[Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2018-11: ACKNOWLEDGE ELECTION OF JC
Elizabeth Van Horn
elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
Wed Jul 11 19:38:40 EDT 2018
No one is "diminishing" your stance. I also stated my opinion. Nor, am
I not going to be silent when I see unwarranted accusations being tossed
around on this list.
Yes, that's my opinion. Also, the accusations that Caryn Ann has made
about people being "silenced' is unwarranted. (Nor, am I the only to
think this.)
You don't have to agree, but neither do I have to be silent on this.
---
Elizabeth Van Horn
On 2018-07-11 19:25, erin.adams at lp.org wrote:
> Elizabeth,
> It is an overall "feeling", Im clearly not the only person "feeling"
> this, you dont have to agree, you dont have to acknowledge my stance
> nor my feeling, you dont get to diminish my stance either. It is my
> OPINION that there is a push to silence, like it or not, that IS my
> belief. I dont need to justify that, it simply is.
>
>
>
> On 2018-07-11 13:42, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
>> Erin, what others? I haven't seen anyone on this list try to silence
>> others. Most people have discussed, I added the type of feedback I'm
>> getting in region 3, and what options they're wanting. Others have
>> done the same. If anything there's been pressure put on those who
>> want to move-on, by saying that people will bring up the topic
>> constantly, and if a "yes" vote happens, that person immediately being
>> gone after to change their vote.
>>
>> I have voted yet, as I'm still getting opinions from my region, but I
>> can say that no one has shown an interest in rehashing the At-Large
>> vote. For the JC, more seem inclined to just *not* have a JC, and
>> have the body elect a new JC in 2020. (Some others wish to have us
>> accept the top-seven vote-getters of the JC)
>>
>> If you have a complaint about a specific person, perhaps you could
>> take it to them off list, but to accuse wholesale those who have
>> discussed this issue, of "others" trying to silence people makes no
>> sense.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>
>>
>> On 2018-07-11 10:50, erin.adams--- via Lnc-business wrote:
>>> Mr. Bishop-Henchman,
>>> YOU may not be but others CERTAINLY are. The tone of many seems to be
>>> Shut up and get over it. Let me be clear that I have NO intention of
>>> doing that.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2018-07-11 09:40, Joe Bishop-Henchman wrote:
>>>> Ms. Adams,
>>>>
>>>> By my count we have sent 400 emails to each other in a week. Ms.
>>>> Harlos has sent 18 emails in the last twelve hours, more than I've
>>>> sent in total in a week. People may gripe about it but no one is
>>>> actually being silenced.
>>>>
>>>> I'm doing my best to respond to points being made, answering
>>>> questions
>>>> and respectfully if energetically countering arguments. Your
>>>> response
>>>> to me was that the proposal I've sponsored is "bullshit,"
>>>> "unacceptable," "gross," "vile," and "sickening." You then
>>>> complained
>>>> about the tone of the debate.
>>>>
>>>> I would like to have a good working relationship with all of you. On
>>>> Bylaws, if I was on the winning side of votes I made sure the
>>>> minority
>>>> got a fair shake at presenting their views. If I was on the losing
>>>> side, I accepted it and did my best to make sure that what we had
>>>> passed worked. And I never resorted to name-calling or martyrdom.
>>>> The
>>>> enemy isn't on this Committee. The enemy are the people out there
>>>> passing warrantless wiretapping, locking refugee kids up in cages,
>>>> bombing the world, and spending us into oblivion. I promise I will
>>>> keep sight of that and will greatly respect all of you who do also,
>>>> even if we occasionally disagree on how we will do it.
>>>>
>>>> JBH
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2018-07-11 10:24, erin.adams--- via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>> With all due respect Sam, that simply isnt true. It is not true
>>>>> that "
>>>>> There is nothing we can do about it
>>>>> at this point except live with it the best we can for two years."
>>>>> and
>>>>> honestly, Im sickened by the tactics Im seeing here from some in an
>>>>> attempt to FURTHER silence others. Its vile at best. Buckle up
>>>>> folks,
>>>>> if this is the tone that sets the way for THIS lnc,Many of you will
>>>>> hate me the end of this term. Alternate or not I WILL NOT be
>>>>> dismissed
>>>>> and silenced.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2018-07-09 20:09, Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>> Caryn Ann,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We all acknowledge that the LNC At Large and JC elections went
>>>>>> awry.
>>>>>> There is nothing we can do about it
>>>>>> at this point except live with it the best we can for two years.
>>>>>> We
>>>>>> will have a fix in place before the
>>>>>> convention convenes at Austin that can be passed by the delegates
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> made effective immediately.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At the very least, take the discussion off the email ballot thread
>>>>>> which is supposed to just be for recording
>>>>>> votes on the motion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Sam Goldstein
>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>> 317-850-0726 Cell
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2018-07-09 20:55, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>> Oh my goodness. I am sorry but this is beyond belief.
>>>>>>> I think our elections were handled wrongfully and I am
>>>>>>> supposed to NOT
>>>>>>> yell it from the rooftops? What Party am I in again?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:52 PM, John Phillips via Lnc-business
>>>>>>> <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Agreed, to a point. At some time, preaching to the choir
>>>>>>> becomes
>>>>>>> counter productive. As noted earlier, we are all aware that
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> sucked, and is a bad situation with no easy fix that will
>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>> everyone happy immediately. We all want to fix it, and fix
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> yesterday. I even agree with all of Caryn Ann's points, and
>>>>>>> yours.
>>>>>>> Bring it up once a week. Absolutely. Don't bring it up 5
>>>>>>> times a
>>>>>>> day. Stopping multiple times to read the same arguments
>>>>>>> takes away
>>>>>>> time from working on fixing it, and promoting the party in
>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>> ways. I love the passion, I really do, but beating us up
>>>>>>> continually
>>>>>>> on a point we 90% or more agree on IS counterproductive.
>>>>>>> Let's move
>>>>>>> on and FIX IT.
>>>>>>> Don't shut up, but let's be productive, let's not let this
>>>>>>> crap
>>>>>>> happen again.
>>>>>>> John Phillips
>>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
>>>>>>> Cell 217-412-5973
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 7/9/2018 7:39 PM, Craig Bowden via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looking out for the membership and delegates is nothing to
>>>>>>> be quiet
>>>>>>> about. I personally hope it is brought up at least once a
>>>>>>> week until
>>>>>>> solutions are in place to prevent it from ever happening
>>>>>>> again.
>>>>>>> Respectfully,
>>>>>>> Craig Bowden
>>>>>>> Region 1 Alternate
>>>>>>> On 2018-07-09 18:33, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I respectfully decline.
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:29 PM, Sam Goldstein
>>>>>>> <[1][2]sam.goldstein at lp.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Caryn Ann,
>>>>>>> Just shut up about this already!
>>>>>>> Respectfully,
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> Sam Goldstein
>>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>> 317-850-0726 Cell
>>>>>>> On 2018-07-09 18:34, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> PS: Before this vote ends, I am going to put something
>>>>>>> together
>>>>>>> to try
>>>>>>> to convince you that this is actually one of the worst
>>>>>>> ways to
>>>>>>> solve.
>>>>>>> My first issue - that of steering the delegates down
>>>>>>> that road
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> at-large is unsolvable- at least unsolvable in any way
>>>>>>> that we
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>> ever do. If it were up to me, I would punt it all
>>>>>>> back to the
>>>>>>> delegates.
>>>>>>> The second issue - of how to handle this situation
>>>>>>> with the JC
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>> well
>>>>>>> we are trying to solve it now and I think we are
>>>>>>> solving it
>>>>>>> wrong
>>>>>>> both
>>>>>>> ethically and procedurally.
>>>>>>> And a remaining issue - is one where me and RONR come
>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>> conflict.
>>>>>>> Rules are tools. Just because a rule allows something
>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>> mean
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> is right, and this is probably why the first issue is
>>>>>>> sticking
>>>>>>> in my
>>>>>>> craw so badly. It is fundamentally NOT RIGHT to
>>>>>>> change the
>>>>>>> rules of
>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>> election mid-way. There is a huge difference between
>>>>>>> majority
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> plurality and our candidates deserve to know as it
>>>>>>> effects the
>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>> campaign. We treated them and their efforts as pawns,
>>>>>>> and it
>>>>>>> isn't
>>>>>>> right.
>>>>>>> I know some of you are thinking, just shut up about
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> already.
>>>>>>> Well, I am a hard-nose on some things, and this is one
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>> Just
>>>>>>> like it was with the eternal secrecy clause last term.
>>>>>>> The only way we are going to learn as an organization
>>>>>>> is if
>>>>>>> this is
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> bit painful. And in so doing we will model
>>>>>>> over-the-top
>>>>>>> integrity
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> our members rather than political expediency.
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>> <[1][2][3]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> ==I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately do
>>>>>>> get the
>>>>>>> state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that
>>>>>>> hundreds of
>>>>>>> delegates
>>>>>>> didn't even vote in the two races because we put them
>>>>>>> off so
>>>>>>> long.
>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>> the 2016 convention, whole states didn't cast votes in
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> At-Large
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> JC races. Them's the rules - elections are won by
>>>>>>> those who
>>>>>>> stay and
>>>>>>> vote - but oh my did we make it hard. The combination
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> voting
>>>>>>> methodology, tabulation method, and scheduling left us
>>>>>>> in a
>>>>>>> bad
>>>>>>> place.===
>>>>>>> You mean we ran in front of a racing car and now are
>>>>>>> surprised
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>> got
>>>>>>> ran over?
>>>>>>> But it is more than that. The delegates were led to
>>>>>>> make a
>>>>>>> decision
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> a certain direction. There WERE other options.
>>>>>>> Whether or
>>>>>>> not one
>>>>>>> agrees with the voting methodology, it is the
>>>>>>> methodology and
>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>> intent was to use approval voting to show approval and
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>> turned it
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>> its head. Why weren't the delegates given other
>>>>>>> options?
>>>>>>> ==All that said, I don't want to just be angry and
>>>>>>> complain.
>>>>>>> As far
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>> actions that can be taken, this resolution is the most
>>>>>>> reasonable.
>>>>>>> Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of all
>>>>>>> Party
>>>>>>> members or
>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>> filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs in motion
>>>>>>> - are
>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>> violative of the Bylaws and Rules.==
>>>>>>> Are they all? I don't think so. And I do think my
>>>>>>> very real
>>>>>>> complaint
>>>>>>> of how the delegates were steered in a certain
>>>>>>> direction is
>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>> ignored at best (or maligned at worst).
>>>>>>> ==The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread of
>>>>>>> legality:
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> delegates expressed their wish to take the top
>>>>>>> at-large
>>>>>>> candidates
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC. There's
>>>>>>> also no
>>>>>>> doubt in
>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>> mind that had they been asked they would have done the
>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>> JC.
>>>>>>> A room of several hundred Libertarians were not
>>>>>>> coerced into
>>>>>>> doing
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> - they went with what Nick suggested because that's
>>>>>>> what they
>>>>>>> wanted
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> do. He just told them how.===
>>>>>>> And that is where the dispute is. Most of the people
>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>> (I use us as Nick was acting as the spokesperson of
>>>>>>> the LNC
>>>>>>> and this
>>>>>>> isn't about Nick ultimately) not to tell them what
>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>> wanted.
>>>>>>> They
>>>>>>> were presented with two choices in which they were led
>>>>>>> down a
>>>>>>> particular path. You are an attorney Joe, you know
>>>>>>> exactly
>>>>>>> what I
>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>> getting at here.
>>>>>>> Do you really think that if they were offered a
>>>>>>> majority
>>>>>>> rising vote
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>> the spot to choose between options they would not have
>>>>>>> taken
>>>>>>> that?
>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>> never ocurred to most of them that there WERE any
>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>> options. It
>>>>>>> didn't immediately occur to me and I am well-versed in
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>> stinks. If a government acted this way we would be
>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>> lathered up.
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Joe Bishop-Henchman
>>>>>>> <[2][3][4]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately do
>>>>>>> get the
>>>>>>> state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that
>>>>>>> hundreds of
>>>>>>> delegates didn't even vote in the two races because
>>>>>>> we put
>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>> so long. In the 2016 convention, whole states didn't
>>>>>>> cast
>>>>>>> votes in
>>>>>>> the At-Large and JC races. Them's the rules -
>>>>>>> elections are
>>>>>>> won by
>>>>>>> those who stay and vote - but oh my did we make it
>>>>>>> hard. The
>>>>>>> combination of voting methodology, tabulation
>>>>>>> method, and
>>>>>>> scheduling
>>>>>>> left us in a bad place.
>>>>>>> All that said, I don't want to just be angry and
>>>>>>> complain.
>>>>>>> As far
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>> actions that can be taken, this resolution is the
>>>>>>> most
>>>>>>> reasonable.
>>>>>>> Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of all
>>>>>>> Party
>>>>>>> members
>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>> us filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs in
>>>>>>> motion -
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>> more violative of the Bylaws and Rules.
>>>>>>> I do not dispute that one can reasonably argue that
>>>>>>> every JC
>>>>>>> candidate was disapproved and that it should sit
>>>>>>> empty until
>>>>>>> 2022.
>>>>>>> The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread of
>>>>>>> legality:
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> delegates expressed their wish to take the top
>>>>>>> at-large
>>>>>>> candidates
>>>>>>> and the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC.
>>>>>>> There's also
>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>> doubt in my mind that had they been asked they would
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> done the
>>>>>>> same for the JC. A room of several hundred
>>>>>>> Libertarians were
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> coerced into doing that - they went with what Nick
>>>>>>> suggested
>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>> that's what they wanted to do. He just told them
>>>>>>> how. They
>>>>>>> didn't
>>>>>>> want the LNC fighting over who would fill the seats
>>>>>>> if they
>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>> left vacant.
>>>>>>> I doubt I'm going to convince you but I did want to
>>>>>>> write
>>>>>>> this to
>>>>>>> emphasize that at least I am not sanguine or
>>>>>>> sweeping
>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>> blithely under the rug. I expect rethinking how we
>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>> elections
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>> be a big priority for many of us.
>>>>>>> JBH
>>>>>>> On 2018-07-09 16:46, Caryn Ann Harlos via
>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Suspension of the rules has to be specific and there
>>>>>>> is no
>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>> around
>>>>>>> the fact that we used the number 5 over and over.
>>>>>>> This is taking things to an even deeper level of
>>>>>>> improper. I
>>>>>>> object to
>>>>>>> the whole at-Large process- I don’t think the
>>>>>>> delegates
>>>>>>> made an
>>>>>>> independent choice and now to just infer this
>>>>>>> upon that
>>>>>>> is two
>>>>>>> bridges
>>>>>>> too far.
>>>>>>> This is a big screwup and I won’t be part of
>>>>>>> sweeping it
>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>> the rug.
>>>>>>> It alarms me to no end how blithely the whole
>>>>>>> situation
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>> taken.
>>>>>>> There are people looking at us and seeing nothing
>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> government we wish to reform.
>>>>>>> There was a controversial election and at least
>>>>>>> one state
>>>>>>> chair
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> candidate has been asking for the state by state
>>>>>>> rallies
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>> frame given him.
>>>>>>> The whole thing was an affront to people
>>>>>>> expecting an
>>>>>>> entirely
>>>>>>> different thing when they ran. I will not be
>>>>>>> sanguine
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:20 PM Whitney Bilyeu
>>>>>>> <[1][3][4][5]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> This point did come up immediately after
>>>>>>> adjournment,
>>>>>>> while
>>>>>>> Nick
>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>> still at the mic. I don't recall who brought it
>>>>>>> up, but
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> statement
>>>>>>> was made that it would follow the same
>>>>>>> procedure as
>>>>>>> At-Large
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> point, since we were no longer in session.
>>>>>>> No one raised the question prior to that.
>>>>>>> Whitney Bilyeu
>>>>>>> Region 7 Representative
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Caryn Ann
>>>>>>> Harlos via
>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>> <[2][4][5][6]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> Joshua they were not given a choice on
>>>>>>> this. The
>>>>>>> JC
>>>>>>> never
>>>>>>> came
>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:47 AM
>>>>>>> <[1][3][5][6][7]joshua.smith at lp.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> I vote yes. Given that the delegates were
>>>>>>> given the
>>>>>>> choice
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> convention
>>>>>>> just a few short days ago, I believe we
>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>> respect
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> decision.
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Joshua D. Smith
>>>>>>> On 2018-07-07 22:23, Caryn Ann Harlos via
>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> > We have an electronic mail ballot. Votes
>>>>>>> are due
>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>> LNC-Business
>>>>>>> > list by July 14, 2018 at 11:59:59pm
>>>>>>> Pacific
>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>> Co-Sponsors:
>>>>>>> > Bishop-Henchman, Goldstein, Hagan,
>>>>>>> Merced, Van
>>>>>>> Horn
>>>>>>> Motion:
>>>>>>> Move
>>>>>>> > that
>>>>>>> > the Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>> acknowledge
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> election of
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> > following to the Judicial Committee for
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> four-year
>>>>>>> term:
>>>>>>> D.
>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>> > Robinson, Chuck Moulton, Darryl Perry,
>>>>>>> Ruth
>>>>>>> Bennett,
>>>>>>> Geoff
>>>>>>> Neale,
>>>>>>> > Jim
>>>>>>> > Turney, and Tricia Sprankle. You can
>>>>>>> keep track
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> Secretary's
>>>>>>> > manual tally of votes here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1][2][4][6][7][8]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>> > In Liberty,
>>>>>>> > Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>> > Region 1 Representative,
>>>>>>> Libertarian
>>>>>>> National
>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>> (Alaska,
>>>>>>> > Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas,
>>>>>>> Montana,
>>>>>>> Utah,
>>>>>>> Wyoming,
>>>>>>> > Washington)
>>>>>>> > - [2]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> > Communications Director,
>>>>>>> [3]Libertarian
>>>>>>> Party of
>>>>>>> Colorado
>>>>>>> > Chair, LP Historical Preservation
>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>> > A haiku to the Statement of
>>>>>>> Principles:
>>>>>>> > We defend your rights
>>>>>>> > And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>> > Taxation is theft
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > References
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > 1.
>>>>>>> [3][5][7][8][9]https://tinyurl.co
>>>>>>> m/lncvoting
>>>>>>> > 2.
>>>>>>> mailto:[4]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> > 3.
>>>>>>> [5][6][8][9][10]http://www.lpcolor
>>>>>>> ado.org/
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>> - [6]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or
>>>>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation
>>>>>>> Committee -
>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>> 1.
>>>>>>> mailto:[7][9][10][11]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 2.
>>>>>>> [8][10][11][12]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 3.
>>>>>>> [9][11][12][13]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 4. mailto:[10]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> 5.
>>>>>>> [11][12][13][14]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 6. mailto:[12]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>> - [13]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or
>>>>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>> 1. mailto:[13][14][15]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>> 2. mailto:[14][15][16]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> 3. mailto:[15][16][17]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 4. [16][17][18]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 5. [17][18][19]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 6. [18][19][20]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 7. mailto:[19][20][21]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 8. [20][21][22]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 9. [21][22][23]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 10. mailto:[22]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> 11. [23][23][24]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 12. mailto:[24]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> 13. mailto:[25]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> JBH
>>>>>>> ------------
>>>>>>> Joe Bishop-Henchman
>>>>>>> LNC Member (At-Large)
>>>>>>> [26][24][25]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>> [27][25][26]www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>> - [28]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>> - [29]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>> 1. mailto:[26][27]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>> 2. mailto:[27][28]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>> 3. mailto:[28][29]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>> 4. mailto:[29][30]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> 5. mailto:[30][31]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 6. [31][32]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 7. [32][33]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 8. [33][34]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 9. mailto:[34][35]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 10. [35][36]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 11. [36][37]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 12. [37][38]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 13. mailto:[38][39]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>> 14. mailto:[39][40]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> 15. mailto:[40][41]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 16. [41][42]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 17. [42][43]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 18. [43][44]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 19. mailto:[44][45]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 20. [45][46]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 21. [46][47]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 22. mailto:[47]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> 23. [48][48]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 24. mailto:[49]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> 25. mailto:[50]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> 26. mailto:[51][49]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>> 27.
>>>>>>> [52][50]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>> 28. mailto:[53]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> 29. mailto:[54]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>> - [55]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>> 1. mailto:[51]sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>>>> 2. mailto:[52]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>> 3. mailto:[53]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>> 4. mailto:[54]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>> 5. mailto:[55]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> 6. mailto:[56]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 7. [57]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 8. [58]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 9. [59]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 10. mailto:[60]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 11. [61]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 12. [62]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 13. [63]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 14. mailto:[64]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>> 15. mailto:[65]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> 16. mailto:[66]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 17. [67]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 18. [68]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 19. [69]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 20. mailto:[70]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 21. [71]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 22. [72]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 23. [73]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 24. mailto:[74]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>> 25. [75]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>> 26. mailto:[76]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>> 27. mailto:[77]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>> 28. mailto:[78]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>> 29. mailto:[79]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> 30. mailto:[80]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 31. [81]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 32. [82]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 33. [83]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 34. mailto:[84]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 35. [85]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 36. [86]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 37. [87]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 38. mailto:[88]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>> 39. mailto:[89]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> 40. mailto:[90]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 41. [91]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 42. [92]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 43. [93]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 44. mailto:[94]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 45. [95]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 46. [96]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 47. mailto:[97]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> 48. [98]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 49. mailto:[99]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> 50. mailto:[100]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> 51. mailto:[101]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>> 52. [102]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>> 53. mailto:[103]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> 54. mailto:[104]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> 55. mailto:[105]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
>>>>>>> - [106]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> 2. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>>>> 3. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>> 4. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>> 5. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>> 6. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> 7. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 8. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 9. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 10. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 11. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 12. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 13. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 14. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 15. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>> 16. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> 17. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 18. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 19. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 20. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 21. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 22. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 23. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 24. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 25. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>> 26. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>> 27. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>> 28. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>> 29. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>> 30. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> 31. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 32. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 33. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 34. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 35. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 36. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 37. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 38. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 39. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>> 40. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> 41. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 42. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 43. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 44. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 45. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 46. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 47. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 48. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 49. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>> 50. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>> 51. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>>>> 52. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>> 53. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>> 54. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>> 55. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> 56. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 57. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 58. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 59. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 60. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 61. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 62. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 63. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 64. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>> 65. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> 66. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 67. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 68. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 69. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 70. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 71. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 72. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 73. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 74. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>> 75. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>> 76. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>> 77. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>> 78. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>> 79. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> 80. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 81. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 82. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 83. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 84. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 85. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 86. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 87. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 88. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>> 89. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> 90. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 91. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 92. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 93. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 94. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>> 95. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 96. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>> 97. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> 98. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>> 99. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> 100. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> 101. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>> 102. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>> 103. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> 104. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> 105. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> 106. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list