[Lnc-business] DRAFT MINUTES OF 7/12/18 ExComm Meeting

Caryn Ann Harlos caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
Tue Jul 31 08:13:03 EDT 2018


Reminder today is the deadline for attending ex-comm member comment
prior to my preparation of the second draft.

-Caryn Ann

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:11 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos
<caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
> I note also, that there is a different process for auto-approval - so I will
> correct a few of the deadline dates above - the deadline on this one is 14
> days and not 15 days so objections from attending Ex Comm members are due
> July 31, 2018.
>
>
> LNC Policy Manual-Adopted 2018-06-30
>
> Meeting minutes for Executive Committee meetings may be promoted from draft
> status to official during the time between Executive Committee meetings as
> follows:
>
> Draft minutes for Executive Committee meetings shall be emailed to all LNC
> Members not more than 7 days after each meeting.24
>
> Absent objection from an Executive Committee member who attended the
> meeting, the minutes shall be deemed to be approved 14 days after their
> distribution.25
>
> Executive Committee minutes shall be distributed to all LNC Members and
> alternates within 7 days of such approval.
>
> The Secretary shall send an official copy of meeting minutes to staff within
> 7 days of the promotion of those minutes from draft to official status.
>
>
> - Caryn Ann
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you very much Jim, I agree with your comments on listing the LNC
>> members up top, that is a very good suggestion.  Yes, the green is for the
>> final form that is recorded in my motion tally ledger (I will clarify that
>> in the legend) - and yes this is something new that I do - I find it very
>> helpful and is something I do in many committees I work on.  It will
>> certainly make Chuck Moulton's end of term work easier:)  But I think it
>> also provides members with an in-progress way to assess their
>> representatives.
>>
>> I will incorporate your changes in the second draft after the review
>> period is up.
>>
>>
>> -Caryn Ann
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:23 PM, James Lark via Lnc-business
>> <lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear colleagues:
>>>
>>>     I hope all is well with you.  I am writing to offer comments and
>>> suggestions concerning the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting
>>> on July 12.
>>>
>>> 1)  Allow me to suggest that in listing the attendees who are not EC
>>> members, LNC members and alternates should be listed immediately after the
>>> list of EC members who are not in attendance.  Thus, I suggest that the
>>> following text be inserted immediately after the statement "Not Attending:
>>> Tim Hagan (Treasurer)":
>>>
>>> Other LNC participants were:  Alicia Mattson (At-Large representative),
>>> Elizabeth Van Horn (Region 3 representative), Whitney Bilyeu (Region 7
>>> representative), Susan Hogarth (Region 5 alternate).
>>>
>>>     I suggest this because many LP members consider it the responsibility
>>> of LNC members to attend EC meetings when possible. I believe listing the
>>> LNC members and alternates in attendance immediately after the list of those
>>> EC members not in attendance makes it easier to determine at a glance which
>>> LNC members were (and were not) present.  Incidentally, if I recall
>>> correctly, minutes of EC meetings during the 2016-2018 term listed (non-EC)
>>> LNC members and alternates in the manner I suggest.
>>>
>>> 2)  Ms. Bilyeu is listed in the gallery as the Region 3 representative;
>>> she is the Region 7 representative.  Also, Ms. Mattson is listed as an "At
>>> Large Representative" in the gallery, whereas Mr. Goldstein and Mr. Redpath
>>> are listed as "At-Large Representatives" in the list of EC members.  Allow
>>> me to suggest that there be consistency in hyphenation.
>>>
>>> 3)  In the legend, it is noted that substantive main motions are listed
>>> in green text.  Do I assume correctly that the green text will be used only
>>> for the final version (after amendment) of a substantive main motion?  I ask
>>> because I believe Mr. Redpath's motion qualifies as a substantive main
>>> motion, albeit one that was subsequently amended.
>>>
>>>     Please note that I reviewed the draft at warp speed (I had a little
>>> free time this afternoon following the lectures I gave to my courses).
>>> Thus, it is possible I have overlooked something worthy of note.
>>>
>>>     As always, thanks for your work for liberty.  I hope my comments are
>>> helpful to you.
>>>
>>>     Take care,
>>>     Jim
>>>
>>>     James W. Lark, III
>>>     Professor, Dept. of Systems and Information Engineering
>>>     Professor, Applied Mathematics Program, Dept. of Engineering and
>>> Society
>>>     Affiliated Faculty, Department of Statistics
>>>     University of Virginia
>>>
>>>     Advisor, The Liberty Coalition
>>>     University of Virginia
>>>
>>>     Region 5 Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>>> -----
>>>
>>> On 7/17/2018 12:19 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Attached are the first draft minutes from the July 12, 2018 ExComm
>>>>     Meeting. Please note that the LNC has a policy which allows
>>>> automatic
>>>>     approval (if no objection) under various time frames. See Policy
>>>> Manual
>>>>     Section 1.02.6 for the details of this process, which are the basis
>>>> for
>>>>     the dates at the top of page 1 of this draft. Any requests for
>>>>     correction are due within 15 days, by AUGUST 1, 2018. After that
>>>> time I
>>>>     will put out an updated draft which will become auto-approved absent
>>>> a
>>>>     qualifying objection (which would generate a new set of deadlines or
>>>>     postpone approval until the next LNC meeting).
>>>>     --
>>>>     In Liberty,
>>>>     Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>     Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary -
>>>>     [1]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>     Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
>>>>     A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>     We defend your rights
>>>>     And oppose the use of force
>>>>     Taxation is theft
>>>>
>>>> References
>>>>
>>>>     1. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> In Liberty,
>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary -
>> Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
>>
>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>> We defend your rights
>> And oppose the use of force
>> Taxation is theft
>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary - Caryn.Ann.
> Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
>
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> We defend your rights
> And oppose the use of force
> Taxation is theft



-- 
-- 
In Liberty,
Caryn Ann Harlos
Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary -
Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org

A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
We defend your rights
And oppose the use of force
Taxation is theft



More information about the Lnc-business mailing list