[Lnc-business] UMP

[Joshua Katz]

No resistance from me.  I do like Dr. Lieberman's suggestion of possibly
discounting LPUS membership by $5 if the person decides to join both
simultaneously.

Connecticut would be happy to participate.

Joshua A. Katz
Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Scott L. <scott73 at earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
> I don't want to clutter the State Chairs list with our internal stuff...
>
>
>
>
>
> Mr. Chair - there are two courses of action:
>
>
>
>     1.  Implement what you suggest below immediately.  I bet staff could
> get this working with at least a few states well before the LNC Session in
> Phoenix next month.  If we do this, I suggest staff add a short
> explanation on the “Membership Center” page of what we are doing, and why
>    (ie – the FEC makes us do it this way).
>
>
>
>
>
>     2.  Ask our FEC consultant if states can collect money for National
> Memberships on *their *web sites, either as separate transactions, or
> maybe even as one transaction.  In the latter case, the state would send
> the money to National from their state bank account.  Isn't that legal even
> if a state is not FEC-filing?
>
>
>
> I suggest you wait until next Wednesday to make sure all LNC members have
> had a chance to read this thread.  If you don't get any significant
> objections, then please ask staff to implement what you wrote below, and
> hopefully get started on implementing number 2 above.
>
>
>
> TIA.
>
>
>   Scott Lieberman
>
>
>
>
>
> GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Statechairs [mailto:statechairs-bounces at hq.lp.org] On Behalf Of
> Nicholas Sarwark
> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 3:21 PM
> To: statechairs at hq.lp.org
> Subject: Re: [Statechairs] UMP
>
>
>
> If a joint checkout solution, i.e. Person A gives $X to LP Texas and
>
> $Y to the LNC from the same webpage, but in separate payment
>
> transactions, is legal under FEC rules and the relevant state
>
> campaign finance rules, I would direct that we implement it assuming
>
> the cost is reasonable, the effort is manageable with our staffing,
>
> and it doesn't derail other priorities.
>
>
>
> I don't foresee LNC resistance to my providing that direction to staff
>
> and/or request of the IT Committee.  If there is resistance to that
>
> from the LNC, I would work very hard to overcome that resistance.
>
>
>
> One of our jobs as a national committee is to be of value to our state
>
> affiliates.  I intend that we will do that job.
>
>
>
>      Nick
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20150206/e15b5383/attachment-0002.html>