> region,
>>> if she wasn't reimbursed? Because, I doubt that.
>> This
>> was
>>> something she was doing as she chose to do, while
>> attending
>>> conventions within her own region. This isn't
>> something
>> that
>>> an
>>> LNC
>>> member should be reimbursed for. <<<
>>> I'd like to send Caryn Ann to more state
>> conventions to
>>> have
>>> her do
>>> this work. No one else has done this as
>> successfully as
>>> Caryn
>>> Ann.
>>> Caryn Ann is a volunteer so we don't pay her
> for
>> her
>>> time.
>>> Wes, you don't know what others have done
> regarding
>>> recruiting,
>>> as
>>> most people do it as a normal part of being in
> the LP.
>> I,
>>> nor
>>> most
>>> others, keep a log of the people we've gotten to
> join
>> the LP,
>>> as I
>>> see it as a given this is done.<<<
>>> Wes, do you know why my own state affiliate has
> let
>> national
>>> membership drop? Because, they're unhappy with
> the
>> national
>>> LP. At
>>> my last state convention, our officers said that
> they
>> want
>>> people to
>>> keep state memberships current, but national
> doesn't
>> do
>>> anything for
>>> them, so they don't care much about that. I had
> to
>> mention
>>> that our
>>> delegate count is tied to national membership,
> and
>> since
>>> then,
>>> I
>>> followed -up on that, but our numbers still have
>> dropped.
>>> I've
>>> been
>>> thinking of a way to reverse that, but if LPIN is
>> successful
>>> in
>>> reversing that trend, it's because our volunteers
> are
>>> passionate
>>> about the LP and liberty actions. Not because
> anyone
>> is
>>> being
>>> reimbursed for the expenses of travel and time.
> (My
>> state
>>> isn't the
>>> only one that feels this way, btw)<<<
>>> For conventions that Caryn Ann is unable to
> take
>> the
>>> time
>>> to
>>> attend,
>>> I will be sending our staff member Jess
> Mears.
>> The
>> thing
>>> with
>>> Jess
>>> is that we pay her for her hours to travel,
>> attend,
>> and
>>> return
>>> from
>>> state conventions. She's unlikely to get as
> high
>> of
>> a
>>> ROI.
>>> I personally wouldn't send anyone to state
>> conventions
>> to
>>> boost
>>> national membership, if the national LP is paying
> for
>> it.
>>> Instead,
>>> we should work to create a better LP that's
> responsive
>> to
>>> it's
>>> members and the public, and we grow through
> people
>> seeking to
>>> join
>>> us. Organic growth.<<<
>>> I received a complaint today that it is
>> inappropriate
>>> for
>>> someone
>>> running for a position on the LNC to have
> travel
>>> reimbursed.
>>> I sympathize with the complaint, but do not
> think
>> it's a
>>> violation
>>> of our policies.
>>> It's a matter of principal. Byreimbursing Caryn
> Ann
>> Harlos
>>> for
>>> traveling to state conventions within her own
> region,
>> the LP
>>> is
>>> subsidizing her efforts as a regional
> representative.
>> This is
>>> inappropriate.<<<
>>> Nevertheless, I bring this up to the LNC for
> your
>>> feedback. If
>>> you
>>> request a stop to sending Caryn Ann Harlos
> or any
>> other
>>> LNC
>>> member
>>> to state conventions for the purpose of
>> recruiting
>>> dues-paying
>>> members, we can end the program.
>>> Yes, I'm requesting a stop to reimbursing LNC
> members
>> for
>>> travel to
>>> state conventions within their own region. I
> also am
>>> requesting
>>> that Caryn Ann repay the LP for the reimbursement
>> costs
>> of
>>> any
>>> state
>>> conventions she attended within her region.
>>> As for "sending her" to other state conventions,
> this
>> should
>>> be
>>> discussed by the LNC.<<<
>>> A reasonable question might be, "I'm willing
> to
>> go
>> to
>>> state
>>> convention at the expense of the LNC and
> recruit
>>> members--why
>>> don't
>>> you send me?" The answer is that Caryn Ann
> proved
>> her
>>> willingness
>>> and capability within her own region. No
> other
>> LNC
>>> members
>>> have
>>> mailed us several envelopes of dues-paying
>> members
>> from
>>> their
>>> states. Caryn Ann and Jess Mears together
> are not
>> able
>>> to
>>> attend
>>> every state convention. If you are
> interested in
>>> helping,
>>> and
>>> willing to prove your ability first at a
> state in
>> your
>>> region
>>> or at
>>> another state at your own expense, let me
> know
>> and
>> we
>>> might be
>>> able
>>> to try that. And then we can report the
> results.
>>> Wes, I know a woman who renewed her membership
> due to
>> a
>> FB
>>> post
>>> that Andy Craig made. (She publicly wrote that
> he's
>> the
>>> reason
>>> she
>>> renewed) I'd wager that Andy is responsible for
>> quite
>> a
>>> number of
>>> people renewing or joining the LP. As Andy's an
>> excellent
>>> advocate
>>> for the cause that is the LP. If you want to
> find
>> someone
>>> who's out
>>> there building up hope in the LP, and getting
> people
>> on
>>> board,
>>> he's
>>> the one. You probably don't know this stuff, as
> Andy
>> doesn't
>>> seek
>>> to be recognized for his efforts, he probably
> sees it
>> as
>>> normal
>>> for
>>> people who support the LP.
>>> Nor, do I know of others within the LP who keep
> track
>> of
>> how
>>> many
>>> people they've recruited. So, your statement
> asking
>> people
>>> to
>>> "prove your ability", is moot.<<<
>>> (truncated)
>>> ---
>>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>> On 2018-02-22 22:56, Wes Benedict wrote:
>>> Dear LNC,
>>> Caryn Ann Harlos has recruited a lot of
>> dues-paying
>>> members by
>>> attending state conventions and getting
> people to
>> join
>>> or
>>> renew.
>>> At first, she did this at state conventions
> she
>> was
>>> attending
>>> in her
>>> region at her own expense.
>>> Her results were so strong that I asked her
> if
>> she
>> would
>>> be
>>> willing
>>> to go to some other states outside of her
> region
>> to
>> do
>>> similar
>>> fundraising efforts if her travel expenses
> were
>>> reimbursed.
>>> We have been struggling to keep membership
> from
>> falling.
>>> We
>>> send
>>> renewal emails and renewal letters that
> perform
>>> reasonably
>>> well
>>> but
>>> pretty much exhaust that method. Other
> methods we
>> try
>>> have
>>> very
>>> low
>>> ROI. Caryn Ann's ROI has been comparatively
>> strong.
>>> Caryn Ann attended the Washington State
>> convention
>> last
>>> weekend
>>> and
>>> recruited 18 to 20 dues-paying members for
> the
>> national
>>> LP.
>>> That trip is one in which we have reimbursed
> her
>> for her
>>> travel.
>>> I'd like to send Caryn Ann to more state
>> conventions to
>>> have
>>> her do
>>> this work. No one else has done this as
>> successfully as
>>> Caryn
>>> Ann.
>>> Caryn Ann is a volunteer so we don't pay her
> for
>> her
>>> time.
>>> For conventions that Caryn Ann is unable to
> take
>> the
>>> time
>>> to
>>> attend,
>>> I will be sending our staff member Jess
> Mears.
>> The
>> thing
>>> with
>>> Jess
>>> is that we pay her for her hours to travel,
>> attend,
>> and
>>> return
>>> from
>>> state conventions. She's unlikely to get as
> high
>> of
>> a
>>> ROI.
>>> I received a complaint today that it is
>> inappropriate
>>> for
>>> someone
>>> running for a position on the LNC to have
> travel
>>> reimbursed.
>>> I sympathize with the complaint, but do not
> think
>> it's a
>>> violation
>>> of our policies.
>>> Nevertheless, I bring this up to the LNC for
> your
>>> feedback. If
>>> you
>>> request a stop to sending Caryn Ann Harlos
> or any
>> other
>>> LNC
>>> member
>>> to state conventions for the purpose of
>> recruiting
>>> dues-paying
>>> members, we can end the program.
>>> A reasonable question might be, "I'm willing
> to
>> go
>> to
>>> state
>>> convention at the expense of the LNC and
> recruit
>>> members--why
>>> don't
>>> you send me?" The answer is that Caryn Ann
> proved
>> her
>>> willingness
>>> and capability within her own region. No
> other
>> LNC
>>> members
>>> have
>>> mailed us several envelopes of dues-paying
>> members
>> from
>>> their
>>> states. Cary[2]n Ann and Jess Mears together
> are
>> not
>>> able
>>> to
>>> attend
>>> every state convention. If you are
> interested in
>>> helping,
>>> and
>>> willing to prove your ability first at a
> state in
>> your
>>> region
>>> or at
>>> another state at your own expense, let me
> know
>> and
>> we
>>> might be
>>> able
>>> to try that. And then we can report the
> results.
>>> Below is a report from Robert Kraus with
> some of
>> the
>>> fundraising
>>> results from Caryn Ann.
>>> I welcome your feedback.
>>> Wes Benedict, Executive Director
>>> Libertarian National Committee, Inc.
>>> 1444 Duke St., Alexandria, VA 22314
>>> [3](202) 333-0008 ext. 232,
>> [1][4][3][4][10]wes.benedict at lp.org
>>> [2][5][4][5][11]facebook.com/libertarians
> @LPNational
>>> Join the Libertarian Party at:
>>> [3][6][5][6][12]http://lp.org/membership
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject: Harlos Fundraising
>>> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 11:27:47 -0500
>>> From: Robert S. Kraus
>> [4]<[7][6][7][13]robert.kraus at lp.org>
>>> To: Wes Benedict
>> [5]<[8][7][8][14]wes.benedict at lp.org>
>>> I have [9]Harlos pegged as solicitor for a total
> of
>> $2,335.00
>>> for 82
>>> members 49 of which where new (these 82 folks
> have
>> also
>>> contributed
>>> a
>>> net total excluding conv related gifts of
> $6,261.74
>> since
>>> 2016
>>> convention - bunch of them to Hist Preservation
> of
>> course so
>>> she has
>>> her
>>> fans)
>>> In addition she is likely 95% responsible for the
>> $12,120
>>> raised for
>>> Historic Preservation
>>> Finally she has given $2181 herself since the
> 2016
>> convention
>>> (non
>>> convention related - however $1525 was for Hist
>> Preservation)
>>> --
>>> Robert S. Kraus - Operations Director
>>> [6]Operations at LP.org
>>> Libertarian National Committee, Inc.
>>> 1444 Duke Street
>>> Alexandria, VA 22314
>>> Ph: [10]202.333.0008 x 231
>>> References
>>> 1. mailto:[11][8][9][15]wes.benedict at lp.org
>>> 2.
> [12][9][10][16]http://facebook.com/libertarians
>>> 3. [13][10][11][17]http://lp.org/membership
>>> 4. mailto:[14][11][12][18]robert.kraus at lp.org
>>> 5. mailto:[15][12][13][19]wes.benedict at lp.org
>>> 6. mailto:[16]Operations at LP.org
>>> References
>>> 1. mailto:[13][14][20]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
>>> 2.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> [14][15][21]https://maps.google.com/?q=n+Ann+and+Jess+Mears+together
> +are
>> +n&e
>>> ntry=gmail&source=g
>>> 3. tel:(202) 333-0008 ext. 232
>>> 4. mailto:[15][16][22]wes.benedict at lp.org
>>> 5. [16][17][23]http://facebook.com/libertarians
>>> 6. [17][18][24]http://lp.org/membership
>>> 7. mailto:[18][19][25]robert.kraus at lp.org
>>> 8. mailto:[19][20][26]wes.benedict at lp.org
>>> 9.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> [20][21][27]https://maps.google.com/?q=Harlos+pegged+as+solicitor+fo
> r+a+
>> tota
>>> l+of+$2,33&entry=gmail&source=g
>>> 10. tel:202.333.0008 x 231
>>> 11. mailto:[21][22][28]wes.benedict at lp.org
>>> 12. [22][23][29]http://facebook.com/libertarians
>>> 13. [23][24][30]http://lp.org/membership
>>> 14. mailto:[24][25][31]robert.kraus at lp.org
>>> 15. mailto:[25][26][32]wes.benedict at lp.org
>>> 16. mailto:[26]Operations at LP.org
>>>
>>> References
>>>
>>> 1. mailto:[27][33]planning4liberty at gmail.com
>>> 2. mailto:[28][34]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
>>> 3. mailto:[29][35]wes.benedict at lp.org
>>> 4. [30][36]http://facebook.com/libertarians
>>> 5. [31][37]http://lp.org/membership
>>> 6. mailto:[32][38]robert.kraus at lp.org
>>> 7. mailto:[33][39]wes.benedict at lp.org
>>> 8. mailto:[34][40]wes.benedict at lp.org
>>> 9. [35][41]http://facebook.com/libertarians
>>> 10. [36][42]http://lp.org/membership
>>> 11. mailto:[37][43]robert.kraus at lp.org
>>> 12. mailto:[38][44]wes.benedict at lp.org
>>> 13. mailto:[39][45]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
>>> 14.
>>>
>>
>>
> [40][46]https://maps.google.com/?q=n+Ann+and+Jess+Mears+together+are
> +n&e
>> ntry=gmail&source=g
>>> 15. mailto:[41][47]wes.benedict at lp.org
>>> 16. [42][48]http://facebook.com/libertarians
>>> 17. [43][49]http://lp.org/membership
>>> 18. mailto:[44][50]robert.kraus at lp.org
>>> 19. mailto:[45][51]wes.benedict at lp.org
>>> 20.
>>>
>>
>>
> [46][52]https://maps.google.com/?q=Harlos+pegged+as+solicitor+for+a+
> tota
>> l+of+$2,33&entry=gmail&source=g
>>> 21. mailto:[47][53]wes.benedict at lp.org
>>> 22. [48][54]http://facebook.com/libertarians
>>> 23. [49][55]http://lp.org/membership
>>> 24. mailto:[50][56]robert.kraus at lp.org
>>> 25. mailto:[51][57]wes.benedict at lp.org
>>> 26. mailto:[52]Operations at LP.org
>>
>> References
>>
>> 1. mailto:[58]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
>> 2. mailto:[59]planning4liberty at gmail.com
>> 3. mailto:[60]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
>> 4. mailto:[61]wes.benedict at lp.org
>> 5. [62]http://facebook.com/libertarians
>> 6. [63]http://lp.org/membership
>> 7. mailto:[64]robert.kraus at lp.org
>> 8. mailto:[65]wes.benedict at lp.org
>> 9. mailto:[66]wes.benedict at lp.org
>> 10. [67]http://facebook.com/libertarians
>> 11. [68]http://lp.org/membership
>> 12. mailto:[69]robert.kraus at lp.org
>> 13. mailto:[70]wes.benedict at lp.org
>> 14. mailto:[71]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
>> 15.
> [72]https://maps.google.com/?q=n+Ann+and+Jess+Mears+together+are+n&e
>> 16. mailto:[73]wes.benedict at lp.org
>> 17. [74]http://facebook.com/libertarians
>> 18. [75]http://lp.org/membership
>> 19. mailto:[76]robert.kraus at lp.org
>> 20. mailto:[77]wes.benedict at lp.org
>> 21.
> [78]https://maps.google.com/?q=Harlos+pegged+as+solicitor+for+a+tota
>> 22. mailto:[79]wes.benedict at lp.org
>> 23. [80]http://facebook.com/libertarians
>> 24. [81]http://lp.org/membership
>> 25. mailto:[82]robert.kraus at lp.org
>> 26. mailto:[83]wes.benedict at lp.org
>> 27. mailto:[84]planning4liberty at gmail.com
>> 28. mailto:[85]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
>> 29. mailto:[86]wes.benedict at lp.org
>> 30. [87]http://facebook.com/libertarians
>> 31. [88]http://lp.org/membership
>> 32. mailto:[89]robert.kraus at lp.org
>> 33. mailto:[90]wes.benedict at lp.org
>> 34. mailto:[91]wes.benedict at lp.org
>> 35. [92]http://facebook.com/libertarians
>> 36. [93]http://lp.org/membership
>> 37. mailto:[94]robert.kraus at lp.org
>> 38. mailto:[95]wes.benedict at lp.org
>> 39. mailto:[96]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
>> 40.
>>
> [97]https://maps.google.com/?q=n+Ann+and+Jess+Mears+together+are+n&e
> ntry=gmail&source=g
>> 41. mailto:[98]wes.benedict at lp.org
>> 42. [99]http://facebook.com/libertarians
>> 43. [100]http://lp.org/membership
>> 44. mailto:[101]robert.kraus at lp.org
>> 45. mailto:[102]wes.benedict at lp.org
>> 46.
>>
> [103]https://maps.google.com/?q=Harlos+pegged+as+solicitor+for+a+tot
> al+of+$2,33&entry=gmail&source=g
>> 47. mailto:[104]wes.benedict at lp.org
>> 48. [105]http://facebook.com/libertarians
>> 49. [106]http://lp.org/membership
>> 50. mailto:[107]robert.kraus at lp.org
>> 51. mailto:[108]wes.benedict at lp.org
>> 52. mailto:[109]Operations at LP.org
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 2. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 3. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 4. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 5. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 6. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 7. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 8. mailto:planning4liberty at gmail.com
> 9. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 10. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 11. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 12. http://lp.org/membership
> 13. mailto:robert.kraus at lp.org
> 14. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 15. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 16. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 17. http://lp.org/membership
> 18. mailto:robert.kraus at lp.org
> 19. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 20. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 21. https://maps.google.com/?q=n+Ann+and+Jess+Mears+together+are
> 22. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 23. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 24. http://lp.org/membership
> 25. mailto:robert.kraus at lp.org
> 26. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 27. https://maps.google.com/?q=Harlos+pegged+as+solicitor+for+a+
> 28. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 29. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 30. http://lp.org/membership
> 31. mailto:robert.kraus at lp.org
> 32. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 33. mailto:planning4liberty at gmail.com
> 34. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 35. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 36. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 37. http://lp.org/membership
> 38. mailto:robert.kraus at lp.org
> 39. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 40. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 41. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 42. http://lp.org/membership
> 43. mailto:robert.kraus at lp.org
> 44. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 45. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 46. https://maps.google.com/?q=n+Ann+and+Jess+Mears+together+are+n&e
> 47. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 48. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 49. http://lp.org/membership
> 50. mailto:robert.kraus at lp.org
> 51. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 52. https://maps.google.com/?q=Harlos+pegged+as+solicitor+for+a+tota
> 53. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 54. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 55. http://lp.org/membership
> 56. mailto:robert.kraus at lp.org
> 57. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 58. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 59. mailto:planning4liberty at gmail.com
> 60. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 61. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 62. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 63. http://lp.org/membership
> 64. mailto:robert.kraus at lp.org
> 65. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 66. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 67. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 68. http://lp.org/membership
> 69. mailto:robert.kraus at lp.org
> 70. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 71. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 72. https://maps.google.com/?q=n+Ann+and+Jess+Mears+together+are+n&e
> 73. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 74. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 75. http://lp.org/membership
> 76. mailto:robert.kraus at lp.org
> 77. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 78. https://maps.google.com/?q=Harlos+pegged+as+solicitor+for+a+tota
> 79. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 80. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 81. http://lp.org/membership
> 82. mailto:robert.kraus at lp.org
> 83. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 84. mailto:planning4liberty at gmail.com
> 85. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 86. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 87. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 88. http://lp.org/membership
> 89. mailto:robert.kraus at lp.org
> 90. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 91. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 92. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 93. http://lp.org/membership
> 94. mailto:robert.kraus at lp.org
> 95. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 96. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 97. https://maps.google.com/?q=n+Ann+and+Jess+Mears+together+are+n&entry=gmail&source=g
> 98. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 99. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 100. http://lp.org/membership
> 101. mailto:robert.kraus at lp.org
> 102. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 103. https://maps.google.com/?q=Harlos+pegged+as+solicitor+for+a+total+of+$2,33&entry=gmail&source=g
> 104. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 105. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 106. http://lp.org/membership
> 107. mailto:robert.kraus at lp.org
> 108. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 109. mailto:Operations at LP.org
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list