[Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2018-03: Censure of Arvin Vohra
Starchild
starchild at lp.org
Wed Jan 31 03:06:40 EST 2018
After some difficult deliberation, I vote no on this motion. No one has yet been able to identify anything the vice-chair said that is clearly un-libertarian, and while I continue to think that some of his outreach efforts have shown poor judgement, and have obviously upset many people, I cannot endorse the misguided set of priorities that would be implicitly endorsed by censuring someone in a case like this while failing to censure other Libertarian leaders such as William Weld last year who have said clearly un-libertarian things from a much more visible platform.
Love & Liberty,
((( starchild )))
At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
RealReform at earthlink.net
(415) 625-FREE
On Jan 31, 2018, at 12:01 AM, Starchild wrote:
>
> A statement describing a group of people as "fair game" sounds like describing them as animals to be hunted, rather than individual human beings with rights. I would reject that characterization.
>
> "Pervert" is a loaded term commonly applied to demonize anyone whose sexual habits are not considered acceptable. It has been applied to LGBTQ people and others, and I don't think it is appropriate in what should be a rational discussion about human development and the capacity to consent. I haven't heard that Arvin ever used the term (hopefully not).
>
> In the case of Roy Moore, he has been credibly accused of sexual assault (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Moore_sexual_misconduct_allegations, in particular the case of Beverly Young Nelson). He is also an authoritarian-leaning politician who wants to force his morality on others at the point of government guns. I don't think we owe him an apology.
>
> Love & Liberty,
>
> ((( starchild )))
> At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
> RealReform at earthlink.net
> (415) 625-FREE
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2018, at 10:12 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>
>> And again if 14 year old girls are typically fair game- I ask again -
>> does anyone defending that statement here have the fortitude to move a
>> resolution to apologize to Roy Moore?
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:10 PM Caryn Ann Harlos
>> <[1]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>>
>> I am using words the way people heard them and that was the implication
>> of what he said. He would rather even someone he thinks is a pervert
>> (they do exist - and they do troll after kids) as long as they have a
>> job to impregnate a 14 year old than another kid. Because welfare.
>>
>> Yes - when put in the stark cold reality of the implications of what he
>> said it IS awful. And that’s what our members heard. Many of them
>> just as “pure” as Arvin.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:29 PM Starchild <[2]starchild at lp.org> wrote:
>>
>> Caryn Ann,
>> Mary Ruwart's comment is clearly weighing in on our debate
>> on this motion, and her stance seems plain enough. It's hard to
>> imagine she'd object to us seeing her remarks in a timely manner, so
>> accusing Arvin of "using people" by publishing them here seems
>> uncalled for. As does the use of demonizing epithets like "pervert".
>> I frankly find that language offensive, and hope we can keep the
>> discussion more civil.
>> Love & Liberty,
>> ((( starchild )))
>> At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>> [3]RealReform at earthlink.net
>> (415) 625-FREE
>> On Jan 30, 2018, at 8:52 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>>> And of course that was not the point.
>>> I would love to speak with Dr. Ruwart on this, the author of
>> "The
>>> Compassion of Libertarianism" about how we need less empathy and
>> ya
>>> know, if a 14 year old gets pregnant, might as well be a pervert
>> with a
>>> job rather than a broke kid. Because welfare.
>>> This is called using people.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:56 PM, Arvin Vohra
>> <[1][4]votevohra at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Forward from Dr. Mary Ruwart:
>>> “If such motions had circulated in the LNC in the early
>> days of
>>> our
>>> Party, no LNC member would have spoken out against the War
>> on
>>> Drugs,
>>> claimed that gays had rights, or pointed out that taxation
>> was
>>> theft.
>>> All of these positions were considered inflammatory and
>> offensive
>>> to
>>> the majority of people outside the LP for most of the
>> 1980s,
>>> regardless
>>> of how carefully these positions were presented. Now, they
>> are
>>> seriously embraced or considered across the political
>> spectrum
>>> precisely because we spoke out. It’s impossible to affect
>> serious
>>> change without offending some listeners. How can anyone
>> believe
>>> that
>>> the LP supports free speech when its own members are
>> punished for
>>> engaging in it?” ----Mary J. Ruwart
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:45 AM,
>> <[1][2][5]david.demarest at lp.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> I change my vote to "YES" on the censure motion and ask
>> others to
>>> vote 'YES' and request the cancellation of the electronic
>> meeting
>>> to
>>> consider suspension.
>>> Arvin has audaciously and courageously challenged us to
>> stop
>>> speaking in tongues about our Libertarian principles. He
>> has
>>> correctly identified the fact that the opposition does a
>> better
>>> job
>>> of describing our policy and positions than we do. We need
>> to step
>>> up to the plate with equal courage and get us back on track
>> toward
>>> our shared goal of freedom.
>>> It is time to end this game of Russian roulette that Ms.
>> Mattson
>>> has
>>> aptly described as a circular firing squad, this
>>> political-correctness nightmare of timidity before voters
>> and
>>> pandemic get-elected-itis at the expense of not only our
>>> principles
>>> but any semblance of rationality. We have done enough
>> damage to
>>> the
>>> Libertarian cause. Let us cease this endless cycle of
>>> self-destruction before we plunge ourselves into a
>> death-spiral of
>>> reworded censure motions.
>>> Good grief - enough already!
>>> ~David Pratt Demarest
>>> On 2018-01-29 22:11, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>>> I hope my statement that the censure will fail is
>> disproven. I am
>>> disappointed in the yes votes changing to no. This
>> censure is
>>> woefully
>>> inadequate, but it is not as woefully inadequate as
>> nothing at
>>> all.
>>> What we heard from Arvin is a defense of Trump tactics.
>> That
>>> is
>>> not
>>> the LP I work for, recruit for, and donate for.
>>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:00 PM, Patrick McKnight
>>>
>>> <[1][2][3][6]patrick.mcknight at lp.org> wrote:
>>> I vote yes. However I feel censure is
>> insufficient and
>>> look
>>> forward to
>>> the electronic meeting.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Patrick McKnight
>>> Region 8 Rep
>>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:21 PM, Tim Hagan
>>> <[1][2][3][4][7]tim.hagan at lp.org>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>> I vote yes.
>>> ---
>>> Tim Hagan
>>> Treasurer, Libertarian National Committee
>>> On 2018-01-20 19:03, Alicia Mattson wrote:
>>> We have an electronic mail ballot.
>>> Votes are due to the LNC-Business list by
>> January 30,
>>> 2018 at
>>> 11:59:59pm Pacific time.
>>> Co-Sponsors: Hayes, Hewitt, Demarest, Hagan
>>> Motion: to censure LNC Vice Chair Arvin Vohra
>> for
>>> repeated
>>> public
>>> comments which have presented libertarian ideas
>> in an
>>> inflammatory
>>> and
>>> sometimes offensive manner not conducive to
>> Libertarian
>>> leaders and
>>> candidates for public office winning hearts and
>> minds
>>> for
>>> those
>>> ideas.
>>> -Alicia
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>
>>> [2][3][4][5][8]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> [3][4][5][6][9]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
>>> /mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>> References
>>> 1. mailto:[5][6][7][10]tim.hagan at lp.org
>>> 2. mailto:[6][7][8][11]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> 3. [7][8][9][12]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
>>> ilman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>> References
>>> 1. mailto:[9][10][13]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>>> 2. mailto:[10][11][14]tim.hagan at lp.org
>>> 3. mailto:[11][12][15]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> 4. [12][13][16]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
>>> mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>> 5. mailto:[13][14][17]tim.hagan at lp.org
>>> 6. mailto:[14][15][18]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> 7. [15][16][19]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
>>> mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>> --
>>> Arvin Vohra
>>> [16][17][20]www.VoteVohra.com
>>> [17][18][21]VoteVohra at gmail.com
>>> [19](301) 320-3634
>>> References
>>> 1. mailto:[20][22]david.demarest at lp.org
>>> 2. mailto:[21][23]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>>> 3. mailto:[22][24]tim.hagan at lp.org
>>> 4. mailto:[23][25]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> 5.
>> [24][26]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>> 6. mailto:[25][27]tim.hagan at lp.org
>>> 7. mailto:[26][28]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> 8.
>> [27][29]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>> 9. mailto:[28][30]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>>> 10. mailto:[29][31]tim.hagan at lp.org
>>> 11. mailto:[30][32]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> 12.
>> [31][33]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>> 13. mailto:[32][34]tim.hagan at lp.org
>>> 14. mailto:[33][35]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> 15.
>> [34][36]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>> 16. [35][37]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>>> 17. mailto:[36][38]VoteVohra at gmail.com
>>>
>>> References
>>>
>>> 1. mailto:[39]votevohra at gmail.com
>>> 2. mailto:[40]david.demarest at lp.org
>>> 3. mailto:[41]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>>> 4. mailto:[42]tim.hagan at lp.org
>>> 5. mailto:[43]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> 6. [44]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
>>> 7. mailto:[45]tim.hagan at lp.org
>>> 8. mailto:[46]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> 9. [47]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
>>> 10. mailto:[48]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>>> 11. mailto:[49]tim.hagan at lp.org
>>> 12. mailto:[50]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> 13. [51]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>> 14. mailto:[52]tim.hagan at lp.org
>>> 15. mailto:[53]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> 16. [54]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>> 17. [55]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>>> 18. mailto:[56]VoteVohra at gmail.com
>>> 19. tel:(301) 320-3634
>>> 20. mailto:[57]david.demarest at lp.org
>>> 21. mailto:[58]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>>> 22. mailto:[59]tim.hagan at lp.org
>>> 23. mailto:[60]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> 24. [61]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>> 25. mailto:[62]tim.hagan at lp.org
>>> 26. mailto:[63]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> 27. [64]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>> 28. mailto:[65]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>>> 29. mailto:[66]tim.hagan at lp.org
>>> 30. mailto:[67]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> 31. [68]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>> 32. mailto:[69]tim.hagan at lp.org
>>> 33. mailto:[70]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> 34. [71]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>> 35. [72]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>>> 36. mailto:[73]VoteVohra at gmail.com
>>
>> References
>>
>> 1. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>> 2. mailto:starchild at lp.org
>> 3. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
>> 4. mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
>> 5. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
>> 6. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>> 7. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>> 8. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 9. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
>> 10. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>> 11. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 12. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
>> 13. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>> 14. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>> 15. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 16. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
>> 17. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>> 18. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 19. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
>> 20. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>> 21. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
>> 22. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
>> 23. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>> 24. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>> 25. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 26. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>> 27. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>> 28. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 29. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>> 30. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>> 31. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>> 32. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 33. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>> 34. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>> 35. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 36. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>> 37. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>> 38. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
>> 39. mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
>> 40. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
>> 41. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>> 42. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>> 43. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 44. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
>> 45. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>> 46. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 47. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
>> 48. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>> 49. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>> 50. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 51. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>> 52. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>> 53. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 54. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>> 55. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>> 56. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
>> 57. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
>> 58. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>> 59. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>> 60. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 61. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>> 62. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>> 63. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 64. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>> 65. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>> 66. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>> 67. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 68. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>> 69. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>> 70. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 71. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>> 72. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>> 73. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
After some difficult deliberation, I vote no on this motion. No one
has yet been able to identify anything the vice-chair said that is
clearly un-libertarian, and while I continue to think that some of his
outreach efforts have shown poor judgement, and have obviously upset
many people, I cannot endorse the misguided set of priorities that
would be implicitly endorsed by censuring someone in a case like this
while failing to censure other Libertarian leaders such as William Weld
last year who have said clearly un-libertarian things from a much more
visible platform.
Love & Liberty,
((( starchild )))
At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
[1]RealReform at earthlink.net
(415) 625-FREE
On Jan 31, 2018, at 12:01 AM, Starchild wrote:
A statement describing a group of people as "fair game" sounds like
describing them as animals to be hunted, rather than individual human
beings with rights. I would reject that characterization.
"Pervert" is a loaded term commonly applied to demonize anyone whose
sexual habits are not considered acceptable. It has been applied to
LGBTQ people and others, and I don't think it is appropriate in what
should be a rational discussion about human development and the
capacity to consent. I haven't heard that Arvin ever used the term
(hopefully not).
In the case of Roy Moore, he has been credibly accused of sexual
assault (see
[2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Moore_sexual_misconduct_allegation
s, in particular the case of Beverly Young Nelson). He is also an
authoritarian-leaning politician who wants to force his morality on
others at the point of government guns. I don't think we owe him an
apology.
Love & Liberty,
((( starchild )))
At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
[3]RealReform at earthlink.net
(415) 625-FREE
On Jan 30, 2018, at 10:12 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
And again if 14 year old girls are typically fair game- I ask again
-
does anyone defending that statement here have the fortitude to
move a
resolution to apologize to Roy Moore?
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:10 PM Caryn Ann Harlos
<[1]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
I am using words the way people heard them and that was the
implication
of what he said. He would rather even someone he thinks is a
pervert
(they do exist - and they do troll after kids) as long as they
have a
job to impregnate a 14 year old than another kid. Because welfare.
Yes - when put in the stark cold reality of the implications of
what he
said it IS awful. And that�s what our members heard. Many of them
just as �pure� as Arvin.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:29 PM Starchild <[2]starchild at lp.org>
wrote:
Caryn Ann,
Mary Ruwart's comment is clearly weighing in on our
debate
on this motion, and her stance seems plain enough. It's hard to
imagine she'd object to us seeing her remarks in a timely manner,
so
accusing Arvin of "using people" by publishing them here seems
uncalled for. As does the use of demonizing epithets like
"pervert".
I frankly find that language offensive, and hope we can keep the
discussion more civil.
Love & Liberty,
((( starchild )))
At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
[3]RealReform at earthlink.net
(415) 625-FREE
On Jan 30, 2018, at 8:52 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
And of course that was not the point.
I would love to speak with Dr. Ruwart on this, the author of
"The
Compassion of Libertarianism" about how we need less empathy and
ya
know, if a 14 year old gets pregnant, might as well be a pervert
with a
job rather than a broke kid. Because welfare.
This is called using people.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:56 PM, Arvin Vohra
<[1][4]votevohra at gmail.com>
wrote:
Forward from Dr. Mary Ruwart:
�If such motions had circulated in the LNC in the early
days of
our
Party, no LNC member would have spoken out against the War
on
Drugs,
claimed that gays had rights, or pointed out that taxation
was
theft.
All of these positions were considered inflammatory and
offensive
to
the majority of people outside the LP for most of the
1980s,
regardless
of how carefully these positions were presented. Now, they
are
seriously embraced or considered across the political
spectrum
precisely because we spoke out. It�s impossible to affect
serious
change without offending some listeners. How can anyone
believe
that
the LP supports free speech when its own members are
punished for
engaging in it?� ----Mary J. Ruwart
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:45 AM,
<[1][2][5]david.demarest at lp.org>
wrote:
I change my vote to "YES" on the censure motion and ask
others to
vote 'YES' and request the cancellation of the electronic
meeting
to
consider suspension.
Arvin has audaciously and courageously challenged us to
stop
speaking in tongues about our Libertarian principles. He
has
correctly identified the fact that the opposition does a
better
job
of describing our policy and positions than we do. We need
to step
up to the plate with equal courage and get us back on track
toward
our shared goal of freedom.
It is time to end this game of Russian roulette that Ms.
Mattson
has
aptly described as a circular firing squad, this
political-correctness nightmare of timidity before voters
and
pandemic get-elected-itis at the expense of not only our
principles
but any semblance of rationality. We have done enough
damage to
the
Libertarian cause. Let us cease this endless cycle of
self-destruction before we plunge ourselves into a
death-spiral of
reworded censure motions.
Good grief - enough already!
~David Pratt Demarest
On 2018-01-29 22:11, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
I hope my statement that the censure will fail is
disproven. I am
disappointed in the yes votes changing to no. This
censure is
woefully
inadequate, but it is not as woefully inadequate as
nothing at
all.
What we heard from Arvin is a defense of Trump tactics.
That
is
not
the LP I work for, recruit for, and donate for.
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:00 PM, Patrick McKnight
<[1][2][3][6]patrick.mcknight at lp.org> wrote:
I vote yes. However I feel censure is
insufficient and
look
forward to
the electronic meeting.
Thanks,
Patrick McKnight
Region 8 Rep
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:21 PM, Tim Hagan
<[1][2][3][4][7]tim.hagan at lp.org>
wrote:
I vote yes.
---
Tim Hagan
Treasurer, Libertarian National Committee
On 2018-01-20 19:03, Alicia Mattson wrote:
We have an electronic mail ballot.
Votes are due to the LNC-Business list by
January 30,
2018 at
11:59:59pm Pacific time.
Co-Sponsors: Hayes, Hewitt, Demarest, Hagan
Motion: to censure LNC Vice Chair Arvin Vohra
for
repeated
public
comments which have presented libertarian ideas
in an
inflammatory
and
sometimes offensive manner not conducive to
Libertarian
leaders and
candidates for public office winning hearts and
minds
for
those
ideas.
-Alicia
_______________________________________________
Lnc-business mailing list
[2][3][4][5][8]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
[3][4][5][6][9]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
References
1. mailto:[5][6][7][10]tim.hagan at lp.org
2. mailto:[6][7][8][11]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
3. [7][8][9][12]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
ilman/listinfo/lnc-business
References
1. mailto:[9][10][13]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
2. mailto:[10][11][14]tim.hagan at lp.org
3. mailto:[11][12][15]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
4. [12][13][16]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
5. mailto:[13][14][17]tim.hagan at lp.org
6. mailto:[14][15][18]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
7. [15][16][19]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
--
Arvin Vohra
[16][17][20]www.VoteVohra.com
[17][18][21]VoteVohra at gmail.com
[19](301) 320-3634
References
1. mailto:[20][22]david.demarest at lp.org
2. mailto:[21][23]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
3. mailto:[22][24]tim.hagan at lp.org
4. mailto:[23][25]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
5.
[24][26]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
6. mailto:[25][27]tim.hagan at lp.org
7. mailto:[26][28]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
8.
[27][29]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
9. mailto:[28][30]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
10. mailto:[29][31]tim.hagan at lp.org
11. mailto:[30][32]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
12.
[31][33]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
13. mailto:[32][34]tim.hagan at lp.org
14. mailto:[33][35]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
15.
[34][36]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
16. [35][37]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
17. mailto:[36][38]VoteVohra at gmail.com
References
1. mailto:[39]votevohra at gmail.com
2. mailto:[40]david.demarest at lp.org
3. mailto:[41]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
4. mailto:[42]tim.hagan at lp.org
5. mailto:[43]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
6. [44]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
7. mailto:[45]tim.hagan at lp.org
8. mailto:[46]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
9. [47]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
10. mailto:[48]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
11. mailto:[49]tim.hagan at lp.org
12. mailto:[50]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
13. [51]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
14. mailto:[52]tim.hagan at lp.org
15. mailto:[53]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
16. [54]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
17. [55]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
18. mailto:[56]VoteVohra at gmail.com
19. tel:(301) 320-3634
20. mailto:[57]david.demarest at lp.org
21. mailto:[58]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
22. mailto:[59]tim.hagan at lp.org
23. mailto:[60]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
24. [61]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
25. mailto:[62]tim.hagan at lp.org
26. mailto:[63]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
27. [64]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
28. mailto:[65]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
29. mailto:[66]tim.hagan at lp.org
30. mailto:[67]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
31. [68]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
32. mailto:[69]tim.hagan at lp.org
33. mailto:[70]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
34. [71]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
35. [72]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
36. mailto:[73]VoteVohra at gmail.com
References
1. [4]mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
2. [5]mailto:starchild at lp.org
3. [6]mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
4. [7]mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
5. [8]mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
6. [9]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
7. [10]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
8. [11]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
9. [12]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
10. [13]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
11. [14]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
12. [15]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
13. [16]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
14. [17]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
15. [18]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
16. [19]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
17. [20]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
18. [21]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
19. [22]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
20. [23]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
21. [24]mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
22. [25]mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
23. [26]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
24. [27]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
25. [28]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
26. [29]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
27. [30]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
28. [31]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
29. [32]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
30. [33]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
31. [34]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
32. [35]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
33. [36]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
34. [37]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
35. [38]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
36. [39]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
37. [40]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
38. [41]mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
39. [42]mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
40. [43]mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
41. [44]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
42. [45]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
43. [46]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
44. [47]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
45. [48]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
46. [49]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
47. [50]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
48. [51]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
49. [52]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
50. [53]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
51. [54]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
52. [55]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
53. [56]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
54. [57]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
55. [58]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
56. [59]mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
57. [60]mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
58. [61]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
59. [62]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
60. [63]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
61. [64]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
62. [65]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
63. [66]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
64. [67]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
65. [68]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
66. [69]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
67. [70]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
68. [71]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
69. [72]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
70. [73]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
71. [74]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
72. [75]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
73. [76]mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
References
1. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Moore_sexual_misconduct_allegations
3. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
4. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
5. mailto:starchild at lp.org
6. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
7. mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
8. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
9. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
10. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
11. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
12. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
13. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
14. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
15. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
16. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
17. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
18. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
19. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
20. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
21. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
22. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
23. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
24. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
25. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
26. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
27. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
28. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
29. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
30. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
31. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
32. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
33. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
34. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
35. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
36. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
37. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
38. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
39. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
40. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
41. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
42. mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
43. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
44. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
45. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
46. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
47. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
48. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
49. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
50. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
51. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
52. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
53. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
54. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
55. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
56. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
57. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
58. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
59. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
60. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
61. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
62. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
63. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
64. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
65. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
66. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
67. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
68. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
69. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
70. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
71. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
72. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
73. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
74. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
75. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
76. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list