[Lnc-business] A gift for the next LNC
Caryn Ann Harlos
caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
Wed Mar 7 21:52:15 EST 2018
Zoom has all those bells and whistles.
And they actually work.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:47 PM Elizabeth Van Horn <elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org>
wrote:
> Yes, that was a noted limitation. That a particular person has to be
> there, or it fails. Not only is it an imposition on that person, but
> what if they're unable to be there? A definite flaw in the set-up to
> require a named person to host the platform.
>
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
> LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
> Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
> Chair-LP Social Media Process Review Committee
> Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
> http://www.lpcaucus.org/
>
> On 2018-03-07 21:38, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> > Some free versions have issues but Go To Meeting for the same price is
> > WAY better.
> >
> > And making one person have to host is frankly - ridiculous.
> >
> > All LNC and convention committees should be able to use with their
> > own
> > chairs or secretaries hosting.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:35 PM Caryn Ann Harlos
> > <[1]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
> >
> > If I said it was awful it would be an insult to awful.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:30 PM Elizabeth Van Horn
> > <[2]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
> >
> > Yes.
> > Tuesday night in the platform committee meeting, I make a point to
> > say
> > that even generic online meeting options that are free, would work
> > better than Adobe Connect. This was after general confusion,
> > people
> > crashing, various people unable to hear audio, some unable to
> > connect,
> > etc. Caryn Ann pointed out to me that the platform committee was
> > bound
> > to the same online meeting options as the LNC.
> > While I'm not privy to whatever contract the LNC/LP has with
> > Adobe,
> > looking at other options is needed. I'm glad to see Caryn Ann also
> > speaking up about this techno-limitation that online meetings have
> > for
> > LP committees, and this board. I'd be willing to work with anyone
> > on a
> > new proposal for other options.
> > ---
> > Elizabeth Van Horn
> > On 2018-03-07 21:19, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> > > Get rid of Adobe Connect.
> > >
> > > It’s awful.
> > >
> > > I would be willing to work on a new proposal using Zoom or Go
> > To
> > > Meeting.
> >
> > References
> >
> > 1. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> > 2. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
Zoom has all those bells and whistles.
And they actually work.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:47 PM Elizabeth Van Horn
<[1]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
Yes, that was a noted limitation. That a particular person has to
be
there, or it fails. Not only is it an imposition on that person,
but
what if they're unable to be there? A definite flaw in the set-up
to
require a named person to host the platform.
---
Elizabeth Van Horn
LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
Chair-LP Social Media Process Review Committee
Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
[2]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
On 2018-03-07 21:38, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> Some free versions have issues but Go To Meeting for the same
price is
> WAY better.
>
> And making one person have to host is frankly - ridiculous.
>
> All LNC and convention committees should be able to use with
their
> own
> chairs or secretaries hosting.
>
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:35 PM Caryn Ann Harlos
> <[1][3]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>
> If I said it was awful it would be an insult to awful.
>
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:30 PM Elizabeth Van Horn
> <[2][4]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
>
> Yes.
> Tuesday night in the platform committee meeting, I make a
point to
> say
> that even generic online meeting options that are free, would
work
> better than Adobe Connect. This was after general confusion,
> people
> crashing, various people unable to hear audio, some unable to
> connect,
> etc. Caryn Ann pointed out to me that the platform committee
was
> bound
> to the same online meeting options as the LNC.
> While I'm not privy to whatever contract the LNC/LP has with
> Adobe,
> looking at other options is needed. I'm glad to see Caryn Ann
also
> speaking up about this techno-limitation that online meetings
have
> for
> LP committees, and this board. I'd be willing to work with
anyone
> on a
> new proposal for other options.
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
> On 2018-03-07 21:19, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> > Get rid of Adobe Connect.
> >
> > It’s awful.
> >
> > I would be willing to work on a new proposal using Zoom
or Go
> To
> > Meeting.
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:[5]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 2. mailto:[6]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
References
1. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
2. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
3. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
4. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
5. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
6. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list