[Lnc-business] Judicial committee

[John Phillips]

While I agree with Caryn Ann, and do not like the whole process, at this 
point I think that are choices are limited.  I would just as soon not 
get accused of trying to "stack" the judicial committee if we start 
looking at doing appointments, and we obviously have to have one, though 
hopefully never use it.

Wes, Not really, no.
As we left it, do we need a motion under the interpretation that the 
Judicial Committee is elected by the same process that the At Large 
members are as Nick discussed before officially opening the meeting?  
Theoretically we could just let that ride.

Again, while I side with Caryn Ann in not liking it, I do not have have 
any better options to offer.

John Phillips
Libertarian National Committee Region 6
Cell 217-412-5973
On 7/5/2018 5:04 PM, Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business wrote:
>     Since we apparently closed the convention without a procedure for
>     populating the JC, is anyone in the mood for a motion to appoint the
>     top seven vote winners as the JC for this term?  I suppose we can be
>     anarchists and live without a JC this term or solicit applications from
>     people who were not nominated at convention.
>
>     I don't have the top seven names handy, we would have to verify they
>     have been members for four years.
>
>     --
>     Sam Goldstein
>     Libertarian National Committee
>     317-850-0726 Cell
>

-- 
John Phillips
Libertarian National Committee Region 6
Cell 217-412-5973