[Lnc-business] P.S. - Re: Email Ballot 2018-03: Censure of Arvin Vohra

Starchild starchild at lp.org
Wed Jan 31 03:11:03 EST 2018


P.S. – Please note the message was sent before the midnight Pacific Time voting deadline; the time stamp on my email software is incorrect.

Love & Liberty,

                                     ((( starchild )))
  At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
                           RealReform at earthlink.net
                                   (415) 625-FREE


On Jan 31, 2018, at 12:06 AM, Starchild wrote:

>    After some difficult deliberation, I vote no on this motion. No one
>   has yet been able to identify anything the vice-chair said that is
>   clearly un-libertarian, and while I continue to think that some of his
>   outreach efforts have shown poor judgement, and have obviously upset
>   many people, I cannot endorse the misguided set of priorities that
>   would be implicitly endorsed by censuring someone in a case like this
>   while failing to censure other Libertarian leaders such as William Weld
>   last year who have said clearly un-libertarian things from a much more
>   visible platform.
> 
>   Love & Liberty,
>                                      ((( starchild )))
>   At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>                            [1]RealReform at earthlink.net
>                                    (415) 625-FREE
> 
> 
>   On Jan 31, 2018, at 12:01 AM, Starchild wrote:
> 
>   A statement describing a group of people as "fair game" sounds like
>   describing them as animals to be hunted, rather than individual human
>   beings with rights. I would reject that characterization.
>   "Pervert" is a loaded term commonly applied to demonize anyone whose
>   sexual habits are not considered acceptable. It has been applied to
>   LGBTQ people and others, and I don't think it is appropriate in what
>   should be a rational discussion about human development and the
>   capacity to consent. I haven't heard that Arvin ever used the term
>   (hopefully not).
>   In the case of Roy Moore, he has been credibly accused of sexual
>   assault (see
>   [2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Moore_sexual_misconduct_allegation
>   s, in particular the case of Beverly Young Nelson). He is also an
>   authoritarian-leaning politician who wants to force his morality on
>   others at the point of government guns. I don't think we owe him an
>   apology.
>   Love & Liberty,
>                                      ((( starchild )))
>   At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>                            [3]RealReform at earthlink.net
>                                    (415) 625-FREE
> 
> 
>   On Jan 30, 2018, at 10:12 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> 
>      And again if 14 year old girls are typically fair game- I ask again
>     -
> 
>      does anyone defending that statement here have the fortitude to
>     move a
> 
>      resolution to apologize to Roy Moore?
> 
>      On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:10 PM Caryn Ann Harlos
> 
>      <[1]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
> 
>      I am using words the way people heard them and that was the
>     implication
> 
>      of what he said.  He would rather even someone he thinks is a
>     pervert
> 
>      (they do exist  - and they do troll after kids) as long as they
>     have a
> 
>      job to impregnate a 14 year old than another kid.  Because welfare.
> 
>      Yes - when put in the stark cold reality of the implications of
>     what he
> 
>      said it IS awful.  And that�s what our members heard.  Many of them
> 
>      just as �pure� as Arvin.
> 
>      On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:29 PM Starchild <[2]starchild at lp.org>
>     wrote:
> 
>        Caryn Ann,
> 
>                Mary Ruwart's comment is clearly weighing in on our
>     debate
> 
>        on this motion, and her stance seems plain enough. It's hard to
> 
>        imagine she'd object to us seeing her remarks in a timely manner,
>     so
> 
>        accusing Arvin of "using people" by publishing them here seems
> 
>        uncalled for. As does the use of demonizing epithets like
>     "pervert".
> 
>        I frankly find that language offensive, and hope we can keep the
> 
>        discussion more civil.
> 
>        Love & Liberty,
> 
>                                           ((( starchild )))
> 
>        At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
> 
>                                 [3]RealReform at earthlink.net
> 
>                                        (415) 625-FREE
> 
>        On Jan 30, 2018, at 8:52 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> 
>     And of course that was not the point.
> 
>     I would love to speak with Dr. Ruwart on this, the author of
> 
>        "The
> 
>     Compassion of Libertarianism" about how we need less empathy and
> 
>        ya
> 
>     know, if a 14 year old gets pregnant, might as well be a pervert
> 
>        with a
> 
>     job rather than a broke kid.  Because welfare.
> 
>     This is called using people.
> 
>     On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:56 PM, Arvin Vohra
> 
>        <[1][4]votevohra at gmail.com>
> 
>     wrote:
> 
>          Forward from Dr. Mary Ruwart:
> 
>          �If such motions had circulated in the LNC in the early
> 
>        days of
> 
>       our
> 
>          Party, no LNC member would have spoken out against the War
> 
>        on
> 
>       Drugs,
> 
>          claimed that gays had rights, or pointed out that taxation
> 
>        was
> 
>       theft.
> 
>          All of these positions were considered inflammatory and
> 
>        offensive
> 
>       to
> 
>          the majority of people outside the LP for most of the
> 
>        1980s,
> 
>       regardless
> 
>          of how carefully these positions were presented. Now, they
> 
>        are
> 
>          seriously embraced or considered across the political
> 
>        spectrum
> 
>          precisely because we spoke out. It�s impossible to affect
> 
>        serious
> 
>          change without offending some listeners. How can anyone
> 
>        believe
> 
>       that
> 
>          the LP supports free speech when its own members are
> 
>        punished for
> 
>          engaging in it?�  ----Mary J. Ruwart
> 
>        On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:45 AM,
> 
>        <[1][2][5]david.demarest at lp.org>
> 
>     wrote:
> 
>          I change my vote to "YES" on the censure motion and ask
> 
>        others to
> 
>          vote 'YES' and request the cancellation of the electronic
> 
>        meeting
> 
>     to
> 
>          consider suspension.
> 
>          Arvin has audaciously and courageously challenged us to
> 
>        stop
> 
>          speaking in tongues about our Libertarian principles. He
> 
>        has
> 
>          correctly identified the fact that the opposition does a
> 
>        better
> 
>     job
> 
>          of describing our policy and positions than we do. We need
> 
>        to step
> 
>          up to the plate with equal courage and get us back on track
> 
>        toward
> 
>          our shared goal of freedom.
> 
>          It is time to end this game of Russian roulette that Ms.
> 
>        Mattson
> 
>     has
> 
>          aptly described as a circular firing squad, this
> 
>          political-correctness nightmare of timidity before voters
> 
>        and
> 
>          pandemic get-elected-itis at the expense of not only our
> 
>     principles
> 
>          but any semblance of rationality. We have done enough
> 
>        damage to
> 
>     the
> 
>          Libertarian cause. Let us cease this endless cycle of
> 
>          self-destruction before we plunge ourselves into a
> 
>        death-spiral of
> 
>          reworded censure motions.
> 
>          Good grief - enough already!
> 
>          ~David Pratt Demarest
> 
>        On 2018-01-29 22:11, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> 
>          I hope my statement that the censure will fail is
> 
>        disproven.  I am
> 
>             disappointed in the yes votes changing to no.  This
> 
>        censure is
> 
>          woefully
> 
>             inadequate, but it is not as woefully inadequate as
> 
>        nothing at
> 
>          all.
> 
>             What we heard from Arvin is a defense of Trump tactics.
> 
>        That
> 
>     is
> 
>          not
> 
>             the LP I work for, recruit for, and donate for.
> 
>             On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:00 PM, Patrick McKnight
> 
>               <[1][2][3][6]patrick.mcknight at lp.org> wrote:
> 
>                    I vote yes. However I feel censure is
> 
>        insufficient and
> 
>       look
> 
>                 forward to
> 
>                    the electronic meeting.
> 
>                    Thanks,
> 
>                    Patrick McKnight
> 
>                    Region 8 Rep
> 
>                    On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:21 PM, Tim Hagan
> 
>                 <[1][2][3][4][7]tim.hagan at lp.org>
> 
>                  wrote:
> 
>                    I vote yes.
> 
>                    ---
> 
>                    Tim Hagan
> 
>                    Treasurer, Libertarian National Committee
> 
>                  On 2018-01-20 19:03, Alicia Mattson wrote:
> 
>                  We have an electronic mail ballot.
> 
>                     Votes are due to the LNC-Business list by
> 
>        January 30,
> 
>          2018 at
> 
>                     11:59:59pm Pacific time.
> 
>                     Co-Sponsors:  Hayes, Hewitt, Demarest, Hagan
> 
>                     Motion:  to censure LNC Vice Chair Arvin Vohra
> 
>        for
> 
>          repeated
> 
>               public
> 
>                     comments which have presented libertarian ideas
> 
>        in an
> 
>               inflammatory
> 
>                  and
> 
>                     sometimes offensive manner not conducive to
> 
>        Libertarian
> 
>               leaders and
> 
>                     candidates for public office winning hearts and
> 
>        minds
> 
>     for
> 
>               those
> 
>                  ideas.
> 
>                     -Alicia
> 
>                    _______________________________________________
> 
>                    Lnc-business mailing list
> 
>                      [2][3][4][5][8]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>                      [3][4][5][6][9]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
> 
>            /mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>                 References
> 
>                    1. mailto:[5][6][7][10]tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>                  2. mailto:[6][7][8][11]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>                  3. [7][8][9][12]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
> 
>            ilman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>            References
> 
>               1. mailto:[9][10][13]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
> 
>               2. mailto:[10][11][14]tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>               3. mailto:[11][12][15]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>               4. [12][13][16]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
> 
>       mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>               5. mailto:[13][14][17]tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>               6. mailto:[14][15][18]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>               7. [15][16][19]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
> 
>       mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>          --
> 
>          Arvin Vohra
> 
>          [16][17][20]www.VoteVohra.com
> 
>          [17][18][21]VoteVohra at gmail.com
> 
>          [19](301) 320-3634
> 
>       References
> 
>          1. mailto:[20][22]david.demarest at lp.org
> 
>          2. mailto:[21][23]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
> 
>          3. mailto:[22][24]tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>          4. mailto:[23][25]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>          5.
> 
>        [24][26]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>          6. mailto:[25][27]tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>          7. mailto:[26][28]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>          8.
> 
>        [27][29]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>          9. mailto:[28][30]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
> 
>         10. mailto:[29][31]tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>         11. mailto:[30][32]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>         12.
> 
>        [31][33]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>         13. mailto:[32][34]tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>         14. mailto:[33][35]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>         15.
> 
>        [34][36]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>         16. [35][37]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
> 
>         17. mailto:[36][38]VoteVohra at gmail.com
> 
>     References
> 
>     1. mailto:[39]votevohra at gmail.com
> 
>     2. mailto:[40]david.demarest at lp.org
> 
>     3. mailto:[41]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
> 
>     4. mailto:[42]tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     5. mailto:[43]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     6. [44]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
> 
>     7. mailto:[45]tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     8. mailto:[46]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     9. [47]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
> 
>     10. mailto:[48]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
> 
>     11. mailto:[49]tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     12. mailto:[50]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     13. [51]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>     14. mailto:[52]tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     15. mailto:[53]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     16. [54]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>     17. [55]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
> 
>     18. mailto:[56]VoteVohra at gmail.com
> 
>     19. tel:(301) 320-3634
> 
>     20. mailto:[57]david.demarest at lp.org
> 
>     21. mailto:[58]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
> 
>     22. mailto:[59]tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     23. mailto:[60]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     24. [61]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>     25. mailto:[62]tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     26. mailto:[63]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     27. [64]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>     28. mailto:[65]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
> 
>     29. mailto:[66]tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     30. mailto:[67]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     31. [68]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>     32. mailto:[69]tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     33. mailto:[70]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     34. [71]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>     35. [72]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
> 
>     36. mailto:[73]VoteVohra at gmail.com
> 
>     References
> 
>      1. [4]mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 
>      2. [5]mailto:starchild at lp.org
> 
>      3. [6]mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
> 
>      4. [7]mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
> 
>      5. [8]mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
> 
>      6. [9]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
> 
>      7. [10]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>      8. [11]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>      9. [12]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
> 
>     10. [13]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     11. [14]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     12. [15]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
> 
>     13. [16]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
> 
>     14. [17]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     15. [18]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     16. [19]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
> 
>     17. [20]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     18. [21]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     19. [22]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
> 
>     20. [23]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
> 
>     21. [24]mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
> 
>     22. [25]mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
> 
>     23. [26]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
> 
>     24. [27]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     25. [28]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     26. [29]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>     27. [30]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     28. [31]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     29. [32]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>     30. [33]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
> 
>     31. [34]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     32. [35]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     33. [36]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>     34. [37]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     35. [38]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     36. [39]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>     37. [40]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
> 
>     38. [41]mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
> 
>     39. [42]mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
> 
>     40. [43]mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
> 
>     41. [44]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
> 
>     42. [45]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     43. [46]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     44. [47]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
> 
>     45. [48]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     46. [49]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     47. [50]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
> 
>     48. [51]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
> 
>     49. [52]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     50. [53]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     51. [54]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>     52. [55]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     53. [56]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     54. [57]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>     55. [58]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
> 
>     56. [59]mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
> 
>     57. [60]mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
> 
>     58. [61]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
> 
>     59. [62]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     60. [63]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     61. [64]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>     62. [65]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     63. [66]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     64. [67]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>     65. [68]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
> 
>     66. [69]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     67. [70]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     68. [71]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>     69. [72]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
> 
>     70. [73]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 
>     71. [74]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
>     72. [75]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
> 
>     73. [76]mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
> 
> References
> 
>   1. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
>   2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Moore_sexual_misconduct_allegations
>   3. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
>   4. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>   5. mailto:starchild at lp.org
>   6. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
>   7. mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
>   8. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
>   9. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>  10. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>  11. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  12. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
>  13. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>  14. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  15. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
>  16. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>  17. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>  18. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  19. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
>  20. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>  21. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  22. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
>  23. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>  24. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
>  25. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
>  26. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>  27. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>  28. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  29. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>  30. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>  31. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  32. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>  33. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>  34. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>  35. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  36. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>  37. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>  38. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  39. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>  40. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>  41. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
>  42. mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
>  43. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
>  44. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>  45. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>  46. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  47. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
>  48. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>  49. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  50. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
>  51. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>  52. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>  53. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  54. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>  55. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>  56. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  57. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>  58. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>  59. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
>  60. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
>  61. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>  62. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>  63. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  64. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>  65. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>  66. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  67. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>  68. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>  69. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>  70. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  71. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>  72. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>  73. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  74. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>  75. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>  76. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com




More information about the Lnc-business mailing list