[Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2018-03: Censure of Arvin Vohra
erin.adams at lp.org
erin.adams at lp.org
Mon Jan 29 16:08:30 EST 2018
I dont get to vote on this but would have voted Yes. A motion to censure
should have been made some time ago imo
On 2018-01-29 15:04, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> So in short. Arvin acted horribly - will continue to act horribly and
> we have zero backbone to handle it. He breached his fiduciary duty
> HE
> COST OUR AFFILIATES DONORS, he insisted that our staff could rise to
> the occasion of raising that extra money and then broke their legs.
>
> My opinion.
>
> I don’t care if I’m the sole yes.
>
> I KNOW communicating radical ideas in a non-asshole way works. I do
> it
> every day. IT TAKES MORE COURAGE to do that than be an unempathic
> edgelord.
>
> And we bought it hook line and sinker.
>
> Literally shaking my head.
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:59 PM Caryn Ann Harlos
> <[1]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>
> I maintain my position as what the majority of my regional Chairs
> want.
>
> I hear the concerns about the wording and will communicate those to
> my
> state Chairs to see if that influences their decision.
>
> However the case in region 1 was cumulative and not just about this
> incidence and like it or not age of consent is an issue this Party
> has
> argued about since the beginning and I see politicking here in this
> body to deny that and makes this body the arbiter when the line is
> drawn and not the delegates.
>
> This it seems to me that this has become less about Arvin’s reckless
> behaviour and more and factional jockeying.
>
> It seems that yes this is a continuation of 2006 where people were
> assured that the platform was simply streamlined and not changed -
> so
> trying the change the meaning of adult here to be an arbitrary state
> law when IT NEVER MEANT THAT in the old platforms is showing a hand.
> IMHO.
>
> Which is a shame. Because Arvin’s behaviour was abominable but it’s
> obvious this Body can’t do a thing about it.
>
> I will report to my regional Chairs and act accordingly.
>
> The 2/2 meeting will be a farce because of the will here to have a
> Libertarian Purity test.
>
> Which I find so ironic.
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:19 PM Sam Goldstein
> <[2]sam.goldstein at lp.org>
> wrote:
>
> Please change my vote to "No" on this motion. I tend to agree
> with
> those who have pointed out that the wording of the censure seems
> to
> imply approval of ideas that are abhorrent to me and to the LP.
> ---
> Sam Goldstein
> Libertarian National Committee
> 317-850-0726 Cell
> On 2018-01-29 14:26, Alicia Mattson wrote:
> > I have to vote no.
> > As I wrote previously, censure (and more) is warranted here,
> > however, I
> > cannot vote for a motion which claims the outrageous comments
> which
> > were made by Mr. Vohra are "libertarian ideas", and that our
> leaders
> > and candidates are trying to win hearts and minds for those
> ideas
> > espoused by Mr. Vohra, just stated in a different way.
> > -Alicia
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Alicia Mattson
> > <[1][3]agmattson at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > We have an electronic mail ballot.
> > Votes are due to the LNC-Business list by January 30, 2018 at
> > 11:59:59pm Pacific time.
> >
> > Co-Sponsors: Hayes, Hewitt, Demarest, Hagan
> > Motion: to censure LNC Vice Chair Arvin Vohra for repeated
> public
> > comments which have presented libertarian ideas in an
> inflammatory
> > and
> > sometimes offensive manner not conducive to Libertarian
> leaders
> and
> > candidates for public office winning hearts and minds for
> those
> > ideas.
> > -Alicia
> >
> > References
> >
> > 1. mailto:[4]agmattson at gmail.com
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 2. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
> 3. mailto:agmattson at gmail.com
> 4. mailto:agmattson at gmail.com
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list