[Lnc-business] DRAFT MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 29-30, 2018 LNC MEETING - V1

Caryn Ann Harlos caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
Mon Nov 26 07:41:12 EST 2018


I am going through this in batches and will address thusly and will submit
an amended draft.  *I deeply appreciate the advance review.*

*Re: counts in hand-raise votes*

I do not believe this is proper or necessary as the body did not order a
counted vote.  I consulted briefly on the RONR forum regarding this
question and so far the conversation affirms my position.  I will continue
to monitor my question there to see if anything further is added.  Thus, I
will not be making those changes.  If the count is important any member can
and should request a roll call vote or move that the count be placed in the
record.

*Re:*  *Appendix E v F*

This was corrected. Please note in the forthcoming draft that there is an
additional appendix added.

*Re: notations of amendments to agenda*

I do not believe my minutes insinuate that Nick has the power to
unilaterally amend the agenda. The item in question was properly noticed
and was inadvertantly not included and Nick was merely recognizing that
point.  However, this is a quibble I do not wish to expend energy on and
made the appropriate amendments to satisfy this objection.

*Re: notation of as amended*

It wasn't formally amended but rather I simply agreed, but not a point I
wish to quibble on so I added that language to satisfy this objection.

*Re: it's v its*

That was already corrected in the updated draft.

*To be continued...*




On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 1:35 AM Alicia Mattson via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

>    Skimming the subject lines of still-unread emails in my inbox, I see
>    that an updated draft of the September minutes has been sent today.  My
>    comments below are from looking at the first draft.  I have not
>    reviewed today’s update to see whether these have already been
>    addressed, so there may be some items listed here that are now moot.
>    No appendices were included with this draft of the September minutes.
>    I’m not inclined to approve things sight unseen.  Many of the
>    appendices were sent in advance, but three of the appendices have not
>    yet been seen by the LNC:
>                Appendix A – abstracts of public comments
>                Appendix B – updated list of potential conflicts of
>    interest
>                Appendix M – Candidate Support Committee report
>    There were a number of counted hand votes which were recorded to only
>    say whether the motion passed or failed but do not include the counted
>    vote totals:
>    p. 13, the Mattson amendment to 7/3/18 minutes was an 8-8 vote
>    p. 29, the Merced amendment to add “if any” to the Mattson amendment
>    regarding data to the Membership Support Committee was a 12-1 vote
>    p. 29, the Mattson amendment, as amended by the Merced motion, was an
>    11-2 vote
>    p. 29, the Redpath motion to change the next day’s starting time was a
>    7-6 vote
>    p. 35, motion 180930-6 was a 13-2 vote
>    p. 39, Lark motion to insert “non-voting” was an 11-2 vote
>    p. 39, Longstreth motion to insert the parenthetical phrase was a 6-7
>    vote
>    p. 42, Harlos motion to amend to add the phrase “and the Statement of
>    Principles” was a 13-0 vote
>    p. 42, Bilyeu motion to strike the original language was a 6-8 vote
>    p. 45, motion 180930-13 was a 13-2 vote
>    p. 46, Lark motion to postpone indefinitely was an 11-4 vote
>    p. 46, Merced amendment to strike the phrase “the entire LNC” was a 9-2
>    vote
>    p. 6 – Secretary’s Report is identified as being Appendix E, but later
>    in other locations it is referenced to be Appendix F
>    When amending the proposed agenda, we tend to operate very loosely, but
>    the draft minutes are phrased in a way that looks like the Chair
>    unilaterally has the power to dictate the agenda, rather than as though
>    we were making motions approved without objection by the LNC:
>    p. 8 “Mr. Sarwark noted a prior request…and instructed the LNC to note
>    that change”, rather than noting the change was made without objection
>    p. 8 add “without objection” before “The time allotted for the Special
>    Counsel’s Report…”
>    p. 8 “Mr. Sarwark added five (5) minutes to Mr. Hagan’s report…”,
>    rather than “Without objection, five (5) minutes were added…”
>    p. 8 change “Ms. Harlos requested ten (10) minutes…” to “Ms. Harlos
>    moved to add ten (10) minutes…” and “There was no objection.”
>    p. 13 motion 180929-4 has no “as amended” notation, though the prior
>    sentence indicates that an amendment was agreed to.
>    p. 14 in the penultimate bullet point, “it’s” should instead be “its”.
>    None of the election results tell the reader how many ballots were cast
>    on that election.  That’s critical information to calculating how many
>    votes constituted the majority necessary for election.
>    p. 16 indicates the rules for population of the Audit Committee come
>    from the LNC Policy Manual, but as the Policy Manual notes in footnote
>    27, that policy is inherited from LP Bylaws Article 9.2.
>    p. 17 indicates that “Mr. Goldstein nominated Mr. Redpath, but he is
>    ineligible as he is the Assistant Treasurer.”  I know of a bylaw which
>    makes Mr. Hagan ineligible, since he is an officer, but I know of no
>    rule which makes Mr. Redpath ineligible as the Assistant Treasurer.
>    I’m making a mental note for myself that the bylaws should probably be
>    amended to add such a rule in the future.
>    p. 17 indicates that I “formally objected” to a nomination, but I don’t
>    know what it means to “formally object”.  It sounds rather personal.  I
>    believe I raised a point of order regarding distinctions between
>    members and alternates.
>    p. 17 spells my name incorrectly when I appealed the ruling of the
>    chair.
>    p. 19 under Maine Ballot Access issues, it parenthetically indicates
>    the law is effectively requiring a “doubling” of the registration
>    roster by the November elections.  I don’t think that is practically
>    correct.  Doubling would be sufficient only if we had 100% Libertarian
>    turnout, which ain’t gonna happen.  It really requires much more than
>    doubling.  The previous sentence details the actual requirement, so I’d
>    recommend just striking the parenthetical.
>    p. 21 motion 180929-9 about opening nominations for the COC should
>    append “for the next term” to the end of the motion text.  It may sound
>    like Sam was making a trivial distinction, but it’s not since the
>    then-current term of the COC members had not yet expired, and that
>    language clarified that it was not to name the members for the tiny
>    remainder of the existing term, but was to take effect upon expiration
>    of their existing terms.
>    p. 24 says the LNC was unclear on the actual costs of Mr. Koerner’s
>    proposal, however he did give us some price points during the Q&A from
>    his presentation.  My notes say he priced it at $10k to license
>    trademarks for 6 months, plus 15% of merchandise sales, plus $120/hr
>    consulting for his time.
>    p. 27 Youth Engagement Committee – We did pass a motion to open
>    nominations for an election to appoint one and only one LNC member.
>    That does not preclude appointing another one later.  It only limits
>    that particular election to only choose one.  There were two people who
>    commented during debate that they wanted it limited to one total, but
>    the debate comments of two people are not binding decisions made by the
>    whole LNC.  Several phrases written into the text of the minutes take
>    that comment stated by a couple of people during debate and project it
>    onto the whole LNC as a binding prohibition, though I think it is a
>    personal interpretation.  Many LNC members later chose to also vote for
>    Dustin Nanna for this committee, so that likely indicates some
>    disagreement with the interpretation embedded into the minutes like
>    this:
>    p. 27, first paragraph, “LNC member involvement should be limited”, was
>    merely a debate comment made by two people, though this is worded as
>    though it was confirmed that the LNC as a whole agreed with it.
>    p. 27, Ms. Lee was elected as the “sole” LNC member
>    p. 27, Mr. Sarwark confirmed that voting for the “non-LNC” members
>    would take place… though I don’t believe that was stated that way
>    during the meeting
>    p. 36, inclusion of the phrase “comprising non-LNC members”
>    p. 36, identifying Ms. Lee as “the sole” LNC member
>    the footnote on p. 45
>    All of these can easily be rephrased to not take a position on an
>    interpretation question as though it is a statement of established
>    fact.
>    p. 31, my motion to apply an end date to email ballot 2018-19 was
>    merely to insert the phrase, “until the adjournment of the 2020 regular
>    convention”, but the draft minutes also format the next phrase “the
>    Libertarian National Committee” as text to be inserted, though that
>    text was part of the already-adopted language.
>    p. 32, the text of the “Neale Rule” being rescinded is not included in
>    the minutes.  It’s long enough that it probably makes sense to put it
>    in an appendix, however the wording of the actual text being rescinded
>    should be included in the record.  A reader would not otherwise have
>    any idea where to find the text of an unpublished rule.
>    p. 35, upon comment by Mr. Hagan, you indicated that the word “whether”
>    was intended to also be struck in first sentence of the motion, but it
>    is not struck in this draft or listed as an amendment adopted without
>    objection.
>    p. 35, did the Chair rule that my amendment had German
>    characteristics?  Perhaps “germaneness” is the word for which you were
>    searching.
>    p. 40, motion 180930-9 describes the general nature of the motion but
>    does not show the actual text of the motion.
>    p. 40, also on motion 180930-9 there is a typo with a colon where a
>    period was intended, plank “2:12” rather than “2.12”.
>    p. 47, “Discussion of LNC Goals for the 2018-2020 Term” was actually
>    done post-adjournment, though this looks like it happened during the
>    meeting.
>    p. 47, indicates adjournment was at 1:01 p.m., but my notes say it was
>    at 2:15 p.m., followed by the informal goals discussion which ended at
>    2:47 p.m.  I quickly checked a couple of external indicators (including
>    my text message history) to confirm the later adjournment time.
>    Large sections of the body of the minutes contain material which is
>    merely repetition of the staff/committee reports which will become
>    appendices.  In some cases, it appears that the text in the minutes is
>    copy/pasted directly from the reports, so I don’t understand the need
>    to have so many pages duplicated in part rather than just inviting them
>    to go to the appendix to see the full original.  Here are a few
>    examples:
>    p. 13+ bullet list of items from Staff Report
>    p. 15 another bullet list of items from staff report
>    p. 20 bullet list from COC report
>    p. 21 section about the post-convention survey
>    -Alicia
>    On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:31 AM Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
>    <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
>      Hello everyone attached please find the first draft of the minutes
>      for
>      the September 29-30, 2018 LNC meeting.  First I want to thank
>      everyone
>      for their forbearance for not submitting during the auto-approval
>      window due to my unexpected medical leave of absence.
>      So that we can hash out any changes ahead of and simply vote on
>      adoption at our December meeting, please advise asap of any
>      suggested
>      revisions or corrections.
>      --
>        In Liberty,
>      Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary -
>      Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>      Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
>      Call me at 561.523.2250 and follow my public figure page at
>      [2]facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
>      ====================================================================
>      =====
>      Peaceful Commerce With All Nations * Non-interventionism *
>      Re-Legalize
>      All Drugs * End Government Intrusion In The Bedroom * Repeal All Gun
>      Laws * Abolish All Taxation * Sound, Free-market Money * Abolish The
>      Fed * End Corporate & Individual Welfare * Abolish The IRS and
>      Repeal
>      the Income Tax * Privatize Transportation Infrastructure *
>      Free-market
>      Emergency Services * Open Migration * Transfer Government Schools To
>      The Private Sector * Eliminate Regulation *
>      VOTE LIBERTARIAN * 800-ELECT-US or [3]http://www.LP.org
>      ====================================================================
>      =====
>
> References
>
>    1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>    2. http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
>    3. http://www.LP.org/
>


-- 

*  In Liberty,*

*Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary *- Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org> or Secretary at LP.org.
*Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee* - LPedia at LP.org
Call me at 561.523.2250 and follow my public figure page at
facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/

=========================================================================
Peaceful Commerce With All Nations * Non-interventionism * Re-Legalize All
Drugs * End Government Intrusion In The Bedroom * Repeal All Gun Laws *
Abolish All Taxation * Sound, Free-market Money * Abolish The Fed * End
Corporate & Individual Welfare * Abolish The IRS and Repeal the Income Tax
* Privatize Transportation Infrastructure * Free-market Emergency Services
* Open Migration * Transfer Government Schools To The Private Sector *
Eliminate Regulation *

*VOTE LIBERTARIAN * 800-ELECT-US or http://www.LP.org <http://www.lp.org/>*
=========================================================================
-------------- next part --------------
   I am going through this in batches and will address thusly and will
   submit an amended draft.  I deeply appreciate the advance review.
   Re: counts in hand-raise votes
   I do not believe this is proper or necessary as the body did not order
   a counted vote.  I consulted briefly on the RONR forum regarding this
   question and so far the conversation affirms my position.  I will
   continue to monitor my question there to see if anything further is
   added.  Thus, I will not be making those changes.  If the count is
   important any member can and should request a roll call vote or move
   that the count be placed in the record.
   Re:  Appendix E v F
   This was corrected. Please note in the forthcoming draft that there is
   an additional appendix added.
   Re: notations of amendments to agenda
   I do not believe my minutes insinuate that Nick has the power to
   unilaterally amend the agenda. The item in question was properly
   noticed and was inadvertantly not included and Nick was merely
   recognizing that point.  However, this is a quibble I do not wish to
   expend energy on and made the appropriate amendments to satisfy this
   objection.
   Re: notation of as amended
   It wasn't formally amended but rather I simply agreed, but not a point
   I wish to quibble on so I added that language to satisfy this
   objection.
   Re: it's v its
   That was already corrected in the updated draft.
   To be continued...

   On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 1:35 AM Alicia Mattson via Lnc-business
   <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

        Skimming the subject lines of still-unread emails in my inbox, I
     see
        that an updated draft of the September minutes has been sent
     today.  My
        comments below are from looking at the first draft.  I have not
        reviewed today’s update to see whether these have already been
        addressed, so there may be some items listed here that are now
     moot.
        No appendices were included with this draft of the September
     minutes.
        I’m not inclined to approve things sight unseen.  Many of the
        appendices were sent in advance, but three of the appendices have
     not
        yet been seen by the LNC:
                    Appendix A – abstracts of public comments
                    Appendix B – updated list of potential conflicts of
        interest
                    Appendix M – Candidate Support Committee report
        There were a number of counted hand votes which were recorded to
     only
        say whether the motion passed or failed but do not include the
     counted
        vote totals:
        p. 13, the Mattson amendment to 7/3/18 minutes was an 8-8 vote
        p. 29, the Merced amendment to add “if any” to the Mattson
     amendment
        regarding data to the Membership Support Committee was a 12-1
     vote
        p. 29, the Mattson amendment, as amended by the Merced motion,
     was an
        11-2 vote
        p. 29, the Redpath motion to change the next day’s starting time
     was a
        7-6 vote
        p. 35, motion 180930-6 was a 13-2 vote
        p. 39, Lark motion to insert “non-voting” was an 11-2 vote
        p. 39, Longstreth motion to insert the parenthetical phrase was a
     6-7
        vote
        p. 42, Harlos motion to amend to add the phrase “and the
     Statement of
        Principles” was a 13-0 vote
        p. 42, Bilyeu motion to strike the original language was a 6-8
     vote
        p. 45, motion 180930-13 was a 13-2 vote
        p. 46, Lark motion to postpone indefinitely was an 11-4 vote
        p. 46, Merced amendment to strike the phrase “the entire LNC” was
     a 9-2
        vote
        p. 6 – Secretary’s Report is identified as being Appendix E, but
     later
        in other locations it is referenced to be Appendix F
        When amending the proposed agenda, we tend to operate very
     loosely, but
        the draft minutes are phrased in a way that looks like the Chair
        unilaterally has the power to dictate the agenda, rather than as
     though
        we were making motions approved without objection by the LNC:
        p. 8 “Mr. Sarwark noted a prior request…and instructed the LNC to
     note
        that change”, rather than noting the change was made without
     objection
        p. 8 add “without objection” before “The time allotted for the
     Special
        Counsel’s Report…”
        p. 8 “Mr. Sarwark added five (5) minutes to Mr. Hagan’s report…”,
        rather than “Without objection, five (5) minutes were added…”
        p. 8 change “Ms. Harlos requested ten (10) minutes…” to “Ms.
     Harlos
        moved to add ten (10) minutes…” and “There was no objection.”
        p. 13 motion 180929-4 has no “as amended” notation, though the
     prior
        sentence indicates that an amendment was agreed to.
        p. 14 in the penultimate bullet point, “it’s” should instead be
     “its”.
        None of the election results tell the reader how many ballots
     were cast
        on that election.  That’s critical information to calculating how
     many
        votes constituted the majority necessary for election.
        p. 16 indicates the rules for population of the Audit Committee
     come
        from the LNC Policy Manual, but as the Policy Manual notes in
     footnote
        27, that policy is inherited from LP Bylaws Article 9.2.
        p. 17 indicates that “Mr. Goldstein nominated Mr. Redpath, but he
     is
        ineligible as he is the Assistant Treasurer.”  I know of a bylaw
     which
        makes Mr. Hagan ineligible, since he is an officer, but I know of
     no
        rule which makes Mr. Redpath ineligible as the Assistant
     Treasurer.
        I’m making a mental note for myself that the bylaws should
     probably be
        amended to add such a rule in the future.
        p. 17 indicates that I “formally objected” to a nomination, but I
     don’t
        know what it means to “formally object”.  It sounds rather
     personal.  I
        believe I raised a point of order regarding distinctions between
        members and alternates.
        p. 17 spells my name incorrectly when I appealed the ruling of
     the
        chair.
        p. 19 under Maine Ballot Access issues, it parenthetically
     indicates
        the law is effectively requiring a “doubling” of the registration
        roster by the November elections.  I don’t think that is
     practically
        correct.  Doubling would be sufficient only if we had 100%
     Libertarian
        turnout, which ain’t gonna happen.  It really requires much more
     than
        doubling.  The previous sentence details the actual requirement,
     so I’d
        recommend just striking the parenthetical.
        p. 21 motion 180929-9 about opening nominations for the COC
     should
        append “for the next term” to the end of the motion text.  It may
     sound
        like Sam was making a trivial distinction, but it’s not since the
        then-current term of the COC members had not yet expired, and
     that
        language clarified that it was not to name the members for the
     tiny
        remainder of the existing term, but was to take effect upon
     expiration
        of their existing terms.
        p. 24 says the LNC was unclear on the actual costs of Mr.
     Koerner’s
        proposal, however he did give us some price points during the Q&A
     from
        his presentation.  My notes say he priced it at $10k to license
        trademarks for 6 months, plus 15% of merchandise sales, plus
     $120/hr
        consulting for his time.
        p. 27 Youth Engagement Committee – We did pass a motion to open
        nominations for an election to appoint one and only one LNC
     member.
        That does not preclude appointing another one later.  It only
     limits
        that particular election to only choose one.  There were two
     people who
        commented during debate that they wanted it limited to one total,
     but
        the debate comments of two people are not binding decisions made
     by the
        whole LNC.  Several phrases written into the text of the minutes
     take
        that comment stated by a couple of people during debate and
     project it
        onto the whole LNC as a binding prohibition, though I think it is
     a
        personal interpretation.  Many LNC members later chose to also
     vote for
        Dustin Nanna for this committee, so that likely indicates some
        disagreement with the interpretation embedded into the minutes
     like
        this:
        p. 27, first paragraph, “LNC member involvement should be
     limited”, was
        merely a debate comment made by two people, though this is worded
     as
        though it was confirmed that the LNC as a whole agreed with it.
        p. 27, Ms. Lee was elected as the “sole” LNC member
        p. 27, Mr. Sarwark confirmed that voting for the “non-LNC”
     members
        would take place… though I don’t believe that was stated that way
        during the meeting
        p. 36, inclusion of the phrase “comprising non-LNC members”
        p. 36, identifying Ms. Lee as “the sole” LNC member
        the footnote on p. 45
        All of these can easily be rephrased to not take a position on an
        interpretation question as though it is a statement of
     established
        fact.
        p. 31, my motion to apply an end date to email ballot 2018-19 was
        merely to insert the phrase, “until the adjournment of the 2020
     regular
        convention”, but the draft minutes also format the next phrase
     “the
        Libertarian National Committee” as text to be inserted, though
     that
        text was part of the already-adopted language.
        p. 32, the text of the “Neale Rule” being rescinded is not
     included in
        the minutes.  It’s long enough that it probably makes sense to
     put it
        in an appendix, however the wording of the actual text being
     rescinded
        should be included in the record.  A reader would not otherwise
     have
        any idea where to find the text of an unpublished rule.
        p. 35, upon comment by Mr. Hagan, you indicated that the word
     “whether”
        was intended to also be struck in first sentence of the motion,
     but it
        is not struck in this draft or listed as an amendment adopted
     without
        objection.
        p. 35, did the Chair rule that my amendment had German
        characteristics?  Perhaps “germaneness” is the word for which you
     were
        searching.
        p. 40, motion 180930-9 describes the general nature of the motion
     but
        does not show the actual text of the motion.
        p. 40, also on motion 180930-9 there is a typo with a colon where
     a
        period was intended, plank “2:12” rather than “2.12”.
        p. 47, “Discussion of LNC Goals for the 2018-2020 Term” was
     actually
        done post-adjournment, though this looks like it happened during
     the
        meeting.
        p. 47, indicates adjournment was at 1:01 p.m., but my notes say
     it was
        at 2:15 p.m., followed by the informal goals discussion which
     ended at
        2:47 p.m.  I quickly checked a couple of external indicators
     (including
        my text message history) to confirm the later adjournment time.
        Large sections of the body of the minutes contain material which
     is
        merely repetition of the staff/committee reports which will
     become
        appendices.  In some cases, it appears that the text in the
     minutes is
        copy/pasted directly from the reports, so I don’t understand the
     need
        to have so many pages duplicated in part rather than just
     inviting them
        to go to the appendix to see the full original.  Here are a few
        examples:
        p. 13+ bullet list of items from Staff Report
        p. 15 another bullet list of items from staff report
        p. 20 bullet list from COC report
        p. 21 section about the post-convention survey
        -Alicia
        On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:31 AM Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
        <[1][2]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
          Hello everyone attached please find the first draft of the
     minutes
          for
          the September 29-30, 2018 LNC meeting.  First I want to thank
          everyone
          for their forbearance for not submitting during the
     auto-approval
          window due to my unexpected medical leave of absence.
          So that we can hash out any changes ahead of and simply vote on
          adoption at our December meeting, please advise asap of any
          suggested
          revisions or corrections.
          --
            In Liberty,
          Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
     -
          Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
          Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
          Call me at 561.523.2250 and follow my public figure page at
          [2][3]facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/

     ====================================================================
          =====
          Peaceful Commerce With All Nations * Non-interventionism *
          Re-Legalize
          All Drugs * End Government Intrusion In The Bedroom * Repeal
     All Gun
          Laws * Abolish All Taxation * Sound, Free-market Money *
     Abolish The
          Fed * End Corporate & Individual Welfare * Abolish The IRS and
          Repeal
          the Income Tax * Privatize Transportation Infrastructure *
          Free-market
          Emergency Services * Open Migration * Transfer Government
     Schools To
          The Private Sector * Eliminate Regulation *
          VOTE LIBERTARIAN * 800-ELECT-US or [3][4]http://www.LP.org

     ====================================================================
          =====
     References
        1. mailto:[5]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
        2. [6]http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
        3. [7]http://www.LP.org/

   --

     In Liberty,
   [uc?id=1DeRjq-L8dvRZabgEG94VkkUvjoHatcfP&export=download]
   Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
   Secretary - [8]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
   Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
   Call me at 561.523.2250 and follow my public figure page
   at [9]facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
   =======================================================================
   ==
   Peaceful Commerce With All Nations * Non-interventionism * Re-Legalize
   All Drugs * End Government Intrusion In The Bedroom * Repeal All Gun
   Laws * Abolish All Taxation * Sound, Free-market Money * Abolish The
   Fed * End Corporate & Individual Welfare * Abolish The IRS and Repeal
   the Income Tax * Privatize Transportation Infrastructure * Free-market
   Emergency Services * Open Migration * Transfer Government Schools To
   The Private Sector * Eliminate Regulation *
   VOTE LIBERTARIAN * 800-ELECT-US or [10]http://www.LP.org
   =======================================================================
   ==

References

   1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   2. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   3. http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
   4. http://www.LP.org/
   5. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   6. http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
   7. http://www.LP.org/
   8. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
   9. http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
  10. http://www.lp.org/


More information about the Lnc-business mailing list