[Lnc-business] Fwd: Confidence in LNC restored

Caryn Ann Harlos caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
Tue Aug 14 04:37:58 EDT 2018


I think I have been pretty clear on what I want Susan, but I do hope you
are having a good time with your ridicule.  I do hope you are sharing this
same ridicule with a state in your own region who wrote me thanking me.
Are you representing your region here or just deciding to be obnoxious
about a genuine concern without asking them theirs?

I want the same clarity about communism and socialism that we had about
white nationalism.  I don't think I stuttered.

-Caryn Ann

On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 1:50 AM, Susan Hogarth <susan.hogarth at lp.org> wrote:

> “Doing X was bad, but it happened. So now we need to do *more* of X.
> Because X was bad.”
>
> Wait, what?
>
>
> If this body thinks that socialism is fine and dandy with the general
>    Party membership
>
>
>
> There really is room for more options than “DENOUNCE THE SOCIALISTS” and
> “this body thinks that socialism is fine and dandy”. The old “you’re with
> us or you’re with the socialists” line gets tedious.
>
> But setting those things aside; what do you want to happen here? You’ve
> denounced. Others have denounced. Do you want memes? Resolutions? Essays?
> Beheadings? Where is this heading?
>
> Susan Jane Hogarth
>
> Region 5 Alternate
>
> 919-906-2106
>
>
> On Aug 14, 2018 at 3:20 AM, <Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
> <lnc-business at hq.lp.org>> wrote:
>
>    If we ignored everything routinely I would not have as much of an issue
>    ignoring this.  But we haven't.  We (either as a Party or through very
>    public actions of LNC members) went after not only the alt-right but
>    prominent libertarian "celebertarians" who some thought were too cozy
>    with the alt right.  I think those fights picked went into the land of
>    petty but that's not my call - it wasn't me.  I do know that those
>    actions reverberated a lot of internal damage in our party with solid
>    Libertarians.
>    We entertained people who were wanting to be sure that Florida knew
>    that dis-affiliation was on the table due to a handful of loud-mouthed
>    neo-nazi types there and justified it because one of them - August
>    Invictus - had been a candidate under the L banner.  And it was a mere
>    handful of people none of whom ever made it on the national stage at
>    our convention to do a nazi salute.
>    WE HAVE AN OPEN COMMUNIST RUNNING UNDER THE L BANNER NOW.
>    The inconsistency is glaring.  Are we a leftist party?  I thought we
>    were neither left nor right but the hard push left is undeniable - be
>    honest with the membership if that is what we are.
>    I left the right.  I have no love for the right.  But much like the
>    South Park creator, that doesn't mean I now love the left.
>    If this body thinks that socialism is fine and dandy with the general
>    Party membership, we are woefully out of touch.
>    -Caryn Ann
>
>    On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 9:27 PM, brent.olsen--- via Lnc-business
>    <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
>      Sadly, this is not so.  I have spoken personally to three
>      individuals over the past week who had reservations about joining
>      the Libertarian Party because they were concerned that the
>      Libertarian Party was embracing socialism.  One of these
>      individuals, who I spoke with yesterday, does not know any other
>      Libertarians and had heard about the party from his friend at work,
>      the daughter of 1984 Libertarian Party presidential candidate David
>      Bergland.  He is a small town guy from Chico, California.  When he
>      spoke to me he had serious concerns that the Libertarian Party did
>      not support private property rights.  He does not use social media
>      at all, but when he looked up the Libertarian Party online some of
>      the first things that came to his attention were these LibSoc ideas
>      that are in opposition to private property rights.  He is one of
>      three individuals who I have talked to in the past week with these
>      concerns.  How many people are we losing because when they research
>      us they find this garbage?  This is becoming a more serious problem
>      and we can not in good conscience continue to ignore this.
>      In Liberty,
>      K. Brent Olsen, Psy.D.
>      Alternate, Region 4
>
>    On 2018-08-13 16:45, phillip.anderson--- via Lnc-business wrote:
>
>      Thankfully, the general public and electorate, and most of our
>         membership, are oblivious to these inside squabbles, and have a
>      pretty
>         good understanding of what libertarianism is and isn't from our
>         candidates. At least, whatever misconceptions the public might
>      have
>         come from non-libertarians, not from the  LNC or any caucus.
>         Get [1]Outlook for Android
>         On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 6:16 PM -0500, "Susan Hogarth via
>      Lnc-business"
>         <[2][2]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>       Isn’t it funny how a few trolls and their useful idiots can have us
>      at each oth
>      ers’ throats? Grandstanding, posturing, threatening to quit?
>      If it had been planned it couldn’t have worked better.
>      The LP has been around for over five decades, with plenty of
>      left/right fringers
>       trying to get a toehold. They will go, and until they do they are a
>      tiny minori
>      ty among us. The posturing and bulldogging gives them much more
>      credibility than
>       they would ever see within the party if they were simply shunned as
>      the fools t
>      hey are.
>      I think we should assume less of a defensive posture - that makes us
>      look weak.
>      I don’t think we need denouncements or proclamations. These guys
>      were roundly re
>      jected at the Convention. Why keep letting them determine our
>      discourse and set
>      the tone of our conversations?
>      Our words and actions should in almost every case describe what the
>      Libertarian
>      Party *is*, rather than be a response to what a few trolls want to
>      make it.
>      By all means celebrate capitalism. I want to see the Party doing
>      more of that. A
>      ll this talking about communism *associates* communism and the LP.
>      It makes it s
>      eem as if we are facing a huge existential crisis and perilously
>      close to adopti
>      ng socialism as the LP’s preferred economic ideology    We’re not.
>        Susan Jane Hogarth
>        Region 5 Alternate
>        919-906-2106 (tel:919-906-2106)
>
>      On Aug 13, 2018 at 6:56 PM,    wrote:
>       I will state that as a candidate in Utah, if we moved toward
>      socialism,
>      I would burn my card and denounce the Libertarian Party mid-race.
>      Principles are why I came here. If we don't stand up for them, I
>      will be
>      gone. That simple.
>      Principles are: non aggression. Self-ownership.
>      If we take that stand that non voluntary means are acceptable, such
>      as
>      the end result of socialism, then we are lost and I will be once
>      again
>      politically homeless. I have no problems with co-ops existing. You
>      do
>      you, but there must be the ability for a person to revoke consent
>      and
>      leave a commune in order for it to be voluntary. Since there has
>      been
>      advocacy for the forced taking of property, I cannot support that,
>      will
>      not support that, and anyone in Region 1 who has a problem with me
>      saying such is welcome to demand a recall of my post with their
>      chairs.
>      It is NOT divisive to call out aggression in ideology.
>      Craig Bowden
>      Region 1 Alternate
>      On 2018-08-13 13:10, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>      >  Since a criticism lodged was about distraction from candidates-
>      expect
>      >  letters from candidates who have expressed that it kept them in
>      the
>      >  race because they could point to national leaders repudiating
>      this.
>      >
>      >  If you don’t think association with communism will come out and
>      bite
>      >  our candidates in the ass, well....
>      >
>      >  I know that not everyone cares about the sheerly ideological
>      points
>      >  but
>      >  rather are election focused.
>      >
>      >  How is welcoming communists and looting business owners going to
>      >  help
>      >  us at the polls??
>      >
>      >  It isn’t.
>      >
>      >  -Caryn Ann
>      >
>      >  On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:55 PM Justin O'Donnell via
>      Lnc-business
>      >   <[1][3]lnc-business at hq.lp.org>  wrote:
>      >
>      >  I received the following email, espousing praise for Ms Harlos
>      and
>      >  Mr
>      >  Smith for their opposition to socialist influence in the LP.
>      >  ---
>      >  Yours in Liberty,
>      >  Justin O'Donnell
>      >  LNC Region 8 Representative
>      >  LPNH Alternate- LNC Platform Committee
>      >  Chair- LPNH Platform Committee
>      >  Candidate for US Congress, NH-2
>      >  [2][4]www.odonnell2018.org
>      >  -------- Original Message --------
>      >  Subject: Confidence in LNC restored
>      >  Date: 2018-08-13 14:48
>      >  From: demochamp  <[3][5]demochamp at yahoo.com>
>      >  To: [4][6]justin.odonnell at lp.org
>
>      >  Hello my name is Michael Cordova I am a Libertarian party member
>      >  from
>      >  Albuquerque New Mexico.
>      >  Last week after much consideration I renewed my membership to
>      >  the
>      >  Libertarian party
>      >  I had recently let my membership lapse for several months trying
>      >  to
>      >  figure out where I belong, due to the recent run for national
>      >  chair
>      >  by a
>      >  self proclaimed socialist as well as rhetoric from the
>      libertarian
>      >  socialist caucus. I had lost hope that I belonged in the LP. I do
>      >  not
>      >  support "bottom unity" and fail to understand how socialism of
>      any
>      >  kind
>      >  is compatible with the LP.
>      >  I am writing this e-mail because several members of the LNC
>      >  have
>      >  stepped up and spoken out against socialism and what I consider
>      an
>      >  attempted socialist takeover.
>      >  I would like to personally thank:
>      >  Caryn Ann Harlos  &  Joshua Smith
>      >  They both have renewed my confidence in the LP leadership and
>      have
>      >  giving me hope for the future of the party.
>      >  I can now tell my friends and family who were hesitant to join
>      >  the
>      >  party due to the ties to left wing economic policies like
>      Medicare
>      >  for
>      >  all and ideas like rent is theft and capitalism is murder, that
>      >  those
>      >  ideas and policies do not represent me nor the Libertarian party.
>      >  Thanks again.
>      >  Michael Cordova
>      >
>      >  --
>      >
>      >  --
>      >  In Liberty,
>      >  Caryn Ann Harlos
>      >  Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
>      >  - [5]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>      >  Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
>      >  A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>      >  We defend your rights
>      >  And oppose the use of force
>      >  Taxation is theft
>      >
>      >  References
>      >
>      >  1. mailto:[7]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>      >  2. [8]http://www.odonnell2018.org/
>      >  3. mailto:[9]demochamp at yahoo.com
>      >  4. mailto:[10]justin.odonnell at lp.org
>      >  5. mailto:[11]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>
>      References
>         1. [12]https://aka.ms/ghei36
>         2. mailto:[13]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>    --
>    --
>    In Liberty,
>    Caryn Ann Harlos
>    Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
>    - [14]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>    Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
>    A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>    We defend your rights
>    And oppose the use of force
>    Taxation is theft
>
> References
>
>    1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>    2. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>    3. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>    4. http://www.odonnell2018.org/
>    5. mailto:demochamp at yahoo.com
>    6. mailto:justin.odonnell at lp.org
>    7. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>    8. http://www.odonnell2018.org/
>    9. mailto:demochamp at yahoo.com
>   10. mailto:justin.odonnell at lp.org
>   11. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>   12. https://aka.ms/ghei36
>   13. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   14. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>
>


-- 
-- 
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org> or Secretary at LP.org.
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org

A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
*We defend your rights*
*And oppose the use of force*
*Taxation is theft*
-------------- next part --------------
   I think I have been pretty clear on what I want Susan, but I do hope
   you are having a good time with your ridicule.  I do hope you are
   sharing this same ridicule with a state in your own region who wrote me
   thanking me.  Are you representing your region here or just deciding to
   be obnoxious about a genuine concern without asking them theirs?
   I want the same clarity about communism and socialism that we had about
   white nationalism.  I don't think I stuttered.
   -Caryn Ann

   On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 1:50 AM, Susan Hogarth
   <[1]susan.hogarth at lp.org> wrote:

   “Doing X was bad, but it happened. So now we need to do *more* of X.
   Because X was bad.”
   Wait, what?


If this body thinks that socialism is fine and dandy with the general
   Party membership


   There really is room for more options than “DENOUNCE THE SOCIALISTS”
   and “this body thinks that socialism is fine and dandy”. The old
   “you’re with us or you’re with the socialists” line gets tedious.
   But setting those things aside; what do you want to happen here? You’ve
   denounced. Others have denounced. Do you want memes? Resolutions?
   Essays? Beheadings? Where is this heading?

   Susan Jane Hogarth

   Region 5 Alternate

   [2]919-906-2106

   On Aug 14, 2018 at 3:20 AM, <[3]Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business>
   wrote:


   If we ignored everything routinely I would not have as much of an issue
   ignoring this. But we haven't. We (either as a Party or through very
   public actions of LNC members) went after not only the alt-right but
   prominent libertarian "celebertarians" who some thought were too cozy
   with the alt right. I think those fights picked went into the land of
   petty but that's not my call - it wasn't me. I do know that those
   actions reverberated a lot of internal damage in our party with solid
   Libertarians.
   We entertained people who were wanting to be sure that Florida knew
   that dis-affiliation was on the table due to a handful of loud-mouthed
   neo-nazi types there and justified it because one of them - August
   Invictus - had been a candidate under the L banner. And it was a mere
   handful of people none of whom ever made it on the national stage at
   our convention to do a nazi salute.
   WE HAVE AN OPEN COMMUNIST RUNNING UNDER THE L BANNER NOW.
   The inconsistency is glaring. Are we a leftist party? I thought we
   were neither left nor right but the hard push left is undeniable - be
   honest with the membership if that is what we are.
   I left the right. I have no love for the right. But much like the
   South Park creator, that doesn't mean I now love the left.
   If this body thinks that socialism is fine and dandy with the general
   Party membership, we are woefully out of touch.
   -Caryn Ann
   On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 9:27 PM, brent.olsen--- via Lnc-business
   <[1][4]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
   Sadly, this is not so. I have spoken personally to three
   individuals over the past week who had reservations about joining
   the Libertarian Party because they were concerned that the
   Libertarian Party was embracing socialism. One of these
   individuals, who I spoke with yesterday, does not know any other
   Libertarians and had heard about the party from his friend at work,
   the daughter of 1984 Libertarian Party presidential candidate David
   Bergland. He is a small town guy from Chico, California. When he
   spoke to me he had serious concerns that the Libertarian Party did
   not support private property rights. He does not use social media
   at all, but when he looked up the Libertarian Party online some of
   the first things that came to his attention were these LibSoc ideas
   that are in opposition to private property rights. He is one of
   three individuals who I have talked to in the past week with these
   concerns. How many people are we losing because when they research
   us they find this garbage? This is becoming a more serious problem
   and we can not in good conscience continue to ignore this.
   In Liberty,
   K. Brent Olsen, Psy.D.
   Alternate, Region 4
   On 2018-08-13 16:45, phillip.anderson--- via Lnc-business wrote:
   Thankfully, the general public and electorate, and most of our
   membership, are oblivious to these inside squabbles, and have a
   pretty
   good understanding of what libertarianism is and isn't from our
   candidates. At least, whatever misconceptions the public might
   have
   come from non-libertarians, not from the LNC or any caucus.
   Get [1]Outlook for Android
   On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 6:16 PM -0500, "Susan Hogarth via
   Lnc-business"
   <[2][2][5]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
   Isn’t it funny how a few trolls and their useful idiots can have us
   at each oth
   ers’ throats? Grandstanding, posturing, threatening to quit?
   If it had been planned it couldn’t have worked better.
   The LP has been around for over five decades, with plenty of
   left/right fringers
   trying to get a toehold. They will go, and until they do they are a
   tiny minori
   ty among us. The posturing and bulldogging gives them much more
   credibility than
   they would ever see within the party if they were simply shunned as
   the fools t
   hey are.
   I think we should assume less of a defensive posture - that makes us
   look weak.
   I don’t think we need denouncements or proclamations. These guys
   were roundly re
   jected at the Convention. Why keep letting them determine our
   discourse and set
   the tone of our conversations?
   Our words and actions should in almost every case describe what the
   Libertarian
   Party *is*, rather than be a response to what a few trolls want to
   make it.
   By all means celebrate capitalism. I want to see the Party doing
   more of that. A
   ll this talking about communism *associates* communism and the LP.
   It makes it s
   eem as if we are facing a huge existential crisis and perilously
   close to adopti
   ng socialism as the LP’s preferred economic ideology We’re not.
   Susan Jane Hogarth
   Region 5 Alternate
   919-906-2106 (tel:919-906-2106)
   On Aug 13, 2018 at 6:56 PM, wrote:
   I will state that as a candidate in Utah, if we moved toward
   socialism,
   I would burn my card and denounce the Libertarian Party mid-race.
   Principles are why I came here. If we don't stand up for them, I
   will be
   gone. That simple.
   Principles are: non aggression. Self-ownership.
   If we take that stand that non voluntary means are acceptable, such
   as
   the end result of socialism, then we are lost and I will be once
   again
   politically homeless. I have no problems with co-ops existing. You
   do
   you, but there must be the ability for a person to revoke consent
   and
   leave a commune in order for it to be voluntary. Since there has
   been
   advocacy for the forced taking of property, I cannot support that,
   will
   not support that, and anyone in Region 1 who has a problem with me
   saying such is welcome to demand a recall of my post with their
   chairs.
   It is NOT divisive to call out aggression in ideology.
   Craig Bowden
   Region 1 Alternate
   On 2018-08-13 13:10, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
   > Since a criticism lodged was about distraction from candidates-
   expect
   > letters from candidates who have expressed that it kept them in
   the
   > race because they could point to national leaders repudiating
   this.
   >
   > If you don’t think association with communism will come out and
   bite
   > our candidates in the ass, well....
   >
   > I know that not everyone cares about the sheerly ideological
   points
   > but
   > rather are election focused.
   >
   > How is welcoming communists and looting business owners going to
   > help
   > us at the polls??
   >
   > It isn’t.
   >
   > -Caryn Ann
   >
   > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:55 PM Justin O'Donnell via
   Lnc-business
   > <[1][3][6]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
   >
   > I received the following email, espousing praise for Ms Harlos
   and
   > Mr
   > Smith for their opposition to socialist influence in the LP.
   > ---
   > Yours in Liberty,
   > Justin O'Donnell
   > LNC Region 8 Representative
   > LPNH Alternate- LNC Platform Committee
   > Chair- LPNH Platform Committee
   > Candidate for US Congress, NH-2
   > [2][4][7]www.odonnell2018.org
   > -------- Original Message --------
   > Subject: Confidence in LNC restored
   > Date: 2018-08-13 14:48
   > From: demochamp <[3][5][8]demochamp at yahoo.com>
   > To: [4][6][9]justin.odonnell at lp.org
   > Hello my name is Michael Cordova I am a Libertarian party member
   > from
   > Albuquerque New Mexico.
   > Last week after much consideration I renewed my membership to
   > the
   > Libertarian party
   > I had recently let my membership lapse for several months trying
   > to
   > figure out where I belong, due to the recent run for national
   > chair
   > by a
   > self proclaimed socialist as well as rhetoric from the
   libertarian
   > socialist caucus. I had lost hope that I belonged in the LP. I do
   > not
   > support "bottom unity" and fail to understand how socialism of
   any
   > kind
   > is compatible with the LP.
   > I am writing this e-mail because several members of the LNC
   > have
   > stepped up and spoken out against socialism and what I consider
   an
   > attempted socialist takeover.
   > I would like to personally thank:
   > Caryn Ann Harlos & Joshua Smith
   > They both have renewed my confidence in the LP leadership and
   have
   > giving me hope for the future of the party.
   > I can now tell my friends and family who were hesitant to join
   > the
   > party due to the ties to left wing economic policies like
   Medicare
   > for
   > all and ideas like rent is theft and capitalism is murder, that
   > those
   > ideas and policies do not represent me nor the Libertarian party.
   > Thanks again.
   > Michael Cordova
   >
   > --
   >
   > --
   > In Liberty,
   > Caryn Ann Harlos
   > Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
   > - [5]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
   > Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
   > A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
   > We defend your rights
   > And oppose the use of force
   > Taxation is theft
   >
   > References
   >
   > 1. mailto:[7][10]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   > 2. [8][11]http://www.odonnell2018.org/
   > 3. mailto:[9][12]demochamp at yahoo.com
   > 4. mailto:[10][13]justin.odonnell at lp.org
   > 5. mailto:[11]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
   References
   1. [12][14]https://aka.ms/ghei36
   2. mailto:[13][15]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   --
   --
   In Liberty,
   Caryn Ann Harlos
   Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
   - [14]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
   Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
   A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
   We defend your rights
   And oppose the use of force
   Taxation is theft
   References
   1. mailto:[16]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   2. mailto:[17]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   3. mailto:[18]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   4. [19]http://www.odonnell2018.org/
   5. mailto:[20]demochamp at yahoo.com
   6. mailto:[21]justin.odonnell at lp.org
   7. mailto:[22]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   8. [23]http://www.odonnell2018.org/
   9. mailto:[24]demochamp at yahoo.com
   10. mailto:[25]justin.odonnell at lp.org
   11. mailto:[26]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
   12. [27]https://aka.ms/ghei36
   13. mailto:[28]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   14. mailto:[29]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org

   --

   --
   In Liberty,
   Caryn Ann Harlos
   Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
   - [30]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
   Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
   A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
   We defend your rights
   And oppose the use of force
   Taxation is theft

References

   1. mailto:susan.hogarth at lp.org
   2. tel:919-906-2106
   3. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   4. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   5. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   6. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   7. http://www.odonnell2018.org/
   8. mailto:demochamp at yahoo.com
   9. mailto:justin.odonnell at lp.org
  10. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  11. http://www.odonnell2018.org/
  12. mailto:demochamp at yahoo.com
  13. mailto:justin.odonnell at lp.org
  14. https://aka.ms/ghei36
  15. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  16. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  17. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  18. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  19. http://www.odonnell2018.org/
  20. mailto:demochamp at yahoo.com
  21. mailto:justin.odonnell at lp.org
  22. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  23. http://www.odonnell2018.org/
  24. mailto:demochamp at yahoo.com
  25. mailto:justin.odonnell at lp.org
  26. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
  27. https://aka.ms/ghei36
  28. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  29. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
  30. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org


More information about the Lnc-business mailing list