[Lnc-business] Fwd: Re: Justin Amash Tweet Addendum to prior email

[Elizabeth Van Horn]

Francis Wendt,

1) A discussion on this email isn't a fight.  

2) Because of the "flavor of the day" concept, I do choose to respond to
Pat Ford's opinion. 

3) This list is public so that our LP members may read it.  When there's
an email that I think is purposefully misinterpreting, and/or casting a
wrong light, I shall respond.  To not do so, let's the other opinion
stand.   

5)  I'd already said all that I needed to say, _prior_ to your
commentary on this topic.  Often we have a person who interjects to stop
others from discussing a topic, and they thereby keep the topic going.  

Information: I don't use use the title "Ms.".  Please address me by my
name.  As that is sufficient. Other LNC members on this list have seen
me make this request, and I realize that you're new to the list and
didn't know.  So, this shall be your opportunity to read it. : )  
(Also, if you have a preference for how you wish to be addressed, let
me, and/or others know.) 

Kind regards, 
Elizabeth Van Horn

---
Elizabeth Van Horn

On 2020-01-21 22:58, francis.wendt at lp.org wrote: 

> Ms. Van Horn,
> 
> I would like to correct you on one point. 
> 
> Yes, questions are always allowed; however, their openness to debate is at
> the will of the body, not simply because the question was asked. 
> 
> I specifically chose not to respond to Mr. Ford's comments because of the
> value I placed in them and to respect Mr. Ford's opinions.  I do need to
> point out that just because the discussion is being had does not mean that
> it is appropriate for the business list. If this should come to a motion, so
> be it, but I do not wish to see an email fight in my inbox. As this matter
> is squarely in the purview of the APRC may I suggest a polite inquiry to Ms.
> Bilyeu in private, or at the very least hold the public discourse in Reno. I
> believe the issue will keep until then, because social media by its very
> nature is a "flavor of the day," and only grabs people at the surface level.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Francis Wendt
> LNC Region 1 Alternate
> 406.595.5111
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lnc-business <lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org> On Behalf Of Elizabeth
> Van Horn via Lnc-business
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 5:41 PM
> To: lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> Cc: Elizabeth Van Horn <elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org>
> Subject: [Lnc-business] Fwd: Re: Justin Amash Tweet Addendum to prior email
> 
> Forwarded to public list
> 
> -------- Original Message -------- 
> 
> SUBJECT:
> Re: [Lnc-business] Justin Amash Tweet Addendum to prior
> email
> 
> DATE:
> 2020-01-21 19:40
> 
> FROM:
> Elizabeth Van Horn <elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org>
> 
> TO:
> pat.ford at lp.org
> 
> What question?  Where you misinterpret an LP tweet?
> 
> Or the one where you add your own spin with words like "Lionization"? 
> (Which is nonsense)
> 
> Pat, you can ask questions. Whether they're important or not is open for
> debate.
> 
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
> LNC Region 3 Representative (IN, MI, OH, KY)