[Lnc-business] Judicial committee

Caryn Ann Harlos caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
Thu Jul 5 21:05:43 EDT 2018


It was presented to the delegates as:

a.  you say the top five
b.  you let the LNC do so and they shouldn't be trusted

It was the horns of a false dilemma and they were spoon-fed the path to
go.  To me that is interfering in our own internal elections and
inappropriate.  If this was the first time, well okay. For me it is the
second time and I am hearing that it has been multiple times.

It is time for this to not be swept under the rug with a patch.

I have not made a choice when I am told I have to pick between two bad
choices when there were other options if given some time to hash out.
Hell we could have done a run off standing vote between some of them.
These were so close that they do not represent at all what our rules
intended.

It's not right.  And I am not going to pretend like it is.

On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

> I'm pretty sure Alicia keeps all the paper ballots along with the state
> tally sheets from each convention.  Give her a day or two
> to rest up!
>
> ---
> Sam Goldstein
> Libertarian National Committee
> 317-850-0726 Cell
>
>
> On 2018-07-05 20:44, Craig Bowden via Lnc-business wrote:
>
>> I have one delegation in Region 1 right now that is not happy about
>> the At Large situation, and is requesting an audit of the vote.
>> Specifically the state by state break down, as is afforded on all
>> other election results, but no delegation was able to review the
>> results to ensure accuracy. There is further concern that there was no
>> preservation of the original ballots from the delegations.
>>
>> I can tell you this much: had I known what was going on, I would have
>> raised these concerns on the floor. Unfortunately, I had to credential
>> out because I had to get on a flight back to Utah for July 4th as my
>> campaign had multiple outreach events. Many delegates also were
>> candidates that had to leave for similar reasons.
>>
>> We cannot rush through this as if it is an afterthought. Especially if
>> there ended up being a need for the JC to rule on an issue.
>>
>> Craig Bowden
>> Region 1 Alternate
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2018-07-05 18:30, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>>
>>> As this is an LNC created committee, I think that committee creation by
>>>    larger unrelated bodies is a recipe for disaster.  As a group we can
>>>    pick applicants who fill in needed holes and knowledge.  I am not
>>>    thinking 50 person.  I am thinking 9, 11, or 13.  It is a big issue.
>>>    I think some LNC members should be ex officio advisory members only.
>>>
>>>    On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 6:27 PM, Elizabeth Van Horn
>>>    <[1]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>      Caryn Ann, I was thinking state chairs or people they appoint.
>>>      Which could be some of the people you're thinking might be good.
>>>      A 50 person committee would be too large (someone from each state
>>>      affiliate), but Regions could send one or two people.  Eight regions
>>>      and two from each, so maybe 16 people.  (Or, could be smaller)
>>>      They could work on "improving the election scheduling, balloting,
>>>      and tabulation process", and report sometime in 2019 to see what
>>>      improvements could be made.
>>>      ---
>>>      Elizabeth Van Horn
>>>      LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
>>>      Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
>>>      LP Social Media Process Review Committee
>>>      Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
>>>      [2]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
>>>      On 2018-07-05 20:12, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>
>>>      It needs a much larger and more diverse committee that doesn't have
>>>      the
>>>         LNC's thumb on it like every other committee.  Many many many
>>>      qualified
>>>         people offered, including former LNC people who have been to this
>>>         rodeo.
>>>         On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 6:06 PM, joe.bishop-henchman--- via
>>>      Lnc-business
>>>         <[1][3]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>           Good questions. My answers would be that the only way this
>>>      works is
>>>           if everyone feels like they have a seat at the table. Timing
>>>      wise,
>>>           this gives them time to collect ideas and feedback while giving
>>>      us
>>>           time to address it if they can't come up with a consensus
>>>           recommendation.
>>>           It's also more than just technology - it's also whether we do
>>>           plurality or IRV or approval, it's whether we do combined
>>>      ballots or
>>>           all separate, it's whether we need three days or four or five.
>>>           There's off-the-shelf electronic voting things we can rent -
>>>      I've
>>>           done elections with them before - but I think our Party members
>>>           would without buy-in reject them as centralized and potentially
>>>      not
>>>           secure. The solution may just be some new bylaws changes and
>>>      more
>>>           tellers and computers, and no new technology. I'm not sure.
>>>           JBH
>>>         On 2018-07-05 19:56, john.phillips--- via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>           Why start a new committee? Shouldn't this fall under the
>>>      purview of
>>>           IT?
>>>              John Phillips
>>>              Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
>>>              Cell [1]217-412-5973
>>>              ------ Original message------
>>>              From: [2]joe.bishop-henchman--- via Lnc-business
>>>              Date: Thu, Jul 5, 2018 6:32 PM
>>>
>>>            To: [3][2][4]lnc-business at hq.lp.org;
>>>            Cc: [4][3][5]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org;
>>>            Subject:Re: [Lnc-business] Judicial committee
>>>         I've been thinking about this since the night of the At-Large/JC
>>>         election and I do share Ms. Harlos's frustration. I had perhaps
>>>    100
>>>         delegates who were going to support me already leave by the time
>>>    we
>>>         got
>>>         to the At-Large election. Complaining about how long balloting
>>> and
>>>         tabulation took is already the #1 feedback topic I'm getting from
>>>         Party
>>>         members.
>>>         That said, I agree with Ms. Van Horn that the Convention did
>>>    perhaps
>>>         the
>>>         least worst option under the circumstances. I worry that anything
>>>    we
>>>         do
>>>         that departs from that, be it putting our own people on or
>>> keeping
>>>         the
>>>         dead hand of the last JC or sending a mail ballot to all Party
>>>         members
>>>         or some rump thereof, is even more disconnected from the rules we
>>>         should
>>>         be following and destined to be viewed as illegitimate and
>>>    post-hoc.
>>>         I would like to fix it for next time, as I know many of you do.
>>>         Taking
>>>         Mr. Goldstein's suggestion, I took a stab at tackling three birds
>>>         with
>>>         one stone:
>>>         WHEREAS, the Libertarian National Convention on July 3, 2018
>>> voted
>>>         that
>>>         the top vote-getters in the At-Large race fill all available
>>>         At-Large
>>>         seats on the LNC; and
>>>         WHEREAS, Rule 9 directs that the election of Judicial Committee
>>>         members
>>>         be conducted as the same manner as specified for at-large members
>>>    of
>>>         the
>>>         National Committee; and
>>>         WHEREAS, LNC action pursuant to Bylaws Article 7, Section 7 would
>>>         clear
>>>         all potential doubts as to who the new LNC members are;
>>>         THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Joshua Smith, Bill Redpath, and
>>>         Alicia
>>>         Mattson are added to the LNC as At-Large members for a two-year
>>>         term;
>>>         and
>>>         BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the LNC acknowledges the election of
>>>    D.
>>>         Frank Robinson, Chuck Moulton, Darryl Perry, Ruth Bennett, Geoff
>>>         Neale,
>>>         Jim Turney, and Tricia Sprankle to the Judicial Committee for a
>>>         four-year term; and
>>>         BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a special committee be established to
>>>         present a consensus recommendation to the LNC by September 1,
>>> 2019
>>>         for
>>>         improving the election scheduling, balloting, and tabulation
>>>    process
>>>         of
>>>         LNC elections, with said committee to consist of:
>>>         (1) the Party Vice-Chair, who will act as chairperson
>>>         (2) the Party Secretary
>>>         (3) a designee of the Bylaws & Rules Committee
>>>         (4) four Party members appointed by the Party Chair, from among
>>>    the
>>>         various caucuses in the Party.
>>>         JBH
>>>         On [5]2018-07-05 18:04, Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>         Since we apparently closed the convention without a procedure for
>>>            populating the JC, is anyone in the mood for a motion to
>>>    appoint
>>>         the
>>>            top seven vote winners as the JC for this term?  I suppose we
>>>    can
>>>         be
>>>            anarchists and live without a JC this term or solicit
>>>         applications
>>>         from
>>>            people who were not nominated at convention.
>>>            I don't have the top seven names handy, we would have to
>>> verify
>>>         they
>>>            have been members for four years.
>>>            --
>>>            Sam Goldstein
>>>            Libertarian National Committee
>>>            [6]317-850-0726 Cell
>>>         References
>>>            1. tel:217-412-5973
>>>
>>>              2. [4][6]http://joe.bi/
>>>              3. mailto:[5][7]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>              4. mailto:[6][8]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>              5. tel:2018-07-05 18
>>>              6. tel:317-850-0726
>>>         --
>>>         --
>>>         In Liberty,
>>>         Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>         Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>>>         Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
>>>      Washington)
>>>         - [7]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
>>>         Communications Director, [8]Libertarian Party of Colorado
>>>         Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>>>         A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>         We defend your rights
>>>         And oppose the use of force
>>>         Taxation is theft
>>>      References
>>>         1. mailto:[9]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>         2. mailto:[10]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>         3. mailto:[11]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>         4. [12]http://joe.bi/
>>>         5. mailto:[13]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>         6. mailto:[14]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>         7. mailto:[15]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>         8. [16]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>
>>>    --
>>>    --
>>>    In Liberty,
>>>    Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>    Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>>>    Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington)
>>>    - [17]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
>>>    Communications Director, [18]Libertarian Party of Colorado
>>>    Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>>>    A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>    We defend your rights
>>>    And oppose the use of force
>>>    Taxation is theft
>>>
>>> References
>>>
>>>    1. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
>>>    2. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
>>>    3. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>    4. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>    5. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>    6. http://joe.bi/
>>>    7. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>    8. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>    9. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>   10. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>   11. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>   12. http://joe.bi/
>>>   13. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>   14. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>   15. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>   16. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>   17. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>   18. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>
>>


-- 
-- 
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
<http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee

A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
*We defend your rights*
*And oppose the use of force*
*Taxation is theft*
-------------- next part --------------
   It was presented to the delegates as:
   a.  you say the top five
   b.  you let the LNC do so and they shouldn't be trusted
   It was the horns of a false dilemma and they were spoon-fed the path to
   go.  To me that is interfering in our own internal elections and
   inappropriate.  If this was the first time, well okay. For me it is the
   second time and I am hearing that it has been multiple times.
   It is time for this to not be swept under the rug with a patch.
   I have not made a choice when I am told I have to pick between two bad
   choices when there were other options if given some time to hash out.
     Hell we could have done a run off standing vote between some of
   them.  These were so close that they do not represent at all what our
   rules intended.
   It's not right.  And I am not going to pretend like it is.

   On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business
   <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

     I'm pretty sure Alicia keeps all the paper ballots along with the
     state tally sheets from each convention.  Give her a day or two
     to rest up!
     ---
     Sam Goldstein
     Libertarian National Committee
     317-850-0726 Cell

   On 2018-07-05 20:44, Craig Bowden via Lnc-business wrote:

     I have one delegation in Region 1 right now that is not happy about
     the At Large situation, and is requesting an audit of the vote.
     Specifically the state by state break down, as is afforded on all
     other election results, but no delegation was able to review the
     results to ensure accuracy. There is further concern that there was
     no
     preservation of the original ballots from the delegations.
     I can tell you this much: had I known what was going on, I would
     have
     raised these concerns on the floor. Unfortunately, I had to
     credential
     out because I had to get on a flight back to Utah for July 4th as my
     campaign had multiple outreach events. Many delegates also were
     candidates that had to leave for similar reasons.
     We cannot rush through this as if it is an afterthought. Especially
     if
     there ended up being a need for the JC to rule on an issue.
     Craig Bowden
     Region 1 Alternate
     On 2018-07-05 18:30, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:

     As this is an LNC created committee, I think that committee creation
     by
        larger unrelated bodies is a recipe for disaster.  As a group we
     can
        pick applicants who fill in needed holes and knowledge.  I am not
        thinking 50 person.  I am thinking 9, 11, or 13.  It is a big
     issue.
        I think some LNC members should be ex officio advisory members
     only.
        On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 6:27 PM, Elizabeth Van Horn
        <[1][2]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
          Caryn Ann, I was thinking state chairs or people they appoint.
          Which could be some of the people you're thinking might be
     good.
          A 50 person committee would be too large (someone from each
     state
          affiliate), but Regions could send one or two people.  Eight
     regions
          and two from each, so maybe 16 people.  (Or, could be smaller)
          They could work on "improving the election scheduling,
     balloting,
          and tabulation process", and report sometime in 2019 to see
     what
          improvements could be made.
          ---
          Elizabeth Van Horn
          LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
          Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
          LP Social Media Process Review Committee
          Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
          [2][3]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
          On 2018-07-05 20:12, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
          It needs a much larger and more diverse committee that doesn't
     have
          the
             LNC's thumb on it like every other committee.  Many many
     many
          qualified
             people offered, including former LNC people who have been to
     this
             rodeo.
             On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 6:06 PM, joe.bishop-henchman--- via
          Lnc-business
             <[1][3][4]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
               Good questions. My answers would be that the only way this
          works is
               if everyone feels like they have a seat at the table.
     Timing
          wise,
               this gives them time to collect ideas and feedback while
     giving
          us
               time to address it if they can't come up with a consensus
               recommendation.
               It's also more than just technology - it's also whether we
     do
               plurality or IRV or approval, it's whether we do combined
          ballots or
               all separate, it's whether we need three days or four or
     five.
               There's off-the-shelf electronic voting things we can rent
     -
          I've
               done elections with them before - but I think our Party
     members
               would without buy-in reject them as centralized and
     potentially
          not
               secure. The solution may just be some new bylaws changes
     and
          more
               tellers and computers, and no new technology. I'm not
     sure.
               JBH
             On 2018-07-05 19:56, john.phillips--- via Lnc-business
     wrote:
               Why start a new committee? Shouldn't this fall under the
          purview of
               IT?
                  John Phillips
                  Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
                  Cell [1]217-412-5973
                  ------ Original message------
                  From: [2]joe.bishop-henchman--- via Lnc-business
                  Date: Thu, Jul 5, 2018 6:32 PM
                To: [3][2][4][5]lnc-business at hq.lp.org;
                Cc: [4][3][5][6]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org;
                Subject:Re: [Lnc-business] Judicial committee
             I've been thinking about this since the night of the
     At-Large/JC
             election and I do share Ms. Harlos's frustration. I had
     perhaps
        100
             delegates who were going to support me already leave by the
     time
        we
             got
             to the At-Large election. Complaining about how long
     balloting and
             tabulation took is already the #1 feedback topic I'm getting
     from
             Party
             members.
             That said, I agree with Ms. Van Horn that the Convention did
        perhaps
             the
             least worst option under the circumstances. I worry that
     anything
        we
             do
             that departs from that, be it putting our own people on or
     keeping
             the
             dead hand of the last JC or sending a mail ballot to all
     Party
             members
             or some rump thereof, is even more disconnected from the
     rules we
             should
             be following and destined to be viewed as illegitimate and
        post-hoc.
             I would like to fix it for next time, as I know many of you
     do.
             Taking
             Mr. Goldstein's suggestion, I took a stab at tackling three
     birds
             with
             one stone:
             WHEREAS, the Libertarian National Convention on July 3, 2018
     voted
             that
             the top vote-getters in the At-Large race fill all available
             At-Large
             seats on the LNC; and
             WHEREAS, Rule 9 directs that the election of Judicial
     Committee
             members
             be conducted as the same manner as specified for at-large
     members
        of
             the
             National Committee; and
             WHEREAS, LNC action pursuant to Bylaws Article 7, Section 7
     would
             clear
             all potential doubts as to who the new LNC members are;
             THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Joshua Smith, Bill Redpath,
     and
             Alicia
             Mattson are added to the LNC as At-Large members for a
     two-year
             term;
             and
             BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the LNC acknowledges the
     election of
        D.
             Frank Robinson, Chuck Moulton, Darryl Perry, Ruth Bennett,
     Geoff
             Neale,
             Jim Turney, and Tricia Sprankle to the Judicial Committee
     for a
             four-year term; and
             BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a special committee be
     established to
             present a consensus recommendation to the LNC by September
     1, 2019
             for
             improving the election scheduling, balloting, and tabulation
        process
             of
             LNC elections, with said committee to consist of:
             (1) the Party Vice-Chair, who will act as chairperson
             (2) the Party Secretary
             (3) a designee of the Bylaws & Rules Committee
             (4) four Party members appointed by the Party Chair, from
     among
        the
             various caucuses in the Party.
             JBH
             On [5]2018-07-05 18:04, Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business
     wrote:
             Since we apparently closed the convention without a
     procedure for
                populating the JC, is anyone in the mood for a motion to
        appoint
             the
                top seven vote winners as the JC for this term?  I
     suppose we
        can
             be
                anarchists and live without a JC this term or solicit
             applications
             from
                people who were not nominated at convention.
                I don't have the top seven names handy, we would have to
     verify
             they
                have been members for four years.
                --
                Sam Goldstein
                Libertarian National Committee
                [6]317-850-0726 Cell
             References
                1. tel:217-412-5973
                  2. [4][6][7]http://joe.bi/
                  3. mailto:[5][7][8]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
                  4. mailto:[6][8][9]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
                  5. tel:2018-07-05 18
                  6. tel:317-850-0726
             --
             --
             In Liberty,
             Caryn Ann Harlos
             Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee
     (Alaska,
             Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
          Washington)
             - [7]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
             Communications Director, [8]Libertarian Party of Colorado
             Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
             A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
             We defend your rights
             And oppose the use of force
             Taxation is theft
          References
             1. mailto:[9][10]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
             2. mailto:[10][11]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
             3. mailto:[11][12]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
             4. [12][13]http://joe.bi/
             5. mailto:[13][14]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
             6. mailto:[14][15]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
             7. mailto:[15]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
             8. [16][16]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
        --
        --
        In Liberty,
        Caryn Ann Harlos
        Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
        Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
     Washington)
        - [17]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
        Communications Director, [18]Libertarian Party of Colorado
        Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
        A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
        We defend your rights
        And oppose the use of force
        Taxation is theft
     References
        1. mailto:[17]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
        2. [18]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
        3. mailto:[19]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
        4. mailto:[20]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
        5. mailto:[21]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
        6. [22]http://joe.bi/
        7. mailto:[23]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
        8. mailto:[24]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
        9. mailto:[25]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       10. mailto:[26]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       11. mailto:[27]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
       12. [28]http://joe.bi/
       13. mailto:[29]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       14. mailto:[30]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
       15. mailto:[31]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
       16. [32]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
       17. mailto:[33]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
       18. [34]http://www.lpcolorado.org/

   --
   --
   In Liberty,
   Caryn Ann Harlos
   Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
   Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington)
   - [35]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
   Communications Director, [36]Libertarian Party of Colorado
   Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
   A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
   We defend your rights
   And oppose the use of force
   Taxation is theft

References

   1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   2. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
   3. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
   4. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   5. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   6. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
   7. http://joe.bi/
   8. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   9. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
  10. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  11. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  12. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
  13. http://joe.bi/
  14. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  15. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
  16. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
  17. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  18. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
  19. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  20. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  21. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
  22. http://joe.bi/
  23. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  24. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
  25. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  26. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  27. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
  28. http://joe.bi/
  29. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  30. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
  31. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
  32. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
  33. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
  34. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
  35. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
  36. http://www.lpcolorado.org/


More information about the Lnc-business mailing list