[Lnc-business] Various items of interest

Thu Sep 22 00:39:11 EDT 2016

Thank you Nick.

-Caryn Ann

On Wednesday, September 21, 2016, Nicholas Sarwark <chair at lp.org> wrote:

> To respond to a specific question of Dr. Lark's question:
>
> "2)  I share many of the concerns that have expressed regarding the
> proposed contract between the LNC and the Johnson-Weld campaign.  I
> would appreciate it if Mr. Sarwark would indicate whether both parties
> have signed it.  (If the signing of the contract by both parties has
> been announced, I did not see the announcement.)"
>
> I had executed our copy on behalf of the LNC.  We have not, to my
> knowledge, received the countersigned copy from the campaign.  We are
> presently in discussions about a revised version of the agreement that
> addresses the concerns that have been raised.  I will update the LNC
> if/when either the campaign executes their copy of the original
> agreement or we execute a revised agreement.
>
> -Nick
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:13 PM, James Lark
> <jwl3s at eservices.virginia.edu <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > Dear colleagues:
> >
> >     I hope all is well with you.  I am writing to offer comments about
> > various items of interest.  I hope you find my comments worthy of your
> > attention.
> >
> > 1)  In a separate message I shall abstain on the motion regarding the
> > allocation of $5,000 from the "legal offense" budget line.  I believe the
> > LNC should help the Libertarian Party of Arizona concerning the ballot
> > access burden it faces; also, it is frequently appropriate to make an
> > explicit financial commitment before the funds are needed.  However,
> ceteris
> > paribus I would have preferred that we wait until more information
> regarding
> > the particulars of the situation (e.g., the expected cost of a legal
> > challenge) is available to us.
> >
> > 2)  I share many of the concerns that have expressed regarding the
> proposed
> > contract between the LNC and the Johnson-Weld campaign.  I would
> appreciate
> > it if Mr. Sarwark would indicate whether both parties have signed it.
> (If
> > the signing of the contract by both parties has been announced, I did not
> > see the announcement.)
> >
> >     As of this moment, I have not seen the contract; in particular, I
> have
> > not decided whether I should request the contract.  While I believe that
> > discretion and confidentiality are appropriate for certain aspects of our
> > activities, it is not clear to me that confidentiality-in-perpetuity is
> > appropriate for an agreement of this type.  If such a
> > confidentiality-in-perpetuity requirement is part of the agreement, such
> a
> > requirement raises questions about the ability of LNC members to uphold
> > their responsibilities to the LP membership.
> >
> >     Frankly, I am unsure as to the best way for the LNC to proceed in
> this
> > matter.  In any event, I believe there are aspects of this matter that we
> > should address at the December meeting, if not before.
> >
> > 3)  Allow me to offer some remarks about Mike Fellows.  I had the
> pleasure
> > of meeting him at a meeting of libertarians in Missoula, Montana in May
> > 1986.  The meeting was organized as part of an effort to build a local
> > Advocates for Self-Government "Seminar 1" group. (Over the course of
> roughly
> > two weeks I drove from Evanston, Illinois to Crooks, South Dakota via
> Omaha
> > (NE), Casper (WY), Boise (ID), Eugene (OR), Portland (OR), Vancouver
> (BC),
> > Seattle (WA), Tacoma (WA), and Missoula to help build such groups.)
> >
> >     Mike always impressed me as a fine gentleman: he was a man of
> > intelligence, wit, and generous spirit who represented the Libertarian
> Party
> > (and the liberty movement in general) very well. Moreover, I found him
> to be
> > a tireless worker for liberty and a great team player.  As far as I could
> > tell, he always put the interests of the Libertarian team ahead of any
> > parochial interests. Because of his team spirit and humility, I suspect
> many
> > people do not know of the substantial contributions he made to the LP.
> >
> >     I anticipate that within the next two days, I shall prepare a
> resolution
> > of appreciation for Mike.  I hope my words will express appropriately our
> > appreciation for his good works and friendship, and that you will find my
> > resolution to be worthy of your support.
> >
> >     As always, thank you for your work for liberty.  I look forward to
> > speaking with you soon.
> >
> >     Take care,
> >     Jim
> >
> >     James W. Lark, III
> >     Dept. of Systems and Information Engineering
> >     Applied Mathematics Program, Dept. of Engineering and Society
> >     Affiliated Faculty, Dept. of Statistics
> >     University of Virginia
> >
> >     Advisor, The Liberty Coalition
> >     University of Virginia
> >
> >     Region 5 Representative, Libertarian National Committee
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lnc-business mailing list
> > Lnc-business at hq.lp.org <javascript:;>
> > http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org <javascript:;>
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>

-- 
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
<http://www.lpcolorado.org>
Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
<http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20160921/c459613d/attachment-0002.html>