[Lnc-business] A/V Contract for the National Convention Executed

[Caryn Ann Harlos]

===the decision of the Convention Oversight Committee not to move forward
with an addendum for remote sites in other states, I===

that makes it seem as if the CoC is not planning for remote attendance, and
that is not accurate.  they certainly are.

*In Liberty,*

* Personal Note:  I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome
(part of the autism spectrum).  This can affect inter-personal
communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas.  If anyone
found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social faux
pas), please contact me privately and let me know. *



On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:30 PM john.phillips--- via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

> Mr Goldstein does this mean we can cancel your request for an emeeting? Or
> do you wish to continue with it?
>
> John Phillips
> Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
> Cell 217-412-5973
>
> On Jun 17, 2020 4:37 PM, "dustin.nanna--- via Lnc-business" <
> lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
> I thought maybe there was a last minute audible. I appreciate the quick
> response.
>
> On Jun 17, 2020 5:34 PM, Nicholas Sarwark via Lnc-business <
> lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
> We executed a contract with the company recommended by the Convention
> Oversight Committee after due diligence.
>
> -Nick
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 5:24 PM <dustin.nanna at lp.org> wrote:
>
> > As a point of clarification do you mean we are contracting with the in
> > house or with the other company?
> >
> > On Jun 17, 2020 5:19 PM, Nicholas Sarwark via Lnc-business <
> > lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > After the review of the bid from the in-house A/V provider from the
> Rosen
> > Shingle Creek, edits and approval from Special Counsel Oliver Hall, and
> > the
> > decision of the Convention Oversight Committee not to move forward with
> an
> > addendum for remote sites in other states, I approved the contract with
> > the
> > Audio Visual Group and directed Mr. Kraus to execute it on behalf of the
> > Libertarian National Committee.
> >
> > As a point of personal privilege, I didn't appreciate receiving over 100
> > emails sent to the business list over the weekend while I was visiting
> > Minneapolis to work in the community with the state chair and activists
> > from the Libertarian Party of Minnesota. Getting a message that my Gmail
> > storage was full while in the middle of a protest march and hours away
> > from
> > being back to a computer was particularly inconvenient. The same few
> > members of this committee have been exceedingly inconsiderate to their
> > fellow members in using a list intended for party business as their
> water
> > cooler and sending tens of messages on the same topic, rather than
> > collecting their thoughts into one or two emails. Perhaps this strategy
> of
> > flooding the list is persuasive to others, but it has not been
> persuasive
> > to me.
> >
> > Also, a LNC member of the Convention Oversight Committee apparently
> > thought
> > it was appropriate to share exact figures of two contracts to the public
> > list, something I find ironic, given that the same member has often been
> a
> > strong proponent of confidentiality of contracts and their details. In
> the
> > future, I would ask all members of the LNC to use good judgment in not
> > sharing confidential information publicly.
> >
> > As the days grow shorter between now and the second sitting of
> convention,
> > I would ask members of this committee to focus on the work of the
> > Libertarian Party rather than a flurry of emails and motions in the
> waning
> > weeks of the term, especially since there will be a new LNC in less than
> a
> > month.
> >
> > My flight and room are booked and I look forward to seeing those of you
> > who
> > will be attending in person in Orlando.
> >
> > Yours in liberty,
> > Nick
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>