[Lnc-business] Fwd: Re: Justin Amash Tweet Addendum to prior email

[francis.wendt at lp.org]

Ms. Van Horn,

I would like to correct you on one point. 

Yes, questions are always allowed; however, their openness to debate is at
the will of the body, not simply because the question was asked. 

I specifically chose not to respond to Mr. Ford's comments because of the
value I placed in them and to respect Mr. Ford's opinions.  I do need to
point out that just because the discussion is being had does not mean that
it is appropriate for the business list. If this should come to a motion, so
be it, but I do not wish to see an email fight in my inbox. As this matter
is squarely in the purview of the APRC may I suggest a polite inquiry to Ms.
Bilyeu in private, or at the very least hold the public discourse in Reno. I
believe the issue will keep until then, because social media by its very
nature is a "flavor of the day," and only grabs people at the surface level.

Best Regards,


Francis Wendt
LNC Region 1 Alternate
406.595.5111



-----Original Message-----
From: Lnc-business <lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org> On Behalf Of Elizabeth
Van Horn via Lnc-business
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 5:41 PM
To: lnc-business at hq.lp.org
Cc: Elizabeth Van Horn <elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org>
Subject: [Lnc-business] Fwd: Re: Justin Amash Tweet Addendum to prior email

Forwarded to public list

-------- Original Message -------- 

 		SUBJECT:
 		Re: [Lnc-business] Justin Amash Tweet Addendum to prior
email

 		DATE:
 		2020-01-21 19:40

 		FROM:
 		Elizabeth Van Horn <elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org>

 		TO:
 		pat.ford at lp.org

What question?  Where you misinterpret an LP tweet?

Or the one where you add your own spin with words like "Lionization"? 
(Which is nonsense)

Pat, you can ask questions. Whether they're important or not is open for
debate.

---
Elizabeth Van Horn
LNC Region 3 Representative (IN, MI, OH, KY)