[Lnc-business] Koerner proposal
Joe Bishop-Henchman
joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
Sat Dec 22 14:38:58 EST 2018
I agree with Ms. Bilyeu.
I'll add that we are nearly $100,000 behind on bills, so my preference
is that we not pursue supplemental expenses or staff activity
directives that are not fundraising related, at least until our bill
backlog is stabilized. All new initiatives involve some amount of risk
and I personally prefer we be risk-averse until we are no longer doing
the equivalent of putting the electric bill into the water company
envelope each month.
Marketing initiatives are at best indirectly related to fundraising,
and it's hard for me to see how this campaign will generate more
revenue than its costs (both dollar and staff time) in the near future
even if the costs are minimal. If we have $40,000 to burn let's hire
another full time fundraiser to work the phones.
JBH
On Dec 22, 2018 11:45 AM, Whitney Bilyeu via Lnc-business
<lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
Unless there is a new proposal on the table, I don't see what there
is to
discuss. The LNC rejected the original proposal, and no one offered
amendments. It seems there is little to no overall interest in
furthering
this.
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018, 9:40 AM Richard Longstreth via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org wrote:
> Here's my perspective:
> A proposal was brought forth.
> LNC discussed and gave feedback as to several changes that each
of us
> would be more likely to consider.
> Presumably a counter offer was made with those requests or
thoughts.
> The LNC formally rejected the original proposal.
> As far as I see it, I'm waiting on Koerner to get back to us
with a
> reasonable proposal stemming from the feedback he has already
received.
> Until I see another proposal, I don't have anything more to
discuss on
> this because the original was rejected. I would rather the LP
hold a
> contest to come up with voluntarily submitted branding ideas
rather
> than pursue this idea where the contract was unreasonable and
no
> response is being made to our public comment and our input for
a
> renegotiation. Either Koerner wants to pursue this or not, I
will not
> be further pursuing it for him.
> If the lack of negotiation stems from nobody on our end
formally
> reaching out and negotiating the contract with him, despite his
> efforts, that is very irresponsible but the only person charged
to do
> that from this body is Nick and I trust he has done what he has
been
> charged with. I also trust that he hasn't gotten responses
which is why
> nothing else has come before the body.
> I am very open and willing to discuss other proposals he brings
forth,
> however, at this time, there is nothing on the table.
> Richard Longstreth
> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT,
WA, WY)
> Libertarian National Committee
> [1]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 931.538.9300
> Sent from my Mobile Device
>
> On Dec 21, 2018 23:18, "Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business"
> <[2]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
> As I think I made clear during our last meeting, I was
really
> unhappy
> with how we handled this (praxis, not necessarily the
result).
> Where
> are we at? Is the Chair still engaging in negotiations?
I ask
> that
> this be added to the e-agenda for the January meeting.
> --
> In Liberty,
>
[uc?id=1DeRjq-L8dvRZabgEG94VkkUvjoHatcfP&export=download]
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
Secretary
> - [1]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
LPedia at LP.org
> Call me at 561.523.2250 and follow my public figure page
> at [2][3]facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
>
>
====================================================================
> ===
> ==
> Peaceful Commerce With All Nations * Non-interventionism *
> Re-Legalize
> All Drugs * End Government Intrusion In The Bedroom *
Repeal All
> Gun
> Laws * Abolish All Taxation * Sound, Free-market Money *
Abolish
> The
> Fed * End Corporate & Individual Welfare * Abolish The IRS
and
> Repeal
> the Income Tax * Privatize Transportation Infrastructure *
> Free-market
> Emergency Services * Open Migration * Transfer Government
Schools
> To
> The Private Sector * Eliminate Regulation *
> VOTE LIBERTARIAN * 800-ELECT-US or [3][4]http://www.LP.org
>
>
====================================================================
> ===
> ==
> References
> 1. mailto:[5]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 2. [6]http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
> 3. [7]http://www.lp.org/
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 2. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 3. http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
> 4. http://www.LP.org/
> 5. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 6. http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
> 7. http://www.lp.org/
>
Unless there is a new proposal on the table, I don't see what
there is
to discuss. The LNC rejected the original proposal, and no one
offered
amendments. It seems there is little to no overall interest in
furthering this.
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018, 9:40 AM Richard Longstreth via Lnc-business
<[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org wrote:
Here's my perspective:
A proposal was brought forth.
LNC discussed and gave feedback as to several changes that
each
of us
would be more likely to consider.
Presumably a counter offer was made with those requests or
thoughts.
The LNC formally rejected the original proposal.
As far as I see it, I'm waiting on Koerner to get back to us
with
a
reasonable proposal stemming from the feedback he has
already
received.
Until I see another proposal, I don't have anything more to
discuss on
this because the original was rejected. I would rather the
LP
hold a
contest to come up with voluntarily submitted branding ideas
rather
than pursue this idea where the contract was unreasonable
and no
response is being made to our public comment and our input
for a
renegotiation. Either Koerner wants to pursue this or not, I
will
not
be further pursuing it for him.
If the lack of negotiation stems from nobody on our end
formally
reaching out and negotiating the contract with him, despite
his
efforts, that is very irresponsible but the only person
charged
to do
that from this body is Nick and I trust he has done what he
has
been
charged with. I also trust that he hasn't gotten responses
which
is why
nothing else has come before the body.
I am very open and willing to discuss other proposals he
brings
forth,
however, at this time, there is nothing on the table.
Richard Longstreth
Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT,
WA,
WY)
Libertarian National Committee
[1][2]richard.longstreth at lp.org
931.538.9300
Sent from my Mobile Device
On Dec 21, 2018 23:18, "Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business"
<[2][3]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
As I think I made clear during our last meeting, I was
really
unhappy
with how we handled this (praxis, not necessarily the
result).
Where
are we at? Is the Chair still engaging in
negotiations? I
ask
that
this be added to the e-agenda for the January meeting.
--
In Liberty,
[uc?id=1DeRjq-L8dvRZabgEG94VkkUvjoHatcfP&export=download]
Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
Secretary
- [1]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
LPedia at LP.org
Call me at 561.523.2250 and follow my public figure
page
at [2][3][4]facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
====================================================================
===
==
Peaceful Commerce With All Nations *
Non-interventionism *
Re-Legalize
All Drugs * End Government Intrusion In The Bedroom *
Repeal
All
Gun
Laws * Abolish All Taxation * Sound, Free-market Money
*
Abolish
The
Fed * End Corporate & Individual Welfare * Abolish The
IRS
and
Repeal
the Income Tax * Privatize Transportation
Infrastructure *
Free-market
Emergency Services * Open Migration * Transfer
Government
Schools
To
The Private Sector * Eliminate Regulation *
VOTE LIBERTARIAN * 800-ELECT-US or
[3][4][5]http://www.LP.org
====================================================================
===
==
References
1. mailto:[5]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
2. [6][6]http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
3. [7][7]http://www.lp.org/
References
1. mailto:[8]richard.longstreth at lp.org
2. mailto:[9]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
3. [10]http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
4. [11]http://www.LP.org/
5. mailto:[12]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
6. [13]http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
7. [14]http://www.lp.org/
References
1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
2. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
3. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
4. http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
5. http://www.LP.org/
6. http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
7. http://www.lp.org/
8. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
9. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
10. http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
11. http://www.LP.org/
12. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
13. http://facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
14. http://www.lp.org/
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list