[Lnc-business] CORRECTION Re: MOTION - Re: Truth in advertising on building fund (letter to donors)

Starchild sfdreamer at earthlink.net
Sat Jun 22 08:34:13 EDT 2013


	Excuse me, I meant the LNC Policy Manual, not the Bylaws.

                               ((( starchild )))

On Jun 22, 2013, at 5:32 AM, Starchild wrote:

> Geoff,
> 
> 	I just resent the motion, as revised, without any accompanying arguments. However even if your ruling is no longer material in this case, I do request you withdraw it for the record to avoid setting any incorrect precedent if it is not withdrawn or challenged, since I believe the ruling to be based on an incorrect reading of the bylaws as I described below.
> 
> Love & Liberty,
>                                ((( starchild )))
> At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
> 
> P.S. - Since this message is a request for a withdrawal of a ruling, I am posting it here in the belief that it falls under "business" to be discussed on the LNC-business list.
> 
> 
> On Jun 22, 2013, at 5:24 AM, Geoffrey Neale wrote:
> 
>> Starchild - I believe I am the Chair, and you are not, and I have given the
>> same kind of notice to others, although not necessarily on this list.
>> 
>> I suggest you take the effort to cut & paste the motion only portion, and
>> argue for it separately, unless you want to take the ten day effort to
>> challenge my ruling via another mail ballot.
>> 
>> Geoffrey Neale
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lnc-business [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org] On Behalf Of
>> Starchild
>> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 7:16 AM
>> To: lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> Subject: Re: [Lnc-business] MOTION - Re: Truth in advertising on building
>> fund (letter to donors)
>> 
>> Geoff,
>> 
>> 	I believe "electronic mail ballots" refers to just the official
>> email sent out by the secretary that gives notice a vote is underway, since
>> until a motion is sponsored by enough LNC members to be voted on, it is not
>> a "ballot".
>> 
>> Love & Liberty,
>>                                ((( starchild ))) At-Large Representative,
>> Libertarian National Committee
>> 
>> 
>> On Jun 22, 2013, at 5:03 AM, Geoffrey Neale wrote:
>> 
>>> Starchild:
>>> 
>>> Under my authority as Chair, I am ruling that your "motion" is out of
>> order.
>>> 
>>> LP Policy Manual states: "Electronic mail ballots shall not include an 
>>> accompanying argument for or against passage of the motion."
>>> 
>>> Geoffrey Neale
>>> Chair
>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Lnc-business [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org] On Behalf 
>>> Of Starchild
>>> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 5:50 AM
>>> To: lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> Subject: [Lnc-business] MOTION - Re: Truth in advertising on building 
>>> fund (letter to donors)
>>> 
>>> (NOTE: The automated email didn't accept this message the first time I 
>>> tried sending it, so rather than let it sit in an electronic cue I 
>>> cancelled the posting and have recopied it here. - Starchild)
>>> 
>>> *     *     *
>>> 
>>> From: Starchild <sfdreamer at earthlink.net>
>>> Date: June 22, 2013 3:31:00 AM PDT
>>> To: lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> Cc: LPSF Discussion List <lpsf-discuss at yahoogroups.com>, Grassroots 
>>> Libertarians Caucus <GrassrootsLibertarians at yahoogroups.com>, LP 
>>> Radical Caucus <lpradicals at yahoogroups.com>, calibs 
>>> <CALibs at yahoogroups.com>, San Diego LP Chat List 
>>> <sdlibchat at listserv.sdlp.org>, Jill Pyeatt <stone at altrionet.com>, 
>>> Krzysztof Lesiak <clesiak522 at gmail.com>, Libertarians for 9/11 Truth 
>>> <Libertariansfor911Truth at yahoogroups.com>, "Outright 
>>> Libertarian-Natl." <OutrightLibertarians at yahoogroups.com>, 
>>> Libertarians For Animal Rights 
>>> <libertarians_for_animal_rights at yahoogroups.com>,
>>> lpusmisc at yahoogroups.com
>>> Subject: [CALibs] MOTION - Re: Truth in advertising on building fund 
>>> (letter to donors)
>>> Reply-To: CALibs at yahoogroups.com
>>> 
>>> 	As I noted in a June 19 message to the Libertarian National 
>>> Committee's LNC-discuss list,
>>> 
>>>> . We promised donors to the project [to purchase a new LP national
>>> headquarters building] that their money would be spent to buy a 
>>> *building*, which would be named the "David F. Nolan Memorial 
>>> Building" -- not just office space in a building. I've seen nothing in 
>>> this proposal to indicate that we would even have naming rights to the 
>>> building as a whole...  we need to act with integrity and fulfill the 
>>> promises we make to people when we ask them to give us their money. 
>>> People are already calling this a "bait-and-switch", and they have a 
>>> valid point. If we go forward with this, it will undermine the confidence
>> of donors and supporters in the party.
>>> 
>>> 	Having seen no messages disagreeing with that assessment, I hope all
>> 
>>> of you will join me in supporting the following motion:
>>> 
>>> MOTION:
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> ~~~~~~ Whereas it is important that the Libertarian Party act with 
>>> integrity and fulfill any promises made in fundraising appeals to 
>>> donors concerning how their donations will be spent, and
>>> 
>>> Whereas donors have a right to expect this of the Libertarian Party 
>>> when making donations to the party, and
>>> 
>>> Whereas LP secretary David Blau as head of the building fund has 
>>> acknowledged the "mistake" of having been "a bit lax informing the 
>>> donors that we were investigating an office condo, rather than a full 
>>> building", and
>>> 
>>> Whereas fundraising appeals for the project to purchase a new LP 
>>> headquarters building repeatedly referred to purchasing a building, 
>>> rather than only purchasing space in a building, examples of which 
>>> language can be seen in the fundraising letter published at 
>>> http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2013/04/libertarian-party-pu
>>> t-your -name-on-the-david-nolan-memorial-building/;
>>> 
>>> Therefore if the Libertarian Party purchases the office space at 1101 
>>> King Street #160, in Alexandria, Virginia, which the Executive 
>>> Committee voted to authorize the Building Committee to enter into 
>>> negotiations concerning, or any other office space not comprising an 
>>> entire building, the committee in charge of the building fund shall 
>>> send all donors to this fund, by email or printed letter, a written 
>>> explanation and apology for using the funds to buy a part of a 
>>> building, rather than an entire building as was repeatedly described 
>>> in fundraising letters seeking donations for the project. This letter 
>>> shall ask each donor to send an email to LP secretary and building 
>>> fund point man David Blau (secretary at lp.org), stating the donor's 
>>> preference that his or her donation be (a) spent on office space in a 
>>> building purchased under the authorization of the LNC in lieu of 
>>> actually buying a building, (b) refunded, in which case a full refund 
>>> shall be issued to that donor as soon as reasonably possible, or (c) 
>>> put toward another Libertarian Party budget item of the donor's 
>>> choice, which should be specified in the donor's email to the 
>>> secretary; and inform them that if they have any further questions or 
>>> concerns about the project to purchase a new office or how their donation
>> is being handled they are welcome to contact one of their LNC
>> representatives (listed at http://www.lp.org/lnc-leadership).
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> ~~~~~~
>>> 
>>> 	I am seeking co-sponsors for this motion, and urge all my fellow 
>>> representatives and alternates on the Libertarian National Committee 
>>> to reply to this email as co-sponsors. Let us not dishonor David 
>>> Nolan's memory by giving even the appearance of raising under false 
>>> pretenses money to be used toward purchasing a space to be dedicated to
>> him.
>>> 
>>> Love & Liberty,
>>>                                ((( starchild ))) At-Large 
>>> Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>>> 
>>> 
>>> P.S. - If anyone not on the Libertarian National Committee receiving 
>>> this message has thoughts on this matter that you would like me to 
>>> share with the LNC, please let me know. I hope you will encourage them 
>>> to support this motion.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org





More information about the Lnc-business mailing list