[Lnc-business] Judicial committee
Caryn Ann Harlos
caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
Thu Jul 5 18:56:51 EDT 2018
The past JC should stay in place.
I believe the At-Large and now perhaps the JC decisions are illegitimate.
Again, yes I know the delegates passed it. After being led to that
decision and having no real choice in the matter due to our own fault.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 4:53 PM, John Phillips via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> Question, is it possible to just approve the top 7 PROVISIONALLY while we
> examine the matter? Or perhaps ask the previous members to stay on until we
> sort it out?
>
> Having the judicial in place is fairly important, even if we never have to
> use them. So again while I do agree with the frustration at the process, I
> think that it is important to make at least a temporary move quickly, just
> in case something comes up that DOES need judicial review - like honestly
> whatever we decide on this may come to.
>
> John Phillips
> Libertarian National Committee Region 6
> Cell 217-412-5973
>
> On 7/5/2018 5:35 PM, Craig Bowden via Lnc-business wrote:
>
>> I must speak out against moving forward just yet. We are rushing, and I
>> don't believe it is in the best interests of Region 1 or the National Party
>> to rush through this process. We have already had one delegation request
>> the At Large breakdown, which was brought up by Caryn Ann, and the request
>> for that election to be audited.
>>
>> We also absolutely need to form an Elections Committee so that we do not
>> have this issue in the future. No one, not even one of our founding members
>> received a majority in the election. I understand we ran out of time at
>> convention, but we must be careful in what we decide to do as the governing
>> body.
>>
>> Respectfully,
>> Craig Bowden
>> Region 1 Alternate
>>
>> On 2018-07-05 16:22, Whitney Bilyeu via Lnc-business wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 5:04 PM Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business
>>> <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Since we apparently closed the convention without a procedure for
>>> populating the JC, is anyone in the mood for a motion to appoint
>>> the
>>> top seven vote winners as the JC for this term? I suppose we can
>>> be
>>> anarchists and live without a JC this term or solicit
>>> applications from
>>> people who were not nominated at convention.
>>> I don't have the top seven names handy, we would have to verify
>>> they
>>> have been members for four years.
>>> --
>>> Sam Goldstein
>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>> 317-850-0726 Cell
>>>
>>> References
>>>
>>> 1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
--
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
<http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
*We defend your rights*
*And oppose the use of force*
*Taxation is theft*
-------------- next part --------------
The past JC should stay in place.
I believe the At-Large and now perhaps the JC decisions are
illegitimate.
Again, yes I know the delegates passed it. After being led to that
decision and having no real choice in the matter due to our own
fault.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 4:53 PM, John Phillips via Lnc-business
<[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
Question, is it possible to just approve the top 7 PROVISIONALLY
while we examine the matter? Or perhaps ask the previous members to
stay on until we sort it out?
Having the judicial in place is fairly important, even if we never
have to use them. So again while I do agree with the frustration at
the process, I think that it is important to make at least a
temporary move quickly, just in case something comes up that DOES
need judicial review - like honestly whatever we decide on this may
come to.
John Phillips
Libertarian National Committee Region 6
Cell 217-412-5973
On 7/5/2018 5:35 PM, Craig Bowden via Lnc-business wrote:
I must speak out against moving forward just yet. We are rushing,
and I don't believe it is in the best interests of Region 1 or the
National Party to rush through this process. We have already had one
delegation request the At Large breakdown, which was brought up by
Caryn Ann, and the request for that election to be audited.
We also absolutely need to form an Elections Committee so that we do
not have this issue in the future. No one, not even one of our
founding members received a majority in the election. I understand
we ran out of time at convention, but we must be careful in what we
decide to do as the governing body.
Respectfully,
Craig Bowden
Region 1 Alternate
On 2018-07-05 16:22, Whitney Bilyeu via Lnc-business wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 5:04 PM Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business
<[1][2]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
Since we apparently closed the convention without a
procedure for
populating the JC, is anyone in the mood for a motion to
appoint
the
top seven vote winners as the JC for this term? I suppose
we can
be
anarchists and live without a JC this term or solicit
applications from
people who were not nominated at convention.
I don't have the top seven names handy, we would have to
verify
they
have been members for four years.
--
Sam Goldstein
Libertarian National Committee
317-850-0726 Cell
References
1. mailto:[3]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
--
--
In Liberty,
Caryn Ann Harlos
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington)
- [4]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
Communications Director, [5]Libertarian Party of Colorado
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
We defend your rights
And oppose the use of force
Taxation is theft
References
1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
2. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
3. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
4. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
5. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list