[Lnc-business] I assume this is Liberty Hangout's Republican Lies

Nicholas Sarwark chair at lp.org
Thu Feb 1 20:19:27 EST 2018


It appears accurate to me, not sure what else would be necessary to say.

-Nick

On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
<caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>    Would that summary be accurate?  Is there anything else relevant to
>    add?  I only first heard of this today and have been pretty busy to
>    look into it.
>
>    On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 6:08 PM, Nicholas Sarwark <[1]chair at lp.org>
>    wrote:
>
>      You are free to send what you'd like to members who ask you.
>      As I've had to explain more often than I'd like over the last month
>      or
>      two, I'm not the boss of any other LNC member or officer.
>      -Nick
>      On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
>      <[2]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>      >    How about this?
>      >    No, Ron Paul wasn't banned or rejected from speaking at the LP
>      >    convention.  Some interested members spoke to Paul's booking
>      agent who
>      >    indicated that Paul might be interested if his speaking fee of
>      $35,000
>      >    were paid.  This agent also represents Judge Napolitano.  These
>      members
>      >    asked for Paul to be put on the agenda and said they would
>      raise the
>      >    money. Convention agendas cannot be planned in that way.  Also,
>      raising
>      >    that kind of money for a speaker fee from Libertarians would
>      mean that
>      >    there is less funds for very worthy candidates running in 2018
>      and we
>      >    have a lot of talented and informative speakers who are
>      interested for
>      >    a much lower (or no) fee.  If the members raise the money and
>      Paul
>      >    comes, it is extremely unlikely that a spot would not be made
>      for him
>      >    gladly.  We gave Paul an award last year for his long-standing
>      >    contributions to liberty.  Paul himself has never contacted the
>      LP to
>      >    indicate personal interest and was never told he was unwelcome.
>      >
>      >    On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
>      >    <[1][3]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>      >
>      >    That post gets a bit personal.  I guess I will edit it down to
>      just the
>      >    facts and reword.
>      >
>      >    On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:46 PM, Nicholas Sarwark
>      <[2][4]chair at lp.org>
>      >    wrote:
>      >
>      >      What I sent to the list is what I have sent to individual
>      members
>      >      who
>      >      have asked me to comment.
>      >      -Nick
>      >      On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:45 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
>      >      <[3][5]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>      >      >    Nick do we have an official statement that I can send to
>      >      members who
>      >      >    ask?  Or something you summed up?
>      >      >
>      >      >    On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Nicholas Sarwark
>      >      <[1][4][6]chair at lp.org>
>      >      >    wrote:
>      >      >
>      >      >      “A lie will go round the world while truth is pulling
>      its
>      >      boots on.”
>      >      >      Andy Craig from Wisconsin summed up the situation in a
>      >      Facebook post
>      >      >      (
>      >      >      [2][5][7]https://www.facebook.
>      com/Andrew.Craig.Dixie.Pug/posts/
>
>    >
>    >    >      947442695418584
>    >    >      ) that I've copied and pasted below:
>    >    >      "No, Ron Paul wasn't banned or rejected from speaking at
>    the LP
>    >    >      convention.
>    >    >      Some folks with no real agenda other than causing a stink,
>    spoke
>    >    to
>    >    >      Paul's booking agent, who expressed interest if Paul's
>    usual
>    >    >      speaking
>    >    >      fee was paid ($35,000), because that's the job of a booking
>    >    agent.
>    >    >      (The same agent also reps Judge Napolitano, and mentioned
>    that).
>    >    >      This
>    >    >      group then went to the folks handling the convention for
>    the LP,
>    >    >      demanded Paul be put on the agenda, and claimed they'd
>    later
>    >    raise
>    >    >      the
>    >    >      money to pay him. LP didn't bite, for obvious reasons. Even
>    if
>    >    they
>    >    >      could have done it (dubious), the party's not particularly
>    >    >      interested
>    >    >      in seeing Libertarian donors diverted to pay for an
>    exorbitant
>    >    >      speaking fee with no real benefit. If the Mises [sic]
>    Caucus
>    >    would
>    >    >      like to raise and spend that much money and rent a room in
>    New
>    >    >      Orleans
>    >    >      and have Paul speak... well, good luck with that. There's
>    >    nothing
>    >    >      stopping them, though I know a lot of Libertarian
>    candidates who
>    >    >      could
>    >    >      better spend that money in the 2018 elections. There are
>    races
>    >    that
>    >    >      could be won on less money than that.
>    >    >      And if he desires it enough to say he's coming regardless,
>    I
>    >    have
>    >    >      little doubt Paul would be given a slot on the main-stage.
>    It
>    >    was
>    >    >      just
>    >    >      at the last convention that we gave him an award that he
>    >    accepted
>    >    >      via
>    >    >      video message, after all. (An award given with some fair
>    >    internal
>    >    >      grumbling over his lack of support for the party or any of
>    its
>    >    >      candidates, while still often endorsing and supporting
>    >    Republicans).
>    >    >      Short version: much ado about nothing. Ron Paul himself
>    >    expressed no
>    >    >      interest in wanting to speak in New Orleans, and he still
>    >    hasn't.
>    >    >      The whole point of this exercise was never to actually have
>    him
>    >    >      speak,
>    >    >      but rather to frame a purely manufactured controversy, and
>    that
>    >    >      intention is absurdly transparent. I've had plenty of
>    gripes
>    >    about
>    >    >      the
>    >    >      party's management and operations and convention-planning,
>    but
>    >    this
>    >    >      whole thing is nonsense. Speaking slots at the convention
>    don't
>    >    >      really
>    >    >      matter that much (I had one last time!), and nobody from
>    the LP
>    >    told
>    >    >      Paul he was unwelcome in New Orleans."
>    >    >      -Nick
>    >    >
>    >
>
>      >      >    On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 3:32 PM,
>      <[3][6][8]arvin.vohra at lp.org>
>      >      wrote:
>      >      >    > But since people are asking, I thought I'd seek
>      >      clarification.
>      >      >    >
>      >      >    > [4][7][9]http://libertyhangout.
>      org/2018/02/libertarian-party-
>      >      >    wont-let-ron-paul-speak-national-convention/
>      >      >    >
>      >      >
>      >      > References
>      >      >
>      >      >    1. mailto:[8][10]chair at lp.org
>      >      >    2. [9][11]https://www.facebook.com/Andre
>      >      w.Craig.Dixie.Pug/posts/947442695418584
>      >      >    3. mailto:[10][12]arvin.vohra at lp.org
>      >      >    4. [11][13]http://libertyhangout.org/2018
>      >      /02/libertarian-party-wont-let-ron-paul-speak-national-
>      convention/
>      >
>      > References
>      >
>      >    1. mailto:[14]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>      >    2. mailto:[15]chair at lp.org
>      >    3. mailto:[16]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>      >    4. mailto:[17]chair at lp.org
>      >    5. [18]https://www.facebook.com/Andrew.Craig.Dixie.Pug/posts/
>      >    6. mailto:[19]arvin.vohra at lp.org
>      >    7. [20]http://libertyhangout.org/2018/02/libertarian-party-
>      >    8. mailto:[21]chair at lp.org
>      >    9. [22]https://www.facebook.com/Andrew.Craig.Dixie.Pug/posts/
>      947442695418584
>      >   10. mailto:[23]arvin.vohra at lp.org
>      >   11. [24]http://libertyhangout.org/2018/02/libertarian-party-
>      wont-let-ron-paul-speak-national-convention/
>
> References
>
>    1. mailto:chair at lp.org
>    2. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>    3. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>    4. mailto:chair at lp.org
>    5. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>    6. mailto:chair at lp.org
>    7. https://www.facebook.com/Andrew.Craig.Dixie.Pug/posts/
>    8. mailto:arvin.vohra at lp.org
>    9. http://libertyhangout.org/2018/02/libertarian-party-
>   10. mailto:chair at lp.org
>   11. https://www.facebook.com/Andre
>   12. mailto:arvin.vohra at lp.org
>   13. http://libertyhangout.org/2018
>   14. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>   15. mailto:chair at lp.org
>   16. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>   17. mailto:chair at lp.org
>   18. https://www.facebook.com/Andrew.Craig.Dixie.Pug/posts/
>   19. mailto:arvin.vohra at lp.org
>   20. http://libertyhangout.org/2018/02/libertarian-party-
>   21. mailto:chair at lp.org
>   22. https://www.facebook.com/Andrew.Craig.Dixie.Pug/posts/947442695418584
>   23. mailto:arvin.vohra at lp.org
>   24. http://libertyhangout.org/2018/02/libertarian-party-wont-let-ron-paul-speak-national-convention/



More information about the Lnc-business mailing list