[Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2018-03: Censure of Arvin Vohra

Caryn Ann Harlos caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
Wed Jan 31 04:01:50 EST 2018


==    A statement describing a group of people as "fair game" sounds like
describing them as animals to be hunted, rather than individual human
beings with rights. I would reject that characterization.===

You do know that is not what that means, right?  It doesn't even come from
that back in the mists of time.  Are you looking to just find something to
nitpick? (scouring my brain to wonder what strange allusion could be made
from nitpick.... and scouring.... does that have some totally unrelated
association?)

fair game
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fair_game#mw-head>
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fair_game#p-search>
English[edit
<https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=fair_game&action=edit&section=1>
]Noun[edit
<https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=fair_game&action=edit&section=2>
]

*fair <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fair#English> game
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/game#English>* (*uncountable
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Glossary#uncountable>*)

   1. (idiomatic
   <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Glossary#idiomatic>) Actions
   permissible <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/permissible> by the rules
   <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/rule>.*Pretending to be slow is fair
   game. Pretending to be injured is not.**The referee ruled the
   unprecedented play fair game.*
   2. (idiomatic
   <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Glossary#idiomatic>) A goal
   <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/goal> or an object
   <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/object> that may legitimately
   <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/legitimately> be sought.*After the
   middle sister's call from a friend's house, her slice of cake was fair
   game.*
   3. (idiomatic
   <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Glossary#idiomatic>) An
   acceptable <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/acceptable> subject or target
   for criticism <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/criticism>, scrutiny
   <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/scrutiny>, or mockery
   <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/mockery>.*Anyone running for office
   is fair game for criticism.*
   4. Used other than with a figurative or idiomatic meaning: *see* fair
   <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fair#English>,‎ game
   <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/game#English>.: a game that is fair,
   that does not involve cheating <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cheat>,
   etc.





      ==  "Pervert" is a loaded term commonly applied to demonize anyone
whose sexual habits are not considered acceptable.===

And is apt for predators upon children.

== It has been applied to LGBTQ people and others===

I haven't.


== and I don't think it is appropriate in what should be a rational
discussion about human development and the capacity to consent.===

Now you get the point.  In that subthread, the possibility of a pervert,
molestor, whatever, impregnating a 14-year old girl was obviously on
everyone's mind, and hey, as long as he has a job, it's better than another
kid.

Funny on how you are upset about us allegedly policing Arvin, yet you are
straining at gnats to try to police me here (oh oh, is there some odd
connection with gnats...... I think I am safe)

=== I haven't heard that Arvin ever used the term (hopefully not).===

I don't follow him any longer.  But I never have seen it.

   === In the case of Roy Moore, he has been credibly accused of sexual
assault (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Moore_sexual_misconduct_
allegations, in particular the case of Beverly Young Nelson). ===

He has been accused as well, including by us by implication, of DE FACTO
assault due to age.


===He is also an authoritarian-leaning politician who wants to force his
morality on others at the point of government guns. I don't think we owe
him an apology.===

Oh.... its okay to be a hypocrite as a Party as long as it is a bad guy.
Can we say he kicks puppies too?    I don't think we owe him an apology
either. But then again, I am not defending the normalcy of 14-year olds
being a typical part of a dating pool and getting offended if someone calls
someone who routinely targets same a pervert.

I was playing with Barbie dolls still when I was 14.  As were a lot of my
friends.  Some of them had clumsy sexual relationships with other barely
teens.  Arvin claimed that the moral value of that is exactly the same as
with a 25 year old.  And I have every right to think that is a perverse
view.  We do not raise our children today to be ready to take on adult
lives at 14.  We lament when children, due to unfortunate circumstances are
forced into that role.  We are a prosperous society that has the resources
to allow an actual childhood.

You can be offended that I have a very bad opinion of 14 year old American
girls being part of the potential mating pool.  I'll live.  If that's my
worst "libertarian heresy" well, burn me at the stake.


On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:06 AM, Starchild <starchild at lp.org> wrote:

>     After some difficult deliberation, I vote no on this motion. No one
>    has yet been able to identify anything the vice-chair said that is
>    clearly un-libertarian, and while I continue to think that some of his
>    outreach efforts have shown poor judgement, and have obviously upset
>    many people, I cannot endorse the misguided set of priorities that
>    would be implicitly endorsed by censuring someone in a case like this
>    while failing to censure other Libertarian leaders such as William Weld
>    last year who have said clearly un-libertarian things from a much more
>    visible platform.
>
>    Love & Liberty,
>                                       ((( starchild )))
>    At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>                             [1]RealReform at earthlink.net
>                                     (415) 625-FREE
>
>    On Jan 31, 2018, at 12:01 AM, Starchild wrote:
>
>    A statement describing a group of people as "fair game" sounds like
>    describing them as animals to be hunted, rather than individual human
>    beings with rights. I would reject that characterization.
>    "Pervert" is a loaded term commonly applied to demonize anyone whose
>    sexual habits are not considered acceptable. It has been applied to
>    LGBTQ people and others, and I don't think it is appropriate in what
>    should be a rational discussion about human development and the
>    capacity to consent. I haven't heard that Arvin ever used the term
>    (hopefully not).
>    In the case of Roy Moore, he has been credibly accused of sexual
>    assault (see
>    [2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Moore_sexual_misconduct_allegation
>    s, in particular the case of Beverly Young Nelson). He is also an
>    authoritarian-leaning politician who wants to force his morality on
>    others at the point of government guns. I don't think we owe him an
>    apology.
>    Love & Liberty,
>                                       ((( starchild )))
>    At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>                             [3]RealReform at earthlink.net
>                                     (415) 625-FREE
>    On Jan 30, 2018, at 10:12 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>
>       And again if 14 year old girls are typically fair game- I ask again
>      -
>
>       does anyone defending that statement here have the fortitude to
>      move a
>
>       resolution to apologize to Roy Moore?
>
>       On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:10 PM Caryn Ann Harlos
>
>       <[1]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>
>       I am using words the way people heard them and that was the
>      implication
>
>       of what he said.  He would rather even someone he thinks is a
>      pervert
>
>       (they do exist  - and they do troll after kids) as long as they
>      have a
>
>       job to impregnate a 14 year old than another kid.  Because welfare.
>
>       Yes - when put in the stark cold reality of the implications of
>      what he
>
>       said it IS awful.  And that�s what our members heard.  Many of them
>
>       just as �pure� as Arvin.
>
>       On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:29 PM Starchild <[2]starchild at lp.org>
>      wrote:
>
>         Caryn Ann,
>
>                 Mary Ruwart's comment is clearly weighing in on our
>      debate
>
>         on this motion, and her stance seems plain enough. It's hard to
>
>         imagine she'd object to us seeing her remarks in a timely manner,
>      so
>
>         accusing Arvin of "using people" by publishing them here seems
>
>         uncalled for. As does the use of demonizing epithets like
>      "pervert".
>
>         I frankly find that language offensive, and hope we can keep the
>
>         discussion more civil.
>
>         Love & Liberty,
>
>                                            ((( starchild )))
>
>         At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>
>                                  [3]RealReform at earthlink.net
>
>                                         (415) 625-FREE
>
>         On Jan 30, 2018, at 8:52 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>
>      And of course that was not the point.
>
>      I would love to speak with Dr. Ruwart on this, the author of
>
>         "The
>
>      Compassion of Libertarianism" about how we need less empathy and
>
>         ya
>
>      know, if a 14 year old gets pregnant, might as well be a pervert
>
>         with a
>
>      job rather than a broke kid.  Because welfare.
>
>      This is called using people.
>
>      On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:56 PM, Arvin Vohra
>
>         <[1][4]votevohra at gmail.com>
>
>      wrote:
>
>           Forward from Dr. Mary Ruwart:
>
>           �If such motions had circulated in the LNC in the early
>
>         days of
>
>        our
>
>           Party, no LNC member would have spoken out against the War
>
>         on
>
>        Drugs,
>
>           claimed that gays had rights, or pointed out that taxation
>
>         was
>
>        theft.
>
>           All of these positions were considered inflammatory and
>
>         offensive
>
>        to
>
>           the majority of people outside the LP for most of the
>
>         1980s,
>
>        regardless
>
>           of how carefully these positions were presented. Now, they
>
>         are
>
>           seriously embraced or considered across the political
>
>         spectrum
>
>           precisely because we spoke out. It�s impossible to affect
>
>         serious
>
>           change without offending some listeners. How can anyone
>
>         believe
>
>        that
>
>           the LP supports free speech when its own members are
>
>         punished for
>
>           engaging in it?�  ----Mary J. Ruwart
>
>         On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:45 AM,
>
>         <[1][2][5]david.demarest at lp.org>
>
>      wrote:
>
>           I change my vote to "YES" on the censure motion and ask
>
>         others to
>
>           vote 'YES' and request the cancellation of the electronic
>
>         meeting
>
>      to
>
>           consider suspension.
>
>           Arvin has audaciously and courageously challenged us to
>
>         stop
>
>           speaking in tongues about our Libertarian principles. He
>
>         has
>
>           correctly identified the fact that the opposition does a
>
>         better
>
>      job
>
>           of describing our policy and positions than we do. We need
>
>         to step
>
>           up to the plate with equal courage and get us back on track
>
>         toward
>
>           our shared goal of freedom.
>
>           It is time to end this game of Russian roulette that Ms.
>
>         Mattson
>
>      has
>
>           aptly described as a circular firing squad, this
>
>           political-correctness nightmare of timidity before voters
>
>         and
>
>           pandemic get-elected-itis at the expense of not only our
>
>      principles
>
>           but any semblance of rationality. We have done enough
>
>         damage to
>
>      the
>
>           Libertarian cause. Let us cease this endless cycle of
>
>           self-destruction before we plunge ourselves into a
>
>         death-spiral of
>
>           reworded censure motions.
>
>           Good grief - enough already!
>
>           ~David Pratt Demarest
>
>         On 2018-01-29 22:11, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>
>           I hope my statement that the censure will fail is
>
>         disproven.  I am
>
>              disappointed in the yes votes changing to no.  This
>
>         censure is
>
>           woefully
>
>              inadequate, but it is not as woefully inadequate as
>
>         nothing at
>
>           all.
>
>              What we heard from Arvin is a defense of Trump tactics.
>
>         That
>
>      is
>
>           not
>
>              the LP I work for, recruit for, and donate for.
>
>              On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:00 PM, Patrick McKnight
>
>                <[1][2][3][6]patrick.mcknight at lp.org> wrote:
>
>                     I vote yes. However I feel censure is
>
>         insufficient and
>
>        look
>
>                  forward to
>
>                     the electronic meeting.
>
>                     Thanks,
>
>                     Patrick McKnight
>
>                     Region 8 Rep
>
>                     On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:21 PM, Tim Hagan
>
>                  <[1][2][3][4][7]tim.hagan at lp.org>
>
>                   wrote:
>
>                     I vote yes.
>
>                     ---
>
>                     Tim Hagan
>
>                     Treasurer, Libertarian National Committee
>
>                   On 2018-01-20 19:03, Alicia Mattson wrote:
>
>                   We have an electronic mail ballot.
>
>                      Votes are due to the LNC-Business list by
>
>         January 30,
>
>           2018 at
>
>                      11:59:59pm Pacific time.
>
>                      Co-Sponsors:  Hayes, Hewitt, Demarest, Hagan
>
>                      Motion:  to censure LNC Vice Chair Arvin Vohra
>
>         for
>
>           repeated
>
>                public
>
>                      comments which have presented libertarian ideas
>
>         in an
>
>                inflammatory
>
>                   and
>
>                      sometimes offensive manner not conducive to
>
>         Libertarian
>
>                leaders and
>
>                      candidates for public office winning hearts and
>
>         minds
>
>      for
>
>                those
>
>                   ideas.
>
>                      -Alicia
>
>                     _______________________________________________
>
>                     Lnc-business mailing list
>
>                       [2][3][4][5][8]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>                       [3][4][5][6][9]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
>
>             /mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>                  References
>
>                     1. mailto:[5][6][7][10]tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>                   2. mailto:[6][7][8][11]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>                   3. [7][8][9][12]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
>
>             ilman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>             References
>
>                1. mailto:[9][10][13]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>
>                2. mailto:[10][11][14]tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>                3. mailto:[11][12][15]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>                4. [12][13][16]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
>
>        mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>                5. mailto:[13][14][17]tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>                6. mailto:[14][15][18]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>                7. [15][16][19]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
>
>        mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>           --
>
>           Arvin Vohra
>
>           [16][17][20]www.VoteVohra.com
>
>           [17][18][21]VoteVohra at gmail.com
>
>           [19](301) 320-3634
>
>        References
>
>           1. mailto:[20][22]david.demarest at lp.org
>
>           2. mailto:[21][23]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>
>           3. mailto:[22][24]tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>           4. mailto:[23][25]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>           5.
>
>         [24][26]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>           6. mailto:[25][27]tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>           7. mailto:[26][28]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>           8.
>
>         [27][29]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>           9. mailto:[28][30]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>
>          10. mailto:[29][31]tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>          11. mailto:[30][32]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>          12.
>
>         [31][33]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>          13. mailto:[32][34]tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>          14. mailto:[33][35]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>          15.
>
>         [34][36]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>          16. [35][37]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>
>          17. mailto:[36][38]VoteVohra at gmail.com
>
>      References
>
>      1. mailto:[39]votevohra at gmail.com
>
>      2. mailto:[40]david.demarest at lp.org
>
>      3. mailto:[41]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>
>      4. mailto:[42]tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      5. mailto:[43]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      6. [44]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
>
>      7. mailto:[45]tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      8. mailto:[46]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      9. [47]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
>
>      10. mailto:[48]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>
>      11. mailto:[49]tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      12. mailto:[50]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      13. [51]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>      14. mailto:[52]tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      15. mailto:[53]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      16. [54]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>      17. [55]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>
>      18. mailto:[56]VoteVohra at gmail.com
>
>      19. tel:(301) 320-3634
>
>      20. mailto:[57]david.demarest at lp.org
>
>      21. mailto:[58]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>
>      22. mailto:[59]tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      23. mailto:[60]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      24. [61]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>      25. mailto:[62]tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      26. mailto:[63]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      27. [64]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>      28. mailto:[65]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>
>      29. mailto:[66]tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      30. mailto:[67]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      31. [68]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>      32. mailto:[69]tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      33. mailto:[70]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      34. [71]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>      35. [72]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>
>      36. mailto:[73]VoteVohra at gmail.com
>
>      References
>
>       1. [4]mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>
>       2. [5]mailto:starchild at lp.org
>
>       3. [6]mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
>
>       4. [7]mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
>
>       5. [8]mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
>
>       6. [9]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>
>       7. [10]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>       8. [11]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>       9. [12]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
>
>      10. [13]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      11. [14]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      12. [15]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
>
>      13. [16]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>
>      14. [17]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      15. [18]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      16. [19]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
>
>      17. [20]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      18. [21]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      19. [22]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
>
>      20. [23]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>
>      21. [24]mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
>
>      22. [25]mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
>
>      23. [26]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>
>      24. [27]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      25. [28]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      26. [29]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>      27. [30]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      28. [31]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      29. [32]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>      30. [33]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>
>      31. [34]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      32. [35]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      33. [36]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>      34. [37]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      35. [38]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      36. [39]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>      37. [40]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>
>      38. [41]mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
>
>      39. [42]mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
>
>      40. [43]mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
>
>      41. [44]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>
>      42. [45]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      43. [46]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      44. [47]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
>
>      45. [48]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      46. [49]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      47. [50]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
>
>      48. [51]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>
>      49. [52]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      50. [53]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      51. [54]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>      52. [55]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      53. [56]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      54. [57]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>      55. [58]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>
>      56. [59]mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
>
>      57. [60]mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
>
>      58. [61]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>
>      59. [62]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      60. [63]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      61. [64]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>      62. [65]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      63. [66]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      64. [67]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>      65. [68]mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>
>      66. [69]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      67. [70]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      68. [71]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>      69. [72]mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>
>      70. [73]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>      71. [74]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>      72. [75]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>
>      73. [76]mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
>
> References
>
>    1. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
>    2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Moore_sexual_misconduct_
> allegations
>    3. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
>    4. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>    5. mailto:starchild at lp.org
>    6. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
>    7. mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
>    8. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
>    9. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>   10. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>   11. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   12. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
>   13. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>   14. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   15. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
>   16. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>   17. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>   18. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   19. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
>   20. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>   21. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   22. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
>   23. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>   24. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
>   25. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
>   26. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>   27. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>   28. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   29. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>   30. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>   31. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   32. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>   33. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>   34. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>   35. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   36. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>   37. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>   38. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   39. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>   40. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>   41. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
>   42. mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
>   43. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
>   44. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>   45. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>   46. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   47. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
>   48. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>   49. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   50. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
>   51. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>   52. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>   53. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   54. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>   55. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>   56. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   57. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>   58. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>   59. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
>   60. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
>   61. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>   62. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>   63. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   64. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>   65. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>   66. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   67. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>   68. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
>   69. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>   70. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   71. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>   72. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
>   73. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   74. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>   75. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>   76. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
   ==    A statement describing a group of people as "fair game" sounds
   like describing them as animals to be hunted, rather than individual
   human beings with rights. I would reject that characterization.===
   You do know that is not what that means, right?  It doesn't even come
   from that back in the mists of time.  Are you looking to just find
   something to nitpick? (scouring my brain to wonder what strange
   allusion could be made from nitpick.... and scouring.... does that have
   some totally unrelated association?)

fair game

English[[1]edit]

Noun[[2]edit]

   [3]fair [4]game ([5]uncountable)
    1. ([6]idiomatic) Actions [7]permissible by the [8]rules.

                Pretending to be slow is fair game. Pretending to be
                injured is not.
                The referee ruled the unprecedented play fair game.

    2. ([9]idiomatic) A [10]goal or an [11]object that
       may [12]legitimately be sought.

                After the middle sister's call from a friend's house, her
                slice of cake was fair game.

    3. ([13]idiomatic) An [14]acceptable subject or target
       for [15]criticism, [16]scrutiny, or [17]mockery.

                Anyone running for office is fair game for criticism.

    4. Used other than with a figurative or idiomatic
       meaning: see [18]fair,� [19]game.: a game that is fair, that does
       not involve [20]cheating, etc.

         ==  "Pervert" is a loaded term commonly applied to demonize
   anyone whose sexual habits are not considered acceptable.===
   And is apt for predators upon children.
   == It has been applied to LGBTQ people and others===
   I haven't.
   == and I don't think it is appropriate in what should be a rational
   discussion about human development and the capacity to consent.===
   Now you get the point.  In that subthread, the possibility of a
   pervert, molestor, whatever, impregnating a 14-year old girl was
   obviously on everyone's mind, and hey, as long as he has a job, it's
   better than another kid.
   Funny on how you are upset about us allegedly policing Arvin, yet you
   are straining at gnats to try to police me here (oh oh, is there some
   odd connection with gnats...... I think I am safe)
   === I haven't heard that Arvin ever used the term (hopefully not).===
   I don't follow him any longer.  But I never have seen it.
      === In the case of Roy Moore, he has been credibly accused of sexual
   assault (see [21]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
   Roy_Moore_sexual_misconduct_allegations, in particular the case of
   Beverly Young Nelson). ===
   He has been accused as well, including by us by implication, of DE
   FACTO assault due to age.
   ===He is also an authoritarian-leaning politician who wants to force
   his morality on others at the point of government guns. I don't think
   we owe him an apology.===
   Oh.... its okay to be a hypocrite as a Party as long as it is a bad
   guy.  Can we say he kicks puppies too?    I don't think we owe him an
   apology either. But then again, I am not defending the normalcy of
   14-year olds being a typical part of a dating pool and getting offended
   if someone calls someone who routinely targets same a pervert.
   I was playing with Barbie dolls still when I was 14.  As were a lot of
   my friends.  Some of them had clumsy sexual relationships with other
   barely teens.  Arvin claimed that the moral value of that is exactly
   the same as with a 25 year old.  And I have every right to think that
   is a perverse view.  We do not raise our children today to be ready to
   take on adult lives at 14.  We lament when children, due to unfortunate
   circumstances are forced into that role.  We are a prosperous society
   that has the resources to allow an actual childhood.
   You can be offended that I have a very bad opinion of 14 year old
   American girls being part of the potential mating pool.  I'll live.  If
   that's my worst "libertarian heresy" well, burn me at the stake.

   On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:06 AM, Starchild <[22]starchild at lp.org>
   wrote:

         After some difficult deliberation, I vote no on this motion. No
     one
        has yet been able to identify anything the vice-chair said that
     is
        clearly un-libertarian, and while I continue to think that some
     of his
        outreach efforts have shown poor judgement, and have obviously
     upset
        many people, I cannot endorse the misguided set of priorities
     that
        would be implicitly endorsed by censuring someone in a case like
     this
        while failing to censure other Libertarian leaders such as
     William Weld
        last year who have said clearly un-libertarian things from a much
     more
        visible platform.
        Love & Liberty,
                                           ((( starchild )))
        At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
                                 [1][23]RealReform at earthlink.net
                                         (415) 625-FREE
        On Jan 31, 2018, at 12:01 AM, Starchild wrote:
        A statement describing a group of people as "fair game" sounds
     like
        describing them as animals to be hunted, rather than individual
     human
        beings with rights. I would reject that characterization.
        "Pervert" is a loaded term commonly applied to demonize anyone
     whose
        sexual habits are not considered acceptable. It has been applied
     to
        LGBTQ people and others, and I don't think it is appropriate in
     what
        should be a rational discussion about human development and the
        capacity to consent. I haven't heard that Arvin ever used the
     term
        (hopefully not).
        In the case of Roy Moore, he has been credibly accused of sexual
        assault (see
        [2][24]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Moore_sexual_
     misconduct_allegation
        s, in particular the case of Beverly Young Nelson). He is also an
        authoritarian-leaning politician who wants to force his morality
     on
        others at the point of government guns. I don't think we owe him
     an
        apology.
        Love & Liberty,
                                           ((( starchild )))
        At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
                                 [3][25]RealReform at earthlink.net
                                         (415) 625-FREE
        On Jan 30, 2018, at 10:12 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
           And again if 14 year old girls are typically fair game- I ask
     again
          -
           does anyone defending that statement here have the fortitude
     to
          move a
           resolution to apologize to Roy Moore?
           On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:10 PM Caryn Ann Harlos
           <[1][26]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
           I am using words the way people heard them and that was the
          implication
           of what he said.  He would rather even someone he thinks is a
          pervert
           (they do exist  - and they do troll after kids) as long as
     they
          have a
           job to impregnate a 14 year old than another kid.  Because
     welfare.
           Yes - when put in the stark cold reality of the implications
     of
          what he
           said it IS awful.  And that�s what our members heard.  Many
     of them
           just as �pure� as Arvin.

         On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:29 PM Starchild
   <[2][27]starchild at lp.org>
        wrote:
           Caryn Ann,
                   Mary Ruwart's comment is clearly weighing in on our
        debate
           on this motion, and her stance seems plain enough. It's hard to
           imagine she'd object to us seeing her remarks in a timely
   manner,
        so
           accusing Arvin of "using people" by publishing them here seems
           uncalled for. As does the use of demonizing epithets like
        "pervert".
           I frankly find that language offensive, and hope we can keep
   the
           discussion more civil.
           Love & Liberty,
                                              ((( starchild )))
           At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
                                    [3][28]RealReform at earthlink.net
                                           (415) 625-FREE
           On Jan 30, 2018, at 8:52 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
        And of course that was not the point.
        I would love to speak with Dr. Ruwart on this, the author of
           "The
        Compassion of Libertarianism" about how we need less empathy and
           ya
        know, if a 14 year old gets pregnant, might as well be a pervert
           with a
        job rather than a broke kid.  Because welfare.
        This is called using people.
        On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:56 PM, Arvin Vohra
           <[1][4][29]votevohra at gmail.com>
        wrote:
             Forward from Dr. Mary Ruwart:

               �If such motions had circulated in the LNC in the early
             days of
            our
               Party, no LNC member would have spoken out against the War
             on
            Drugs,
               claimed that gays had rights, or pointed out that taxation
             was
            theft.
               All of these positions were considered inflammatory and
             offensive
            to
               the majority of people outside the LP for most of the
             1980s,
            regardless
               of how carefully these positions were presented. Now, they
             are
               seriously embraced or considered across the political
             spectrum
               precisely because we spoke out. It�s impossible to
     affect
             serious
               change without offending some listeners. How can anyone
             believe
            that
               the LP supports free speech when its own members are
             punished for
               engaging in it?�  ----Mary J. Ruwart

           On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:45 AM,
           <[1][2][5][30]david.demarest at lp.org>
        wrote:
             I change my vote to "YES" on the censure motion and ask
           others to
             vote 'YES' and request the cancellation of the electronic
           meeting
        to
             consider suspension.
             Arvin has audaciously and courageously challenged us to
           stop
             speaking in tongues about our Libertarian principles. He
           has
             correctly identified the fact that the opposition does a
           better
        job
             of describing our policy and positions than we do. We need
           to step
             up to the plate with equal courage and get us back on track
           toward
             our shared goal of freedom.
             It is time to end this game of Russian roulette that Ms.
           Mattson
        has
             aptly described as a circular firing squad, this
             political-correctness nightmare of timidity before voters
           and
             pandemic get-elected-itis at the expense of not only our
        principles
             but any semblance of rationality. We have done enough
           damage to
        the
             Libertarian cause. Let us cease this endless cycle of
             self-destruction before we plunge ourselves into a
           death-spiral of
             reworded censure motions.
             Good grief - enough already!
             ~David Pratt Demarest
           On 2018-01-29 22:11, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
             I hope my statement that the censure will fail is
           disproven.  I am
                disappointed in the yes votes changing to no.  This
           censure is
             woefully
                inadequate, but it is not as woefully inadequate as
           nothing at
             all.
                What we heard from Arvin is a defense of Trump tactics.
           That
        is
             not
                the LP I work for, recruit for, and donate for.
                On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:00 PM, Patrick McKnight
                  <[1][2][3][6][31]patrick.mcknight at lp.org> wrote:
                       I vote yes. However I feel censure is
           insufficient and
          look
                    forward to
                       the electronic meeting.
                       Thanks,
                       Patrick McKnight
                       Region 8 Rep
                       On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:21 PM, Tim Hagan
                    <[1][2][3][4][7][32]tim.hagan at lp.org>
                     wrote:
                       I vote yes.
                       ---
                       Tim Hagan
                       Treasurer, Libertarian National Committee
                     On 2018-01-20 19:03, Alicia Mattson wrote:
                     We have an electronic mail ballot.
                        Votes are due to the LNC-Business list by
           January 30,
             2018 at
                        11:59:59pm Pacific time.
                        Co-Sponsors:  Hayes, Hewitt, Demarest, Hagan
                        Motion:  to censure LNC Vice Chair Arvin Vohra
           for
             repeated
                  public
                        comments which have presented libertarian ideas
           in an
                  inflammatory
                     and
                        sometimes offensive manner not conducive to
           Libertarian
                  leaders and
                        candidates for public office winning hearts and
           minds
        for
                  those
                     ideas.
                        -Alicia
                       _______________________________________________
                       Lnc-business mailing list
                         [2][3][4][5][8][33]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
                         [3][4][5][6][9][34]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
               /mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
                    References
                       1. mailto:[5][6][7][10][35]tim.hagan at lp.org
                     2. mailto:[6][7][8][11][36]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
                     3. [7][8][9][12][37]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
               ilman/listinfo/lnc-business
               References
                  1. mailto:[9][10][13][38]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
                  2. mailto:[10][11][14][39]tim.hagan at lp.org
                  3. mailto:[11][12][15][40]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
                  4. [12][13][16][41]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
          mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
                  5. mailto:[13][14][17][42]tim.hagan at lp.org
                  6. mailto:[14][15][18][43]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
                  7. [15][16][19][44]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
          mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
             --
             Arvin Vohra
             [16][17][20][45]www.VoteVohra.com
             [17][18][21][46]VoteVohra at gmail.com
             [19][47](301) 320-3634
          References
             1. mailto:[20][22][48]david.demarest at lp.org
             2. mailto:[21][23][49]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
             3. mailto:[22][24][50]tim.hagan at lp.org
             4. mailto:[23][25][51]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
             5.
           [24][26][52]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-
   business
             6. mailto:[25][27][53]tim.hagan at lp.org
             7. mailto:[26][28][54]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
             8.
           [27][29][55]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-
   business
             9. mailto:[28][30][56]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
            10. mailto:[29][31][57]tim.hagan at lp.org
            11. mailto:[30][32][58]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
            12.
           [31][33][59]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-
   business
            13. mailto:[32][34][60]tim.hagan at lp.org
            14. mailto:[33][35][61]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
            15.
           [34][36][62]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-
   business
            16. [35][37][63]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
            17. mailto:[36][38][64]VoteVohra at gmail.com
        References
        1. mailto:[39][65]votevohra at gmail.com
        2. mailto:[40][66]david.demarest at lp.org
        3. mailto:[41][67]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
        4. mailto:[42][68]tim.hagan at lp.org
        5. mailto:[43][69]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
        6. [44][70]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
        7. mailto:[45][71]tim.hagan at lp.org
        8. mailto:[46][72]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
        9. [47][73]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
        10. mailto:[48][74]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
        11. mailto:[49][75]tim.hagan at lp.org
        12. mailto:[50][76]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
        13. [51][77]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
        14. mailto:[52][78]tim.hagan at lp.org
        15. mailto:[53][79]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
        16. [54][80]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
        17. [55][81]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
        18. mailto:[56][82]VoteVohra at gmail.com
        19. tel:[83](301) 320-3634
        20. mailto:[57][84]david.demarest at lp.org
        21. mailto:[58][85]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
        22. mailto:[59][86]tim.hagan at lp.org
        23. mailto:[60][87]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
        24. [61][88]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
        25. mailto:[62][89]tim.hagan at lp.org
        26. mailto:[63][90]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
        27. [64][91]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
        28. mailto:[65][92]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
        29. mailto:[66][93]tim.hagan at lp.org
        30. mailto:[67][94]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
        31. [68][95]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
        32. mailto:[69][96]tim.hagan at lp.org
        33. mailto:[70][97]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
        34. [71][98]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
        35. [72][99]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
        36. mailto:[73][100]VoteVohra at gmail.com
        References

           1. [4]mailto:[101]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
           2. [5]mailto:[102]starchild at lp.org
           3. [6]mailto:[103]RealReform at earthlink.net
           4. [7]mailto:[104]votevohra at gmail.com
           5. [8]mailto:[105]david.demarest at lp.org
           6. [9]mailto:[106]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
           7. [10]mailto:[107]tim.hagan at lp.org
           8. [11]mailto:[108]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
           9. [12][109]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
          10. [13]mailto:[110]tim.hagan at lp.org
          11. [14]mailto:[111]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
          12. [15][112]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
          13. [16]mailto:[113]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
          14. [17]mailto:[114]tim.hagan at lp.org
          15. [18]mailto:[115]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
          16. [19][116]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
          17. [20]mailto:[117]tim.hagan at lp.org
          18. [21]mailto:[118]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
          19. [22][119]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
          20. [23][120]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
          21. [24]mailto:[121]VoteVohra at gmail.com
          22. [25]mailto:[122]david.demarest at lp.org
          23. [26]mailto:[123]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
          24. [27]mailto:[124]tim.hagan at lp.org
          25. [28]mailto:[125]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
          26. [29][126]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
     mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
          27. [30]mailto:[127]tim.hagan at lp.org
          28. [31]mailto:[128]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
          29. [32][129]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
     mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
          30. [33]mailto:[130]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
          31. [34]mailto:[131]tim.hagan at lp.org
          32. [35]mailto:[132]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
          33. [36][133]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
     mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
          34. [37]mailto:[134]tim.hagan at lp.org
          35. [38]mailto:[135]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
          36. [39][136]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
     mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
          37. [40][137]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
          38. [41]mailto:[138]VoteVohra at gmail.com
          39. [42]mailto:[139]votevohra at gmail.com
          40. [43]mailto:[140]david.demarest at lp.org
          41. [44]mailto:[141]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
          42. [45]mailto:[142]tim.hagan at lp.org
          43. [46]mailto:[143]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
          44. [47][144]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
          45. [48]mailto:[145]tim.hagan at lp.org
          46. [49]mailto:[146]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
          47. [50][147]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
          48. [51]mailto:[148]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
          49. [52]mailto:[149]tim.hagan at lp.org
          50. [53]mailto:[150]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
          51. [54][151]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
     mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
          52. [55]mailto:[152]tim.hagan at lp.org
          53. [56]mailto:[153]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
          54. [57][154]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
     mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
          55. [58][155]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
          56. [59]mailto:[156]VoteVohra at gmail.com
          57. [60]mailto:[157]david.demarest at lp.org
          58. [61]mailto:[158]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
          59. [62]mailto:[159]tim.hagan at lp.org
          60. [63]mailto:[160]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
          61. [64][161]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
     mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
          62. [65]mailto:[162]tim.hagan at lp.org
          63. [66]mailto:[163]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
          64. [67][164]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
     mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
          65. [68]mailto:[165]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
          66. [69]mailto:[166]tim.hagan at lp.org
          67. [70]mailto:[167]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
          68. [71][168]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
     mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
          69. [72]mailto:[169]tim.hagan at lp.org
          70. [73]mailto:[170]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
          71. [74][171]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
     mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
          72. [75][172]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
          73. [76]mailto:[173]VoteVohra at gmail.com
     References
        1. mailto:[174]RealReform at earthlink.net
        2. [175]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
     Roy_Moore_sexual_misconduct_allegations
        3. mailto:[176]RealReform at earthlink.net
        4. mailto:[177]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
        5. mailto:[178]starchild at lp.org
        6. mailto:[179]RealReform at earthlink.net
        7. mailto:[180]votevohra at gmail.com
        8. mailto:[181]david.demarest at lp.org
        9. mailto:[182]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
       10. mailto:[183]tim.hagan at lp.org
       11. mailto:[184]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       12. [185]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
       13. mailto:[186]tim.hagan at lp.org
       14. mailto:[187]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       15. [188]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
       16. mailto:[189]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
       17. mailto:[190]tim.hagan at lp.org
       18. mailto:[191]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       19. [192]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
       20. mailto:[193]tim.hagan at lp.org
       21. mailto:[194]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       22. [195]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
       23. [196]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
       24. mailto:[197]VoteVohra at gmail.com
       25. mailto:[198]david.demarest at lp.org
       26. mailto:[199]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
       27. mailto:[200]tim.hagan at lp.org
       28. mailto:[201]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       29. [202]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
       30. mailto:[203]tim.hagan at lp.org
       31. mailto:[204]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       32. [205]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
       33. mailto:[206]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
       34. mailto:[207]tim.hagan at lp.org
       35. mailto:[208]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       36. [209]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
       37. mailto:[210]tim.hagan at lp.org
       38. mailto:[211]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       39. [212]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
       40. [213]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
       41. mailto:[214]VoteVohra at gmail.com
       42. mailto:[215]votevohra at gmail.com
       43. mailto:[216]david.demarest at lp.org
       44. mailto:[217]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
       45. mailto:[218]tim.hagan at lp.org
       46. mailto:[219]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       47. [220]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
       48. mailto:[221]tim.hagan at lp.org
       49. mailto:[222]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       50. [223]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
       51. mailto:[224]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
       52. mailto:[225]tim.hagan at lp.org
       53. mailto:[226]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       54. [227]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
       55. mailto:[228]tim.hagan at lp.org
       56. mailto:[229]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       57. [230]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
       58. [231]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
       59. mailto:[232]VoteVohra at gmail.com
       60. mailto:[233]david.demarest at lp.org
       61. mailto:[234]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
       62. mailto:[235]tim.hagan at lp.org
       63. mailto:[236]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       64. [237]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
       65. mailto:[238]tim.hagan at lp.org
       66. mailto:[239]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       67. [240]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
       68. mailto:[241]patrick.mcknight at lp.org
       69. mailto:[242]tim.hagan at lp.org
       70. mailto:[243]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       71. [244]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
       72. mailto:[245]tim.hagan at lp.org
       73. mailto:[246]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       74. [247]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business

     75. [248]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
     76. mailto:[249]VoteVohra at gmail.com

References

   Visible links
   1. https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=fair_game&action=edit&section=1
   2. https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=fair_game&action=edit&section=2
   3. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fair#English
   4. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/game#English
   5. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Glossary#uncountable
   6. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Glossary#idiomatic
   7. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/permissible
   8. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/rule
   9. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Glossary#idiomatic
  10. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/goal
  11. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/object
  12. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/legitimately
  13. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Glossary#idiomatic
  14. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/acceptable
  15. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/criticism
  16. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/scrutiny
  17. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/mockery
  18. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fair#English
  19. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/game#English
  20. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cheat
  21. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Moore_sexual_misconduct_allegations
  22. mailto:starchild at lp.org
  23. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
  24. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Moore_sexual_misconduct_allegation
  25. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
  26. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
  27. mailto:starchild at lp.org
  28. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
  29. mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
  30. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
  31. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
  32. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
  33. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  34. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
  35. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
  36. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  37. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
  38. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
  39. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
  40. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  41. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
  42. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
  43. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  44. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
  45. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
  46. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
  47. tel:(301) 320-3634
  48. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
  49. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
  50. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
  51. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  52. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
  53. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
  54. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  55. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
  56. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
  57. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
  58. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  59. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
  60. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
  61. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  62. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
  63. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
  64. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
  65. mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
  66. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
  67. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
  68. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
  69. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  70. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
  71. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
  72. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  73. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
  74. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
  75. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
  76. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  77. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
  78. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
  79. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  80. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
  81. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
  82. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
  83. tel:(301) 320-3634
  84. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
  85. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
  86. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
  87. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  88. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
  89. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
  90. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  91. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
  92. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
  93. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
  94. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  95. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
  96. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
  97. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  98. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
  99. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
 100. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
 101. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
 102. mailto:starchild at lp.org
 103. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
 104. mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
 105. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
 106. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
 107. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 108. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 109. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
 110. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 111. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 112. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
 113. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
 114. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 115. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 116. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
 117. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 118. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 119. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
 120. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
 121. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
 122. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
 123. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
 124. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 125. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 126. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 127. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 128. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 129. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 130. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
 131. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 132. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 133. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 134. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 135. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 136. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 137. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
 138. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
 139. mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
 140. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
 141. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
 142. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 143. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 144. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
 145. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 146. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 147. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
 148. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
 149. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 150. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 151. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 152. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 153. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 154. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 155. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
 156. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
 157. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
 158. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
 159. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 160. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 161. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 162. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 163. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 164. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 165. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
 166. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 167. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 168. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 169. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 170. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 171. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 172. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
 173. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
 174. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
 175. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Moore_sexual_misconduct_allegations
 176. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
 177. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
 178. mailto:starchild at lp.org
 179. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
 180. mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
 181. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
 182. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
 183. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 184. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 185. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
 186. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 187. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 188. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
 189. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
 190. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 191. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 192. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
 193. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 194. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 195. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/
 196. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
 197. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
 198. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
 199. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
 200. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 201. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 202. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 203. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 204. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 205. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 206. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
 207. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 208. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 209. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 210. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 211. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 212. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 213. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
 214. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
 215. mailto:votevohra at gmail.com
 216. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
 217. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
 218. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 219. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 220. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin
 221. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 222. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 223. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/ma
 224. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
 225. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 226. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 227. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 228. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 229. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 230. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 231. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
 232. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
 233. mailto:david.demarest at lp.org
 234. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
 235. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 236. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 237. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 238. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 239. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 240. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 241. mailto:patrick.mcknight at lp.org
 242. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 243. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 244. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 245. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
 246. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 247. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 248. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
 249. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com

   Hidden links:
 251. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fair_game#mw-head
 252. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fair_game#p-search


More information about the Lnc-business mailing list