[Lnc-business] more JudComm data
Caryn Ann Harlos
caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
Mon Jul 16 23:01:33 EDT 2018
You are indeed the data-wrangler.
-Caryn Ann
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Richard Longstreth via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> Then you Alicia. Your efforts are very much appreciated.
>
> RTL
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018, 17:05 Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business
> <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
> Thank you Alicia!
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
> On 2018-07-16 19:54, Alicia Mattson via Lnc-business wrote:
> > Attached is the state-by-state breakdown of the Judicial Committee
> > results which were announced late at night on July 3.
> > I imagined that since I am not a candidate in this race, I
> could
> > wait a
> > bit longer until I had time to do an audit of this data, as I
> did
> > with
> > the At-Large data, before publishing it. That way any numbers
> > recorded
> > here which do not match a state chair's recollection of what
> they
> > turned in could be explained before the question even needed to
> be
> > asked.
> > As always, the convention secretary has a long to-do list
> following
> > the
> > convention. There were pending deadlines that I wanted to make
> on
> > other subjects, so after I published more detailed At-Large
> info, I
> > didn't take up the JudComm audit yet. The At-Large project
> took me
> > large portions of three days to complete, and I couldn't put
> off
> > certain other projects that long to do JudComm right then.
> > The LNC was already undertaking an email ballot to "recognize"
> the
> > top-7 finishers anyway. Now we know that motion did not pass,
> > mostly
> > due to concerns that it would be a rule violation, but now it
> seems
> > that the top-7 finishers are just declaring themselves to be
> the
> > Judicial Committee, though they did not meet the thresholds to
> be
> > elected.
> > The LNC now has an email ballot for an independent audit of the
> > Judicial Committee results.
> > I dunno. I'm just going to go ahead and put this out, even
> though I
> > haven't had time to audit it yet.
> > The JudComm tally happened without the intense time pressures
> under
> > which the At-Large tally happened. I am HOPING that means
> fewer
> > errors
> > were made in the tally, but we shall see. We were all very
> tired by
> > that point, so that could prove to have been as big a challenge
> as
> > the
> > time pressures were. None of the participants in the tally
> were
> > JudComm candidates.
> > I intend to conduct an audit of this data anyway, regardless of
> > whether
> > the LNC motion for an audit passes. I am not one of the
> candidates
> > for
> > Judicial Committee. I still have other things that should be
> done
> > first, but I think I can probably get to it within the next two
> > weeks.
> > Just know that if questions arise, the answers will have to
> wait
> > until
> > I can audit this.
> > There's just so much activity about this subject that I'll go
> ahead
> > and
> > put this out, for what it's worth.
> > -Alicia
>
> --
>
> Richard Longstreth
> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT, WA, WY)
> Libertarian National Committee
> [2]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 931.538.9300
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 2. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
>
--
--
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org> or Secretary at LP.org.
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
*We defend your rights*
*And oppose the use of force*
*Taxation is theft*
-------------- next part --------------
You are indeed the data-wrangler.
-Caryn Ann
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Richard Longstreth via Lnc-business
<[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
Then you Alicia. Your efforts are very much appreciated.
RTL
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018, 17:05 Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business
<[1][2]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
Thank you Alicia!
---
Elizabeth Van Horn
On 2018-07-16 19:54, Alicia Mattson via Lnc-business wrote:
> Attached is the state-by-state breakdown of the Judicial
Committee
> results which were announced late at night on July 3.
> I imagined that since I am not a candidate in this race, I
could
> wait a
> bit longer until I had time to do an audit of this data, as I
did
> with
> the At-Large data, before publishing it. That way any
numbers
> recorded
> here which do not match a state chair's recollection of what
they
> turned in could be explained before the question even needed
to
be
> asked.
> As always, the convention secretary has a long to-do list
following
> the
> convention. There were pending deadlines that I wanted to
make
on
> other subjects, so after I published more detailed At-Large
info, I
> didn't take up the JudComm audit yet. The At-Large project
took me
> large portions of three days to complete, and I couldn't put
off
> certain other projects that long to do JudComm right then.
> The LNC was already undertaking an email ballot to
"recognize"
the
> top-7 finishers anyway. Now we know that motion did not
pass,
> mostly
> due to concerns that it would be a rule violation, but now it
seems
> that the top-7 finishers are just declaring themselves to be
the
> Judicial Committee, though they did not meet the thresholds
to
be
> elected.
> The LNC now has an email ballot for an independent audit of
the
> Judicial Committee results.
> I dunno. I'm just going to go ahead and put this out, even
though I
> haven't had time to audit it yet.
> The JudComm tally happened without the intense time pressures
under
> which the At-Large tally happened. I am HOPING that means
fewer
> errors
> were made in the tally, but we shall see. We were all very
tired by
> that point, so that could prove to have been as big a
challenge
as
> the
> time pressures were. None of the participants in the tally
were
> JudComm candidates.
> I intend to conduct an audit of this data anyway, regardless
of
> whether
> the LNC motion for an audit passes. I am not one of the
candidates
> for
> Judicial Committee. I still have other things that should be
done
> first, but I think I can probably get to it within the next
two
> weeks.
> Just know that if questions arise, the answers will have to
wait
> until
> I can audit this.
> There's just so much activity about this subject that I'll go
ahead
> and
> put this out, for what it's worth.
> -Alicia
--
Richard Longstreth
Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT, WA,
WY)
Libertarian National Committee
[2][3]richard.longstreth at lp.org
931.538.9300
References
1. mailto:[4]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
2. mailto:[5]richard.longstreth at lp.org
--
--
In Liberty,
Caryn Ann Harlos
Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
- [6]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
We defend your rights
And oppose the use of force
Taxation is theft
References
1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
2. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
3. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
4. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
5. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
6. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list