[Lnc-business] Koerner proposal
Whitney Bilyeu
whitneycb76 at gmail.com
Sat Dec 22 11:45:16 EST 2018
Unless there is a new proposal on the table, I don't see what there is to
discuss. The LNC rejected the original proposal, and no one offered
amendments. It seems there is little to no overall interest in furthering
this.
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018, 9:40 AM Richard Longstreth via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org wrote:
> Here's my perspective:
> A proposal was brought forth.
> LNC discussed and gave feedback as to several changes that each of us
> would be more likely to consider.
> Presumably a counter offer was made with those requests or thoughts.
> The LNC formally rejected the original proposal.
> As far as I see it, I'm waiting on Koerner to get back to us with a
> reasonable proposal stemming from the feedback he has already received.
> Until I see another proposal, I don't have anything more to discuss on
> this because the original was rejected. I would rather the LP hold a
> contest to come up with voluntarily submitted branding ideas rather
> than pursue this idea where the contract was unreasonable and no
> response is being made to our public comment and our input for a
> renegotiation. Either Koerner wants to pursue this or not, I will not
> be further pursuing it for him.
> If the lack of negotiation stems from nobody on our end formally
> reaching out and negotiating the contract with him, despite his
> efforts, that is very irresponsible but the only person charged to do
> that from this body is Nick and I trust he has done what he has been
> charged with. I also trust that he hasn't gotten responses which is why
> nothing else has come before the body.
> I am very open and willing to discuss other proposals he brings forth,
> however, at this time, there is nothing on the table.
> Richard Longstreth
> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT, WA, WY)
> Libertarian National Committee
> [1]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 931.538.9300
> Sent from my Mobile Device
>
> On Dec 21, 2018 23:18, "Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business"
> <[2]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
> As I think I made clear during our last meeting, I was really
> unhappy
> with how we handled this (praxis, not necessarily the result).
> Where
> are we at? Is the Chair still engaging in negotiations? I ask
> that
> this be added to the e-agenda for the January meeting.
> --
> In Liberty,
> [uc?id=1DeRjq-L8dvRZabgEG94VkkUvjoHatcfP&export=download]
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
> - [1]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
> Call me at 561.523.2250 and follow my public figure page
> at [2][3]facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
>
> ====================================================================
> ===
> ==
> Peaceful Commerce With All Nations * Non-interventionism *
> Re-Legalize
> All Drugs * End Government Intrusion In The Bedroom * Repeal All
> Gun
> Laws * Abolish All Taxation * Sound, Free-market Money * Abolish
> The
> Fed * End Corporate & Individual Welfare * Abolish The IRS and
> Repeal
> the Income Tax * Privatize Transportation Infrastructure *
> Free-market
> Emergency Services * Open Migration * Transfer Government Schools
> To
> The Private Sector * Eliminate Regulation *
> VOTE LIBERTARIAN * 800-ELECT-US or [3][4]http://www.LP.org
>
> ====================================================================
> ===
> ==
> References
> 1. mailto:[5]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 2. [6]http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
> 3. [7]http://www.lp.org/
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 2. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 3. http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
> 4. http://www.LP.org/
> 5. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 6. http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
> 7. http://www.lp.org/
>
-------------- next part --------------
Unless there is a new proposal on the table, I don't see what there is
to discuss. The LNC rejected the original proposal, and no one offered
amendments. It seems there is little to no overall interest in
furthering this.
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018, 9:40 AM Richard Longstreth via Lnc-business
<[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org wrote:
Here's my perspective:
A proposal was brought forth.
LNC discussed and gave feedback as to several changes that each
of us
would be more likely to consider.
Presumably a counter offer was made with those requests or
thoughts.
The LNC formally rejected the original proposal.
As far as I see it, I'm waiting on Koerner to get back to us with
a
reasonable proposal stemming from the feedback he has already
received.
Until I see another proposal, I don't have anything more to
discuss on
this because the original was rejected. I would rather the LP
hold a
contest to come up with voluntarily submitted branding ideas
rather
than pursue this idea where the contract was unreasonable and no
response is being made to our public comment and our input for a
renegotiation. Either Koerner wants to pursue this or not, I will
not
be further pursuing it for him.
If the lack of negotiation stems from nobody on our end formally
reaching out and negotiating the contract with him, despite his
efforts, that is very irresponsible but the only person charged
to do
that from this body is Nick and I trust he has done what he has
been
charged with. I also trust that he hasn't gotten responses which
is why
nothing else has come before the body.
I am very open and willing to discuss other proposals he brings
forth,
however, at this time, there is nothing on the table.
Richard Longstreth
Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT, WA,
WY)
Libertarian National Committee
[1][2]richard.longstreth at lp.org
931.538.9300
Sent from my Mobile Device
On Dec 21, 2018 23:18, "Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business"
<[2][3]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
As I think I made clear during our last meeting, I was
really
unhappy
with how we handled this (praxis, not necessarily the
result).
Where
are we at? Is the Chair still engaging in negotiations? I
ask
that
this be added to the e-agenda for the January meeting.
--
In Liberty,
[uc?id=1DeRjq-L8dvRZabgEG94VkkUvjoHatcfP&export=download]
Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
Secretary
- [1]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
Call me at 561.523.2250 and follow my public figure page
at [2][3][4]facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
====================================================================
===
==
Peaceful Commerce With All Nations * Non-interventionism *
Re-Legalize
All Drugs * End Government Intrusion In The Bedroom * Repeal
All
Gun
Laws * Abolish All Taxation * Sound, Free-market Money *
Abolish
The
Fed * End Corporate & Individual Welfare * Abolish The IRS
and
Repeal
the Income Tax * Privatize Transportation Infrastructure *
Free-market
Emergency Services * Open Migration * Transfer Government
Schools
To
The Private Sector * Eliminate Regulation *
VOTE LIBERTARIAN * 800-ELECT-US or
[3][4][5]http://www.LP.org
====================================================================
===
==
References
1. mailto:[5]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
2. [6][6]http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
3. [7][7]http://www.lp.org/
References
1. mailto:[8]richard.longstreth at lp.org
2. mailto:[9]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
3. [10]http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
4. [11]http://www.LP.org/
5. mailto:[12]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
6. [13]http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
7. [14]http://www.lp.org/
References
1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
2. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
3. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
4. http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
5. http://www.LP.org/
6. http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
7. http://www.lp.org/
8. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
9. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
10. http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
11. http://www.LP.org/
12. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
13. http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
14. http://www.lp.org/
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list