[Lnc-business] Platform Committee
Craig Bowden
craig.bowden at lp.org
Fri May 18 13:01:01 EDT 2018
If there is no change to personnel, the committee remains exactly as it
is, I don't see what the issue would be with leaving the LNC position
vacant. The number of members would remain the same, or, another could
potentially be added based on the bylaws as has been mentioned. My
preference would be for more involvement from more members, and if
California would take care of it, that is optimal.
I will stand by my statement that protecting the integrity of the
process is what is of utmost importance. Again, I am not saying I
believe Mr. Starr would abuse this, but there are people that exist who
would let their ambition influence. When I was in the Republican Party
back in the day, there were plenty of people who would love to take
advantage of a situation like this. As we grow, and start becoming more
and more influential in the political realm, the reality is that we will
end up attracting people who seek power and have tendencies to abuse it.
I believe we need to address it to set the precedent. This is not in any
way a punitive measure, but one of common sense to uphold integrity. I
will also restate that since this has apparently become an issue as of
now, we do need to address the bylaws. I don't know the wording to use
and defer to the Bylaws Committee that has been tasked with making these
types of suggestions, but I believe having a process that prevents a
double seat would be important. Unfortunately, common sense doesn't
always rule at the end of the day, and there are people who will use
loopholes to their advantage.
While we cannot foresee every issue that may end up happening, we now
see an issue before us. So the question now is: what do we do?
If California is willing to address it, then the only thing that
remains, in my opinion, is the bylaw addition to address the future. If
California will not, then we should.
Craig Bowden
Region 1 Alternate
On 2018-05-17 22:01, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
> Starchild, yes it could affect quorum. More importantly it could cause
> a voting advantage not shared by other members. I had originally
> ruled
> that he could not occupy two seats due to that reason and was
> over-ruled on appeal by the Committee but that doesn't mean the
> voting
> advantage is not there (it is), it is just decided by the Committee
> that it is allowed.
> What do I mean by voting advantage since it isn't always apparently
> obvious? Well it really could only happen in email votes.
> Picture this vote on whether or not Dany will win the Iron Throne:
> LNC - Y
> LNC - Y
> LNC - Y
> LNC - Y
> LNC ____
> AK - N
> CA - N
> CO - N
> FL -N
> IL - abstain
> IN - Y
> MI - N
> NH - abstain
> NV - Y
> NY - N
> OH - Y
> PA - Y
> TX - N
> VA - abstain
> WA - N
> 8 yes, 3 abstain, 8 N
> Robson has voted N for CA and Starr has yet to vote. He can choose
> to
> vote as CA and change that vote to a yes causing the yes's to win or
> he
> can vote as LNC primary as no and cause the no's to win. No one
> else
> can do that by picking a different seat. And Mr. Starr has the
> right
> to change which seat he is voting in mid-vote on an email ballot.
> While the Committee has determined there is no disqualification,
> Bylaws, or Rules issues to say there is therefore no issue or no
> confusion is not accurate. If the appointing bodies are okay with
> this, that is their prerogative. I had thought this resolved itself
> when Mr. Miron resigned, but apparently it has not.
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Starchild <[1]starchild at lp.org>
> wrote:
>
> Possibly someone has already discussed this, and if so I
> apologize for not recalling, but what effect could a situation
> like
> this have on things like quorum and voting thresholds?
> It seems to me that one person occupying two seats on a
> committee could potentially make such calculations even more
> confusing than they already can be. Maybe not for those who are
> great at remembering Bylaws and Roberts' Rules and Policy Manual
> provisions and knowing when the basis for a particular calculation
> is the number of representatives present, when it is the number of
> actual bodies present and so on, but for the rest of us.
> Also, if one person occupying two seats simultaneously is
> okay, would one person occupying three seats also be okay?
> Multiple
> individuals occupying multiple seats could really start to eat
> into
> the number of actual people serving on a committee, making it
> effectively smaller than originally intended.
> Regarding the issue Joshua raises, it seems simple to me
> to
> just have a rule (or even just use common sense) that if a person
> is
> already serving on a committee, s/he is ineligible to be appointed
> to that committee. If a person has been appointed by the LNC and
> then a state affiliate decides to appoint them, or vice-versa,
> they
> would still always have the option of resigning their previous
> appointment and accepting the new one.
> Love & Liberty,
> ((( starchild )))
> At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
> [2]RealReform at earthlink.net
> (415) 625-FREE
> @StarchildSF
> On May 17, 2018, at 5:35 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
> wrote:
> > Joshua I thought so too, but a strict reading of the Bylaws
> does
> not
> > say that- I think the intent was to say that (just like I
> think
> the
> > intent is for different people to hold the various seats) but
> it
> does
> > not strictly say that.
> >
> > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Joshua Katz via Lnc-business
>
> > <[1][3]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> >
> > I think it's worth noting that, if this motion were to
> pass,
> the
> > LNC
> > would not get (at least the way I read the bylaws) to
> appoint
> a
> > replacement. The effect would simply be to have fewer
> filled
> > positions
> > on the committee (albeit with the same number of people).
> > On the topic of a bylaw change, I am open to suggestions,
> but
> it
> > is not
> > immediately apparent to me how you'd prevent this
> circumstance.
> > Of
> > course, there's an obvious way, but the effect would be to
> limit
> > state
> > appointments, since the LNC generally appoints first. The
> LNC
> > appointed, if I remember correctly, one alternate to the
> Platform
> > Committee. It could appoint 20, and a bylaw limiting the
> state
> > appointments would mean that the LNC could simply choose 20
> > people and
> > make them ineligible for state appointments. The other way
> to
> do
> > it is
> > to let the states do as they want, but if the states choose
> a
> > person,
> > it bumps that person out of the LNC appointment. That
> prevents
> > LNC
> > mischief, but opens the door to state mischief. If anyone
> has
> an
> > idea
> > that avoids those issues, I'd be happy to hear it, though.
> > Joshua A. Katz
> >
> > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Craig Bowden via
> Lnc-business
>
> > <[1][2][4]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> > Reading through the emails on this issue, I will side with
> > Starchild. Since there are two sides to this, one being
> that
> Mr.
> > Starr has two seats, the other side being that the
> California
> > Alternate is now the Primary, a conflict is in place. If we
> follow
> > with Starchild's motion, I don't see an issue created,
> because
> Mr.
> > Starr would still remain on the committee, while we ensure
> to
> add
> > the clarity that he does only hold one seat.
> > While I certainly understand that no bylaws are violated, I
> don't
> > see this as a measure to punish, but to ensure integrity in
> the
> > process. And while I am sure Mr. Starr is not going to
> abuse
> this,
> > we would have precedent set to make sure that if someone
> did,
> we
> > can
> > make sure action is taken.
> > I would also recommend that we also discuss with the Bylaws
> > Committee about updating our bylaws to make sure that we do
> not
> > end
> > up with a double up situation again, and we will not be
> presented
> > as
> > a body with this issue in the future.
> > My two cents.
> > Craig Bowden
> > Region 1 Alternate
> > On 2018-05-17 10:07, Daniel Hayes via Lnc-business wrote:
> > No. I like to eat the crusts off first.
> > Daniel
> > Sent from my iPhone
> > On May 17, 2018, at 11:07 AM, Wes Benedict via Lnc-business
> >
>
> > <[2][3][5]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> > Want the crusts cut off?
> > Wes Benedict, Executive Director
> > Libertarian National Committee, Inc.
> > 1444 Duke St., Alexandria, VA 22314
> > (202) 333-0008 ext. 232, [3][4][6]wes.benedict at lp.org
> > [4][5][7]facebook.com/libertarians @LPNational
> > Join the Libertarian Party at:
> [5][6][8]http://lp.org/membership
> > On 5/17/2018 12:04 PM, Daniel Hayes via Lnc-business
> wrote:
> > I like fried bologna sandwiches on Bunny brand
> “Plantation”
> > loaf
> > white bread with yellow mustard.
> > Daniel Hayes
> > LNC At Large Member
> > Sent from my iPhone
> > On May 17, 2018, at 10:59 AM, Elizabeth Van Horn via
> > Lnc-business
> >
>
> > <[6][7][9]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> > I didn't say, that you said, rules were broken. Don't
> twist
> my
> > few
> > sentences.
> > ---
> > Elizabeth Van Horn
> > On 2018-05-17 11:50, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> > Please cite for me where I said any rules were broken.
> > Now Ms. Robson is directly affected. Is she the CA
> primary
> > representative or not? It seems to me quite obvious she
> is.
> > That
> > is
> > what I stated on the list. I asked for any disagreement.
> None
> > was
> > offered. Then a few weeks later at the in-person meeting
> I
> was
> > told
> > that is not correct which was news to both myself and to
> Ms.
> > Robson.
> > In line with the prior Committee decision, there is no
> challenge
> > to
> > that from the Committee if that is the position Mr. Starr
> wishes
> > to
> > take. It was agreed by the Committee that this is the
> purview
> > of
> > the
> > appointing bodies. Ergo, my letting the appointing
> bodies
> be
> > aware
> > which is my duty to do so.
> > What I did say is that I was making the appointing bodies
> aware
> > to
> > determine if this is their intent and if they are
> comfortable
> > with
> > the
> > situation. That is all. The Committee already decided
> no
> rules
> > were
> > broken. On that, there is no confusion.
> > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Elizabeth Van Horn
> >
>
> > <[1][7][8][10]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
> > Caryn Ann, I saw your prior email where you told about
> Aaron
> > Starr
> > stating he was still holding both the LNC alternate and
> LPCA
> rep
> > position.
> > It's allowed. No rules were broken. He can do this.
> > What could be done for the future, is a change in the
> bylaws
> to
> > modify
> > how platform committee members are appointed.
> > ---
> > Elizabeth Van Horn
> > On 2018-05-17 11:28, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> > PS I never indicated any confusion in voting for that
> meeting.
> > I
> > said
> > there is a confusion about whether or not Aaron is both
> an
> LNC
> > Primary
> > (no longer an alternate) and the CA Primary.
> > There *could* have been voting confusion if Mr. Starr did
> not
> > agree at
> > the very beginning that he would remain in the LNC seat
> for
> each
> > vote.
> > There was no guarantee that would be the case for the
> future
> > in-person
> > meeting or any email votes.
> > Thus---- the very real issue for the appointing bodies to
> be
> > aware
> > of
> > and decide if that is acceptable to them or not.
> > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos
> >
>
> > <[2][8][9][11]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
> > Elizabeth your email proves there IS a confusion.
> Despite my
> > request
> > to indicate if there was any disagreements with that
> email,
> > at the
> > in-person meeting Mr. Starr then stated he did
> disagree.
> > He stated that Mimi Robson is not the CA
> Representative
> but
> > remains the
> > CA Alternate and that he is BOTH an LNC Primary
> > Representative and
> > the
> > CA representative.
> > So I think it is obvious there is confusion as you
> are
> > confused
> > for
> > good reason.
> > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:18 AM, Elizabeth Van Horn
> via
> > Lnc-business
> >
>
> > <[3][9][10][12]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> > No need for the LNC to withdraw the appointment of
> Aaron
> Starr
> > to
> > the platform committee.
> > Jeffrey Miron, and LNC appointee to the platform
> committee,
> > resigned
> > back in April.
> > This is an exact quote of Caryn Ann's message to the
> platform
> > committee on 4-18-2018. (which can be read in the
> reflector
> > list)
> > ----
> > "Hello Committee, unfortunately Mr. Miron has to resign
> from
> > the
> > committee
> > and extends his apologies.
> > Mr. Starr would now move up to an LNC primary appointee
> and
> > Ms.
> > Robson
> > would move up to the CA primary representative. In
> light
> of
> > the
> > prior
> > issue, please advise immediately if there is a
> disagreement
> > with
> > this prior
> > to my submission of these changes to HQ."
> > ----
> > On the topic of Aaron Starr moving into the LNC
> appointed
> > role,
> > there was no disagreement, by instead ensued discussion
> about
> > alternates in general, including the Florida alternate,
> etc.
> > At the platform committee meeting, which was in
> Columbus,
> Ohio
> > on
> > May 13 & 14, there was no confusion as to what votes,
> or
> > roles,
> > anyone had.
> > Aaron Starr voted as the LNC appointee and Mimi Robson
> voted
> > as
> > the
> > LPCA representative.
> > I was there representing LPIN on the platform
> committee,
> this
> > is
> > how
> > I know.
> > ---
> > Elizabeth Van Horn
> > On 2018-05-17 00:50, Starchild via Lnc-business wrote:
> > I don't think it's acceptable for one person to
> monopolize
> > multiple
> > seats on a committee even if nobody finds it
> confusing
> (a
> > conclusion I
> > question).
> > I brought the situation to the California LP
> Executive
> > Committee's
> > attention in the hopes they would correct it by
> withdrawing
> > their
> > appointment, but they did not. Possibly because it
> was
> by
> > then
> > too late
> > for a state affiliate to make a new appointment.
> That
> being
> > the
> > case, I
> > think we should act to correct the situation on our
> end.
> > I move that the Libertarian National Committee
> withdraw
> its
> > appointment
> > of Aaron Starr to the Platform Committee, and ask
> for
> > seconds.
> > Love & Liberty,
> > ((( starchild
> )))
> > At-Large Representative, Libertarian National
> Committee
> >
>
> >
> [1][4][10][11]RealReform@
>
> > [13]earthlink.net
> > (415) 625-FREE
> > @StarchildSF
> > On May 16, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Alicia Mattson via
> > Lnc-business
> > wrote:
> > Lest any of the readers get the wrong idea:
> > The Platform Committee met this past weekend.
> Mr.
> > Starr
> > wore
> > the hat
> > of an LNC appointee, and Ms. Robson participated
> as
> > the CA
> > alternate.
> > There was no confusion. Two different people
> > participated
> > and
> > voted
> > from the two different appointing bodies, each
> getting
> > one
> > vote
> > on
> > each
> > question.
> > -Alicia
> > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Caryn Ann
> Harlos
> via
> > Lnc-business
> >
>
> > <[1][5][11][12][14]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> > Hello I am writing in my capacity as Platform
> > Committee
> > Chair.
> > As the
> > LNC knows, we appointed Aaron Starr as LNC
> > alternate,
> > and
> > as you
> > may
> > not know, subsequent to that date California
> named
> > Aaron
> > Starr
> > as
> > their
> > primary appointee resulting in him holding
> two
> > seats:
> > LNC
> > Alternate and
> > CA primary.
> > Since that time, LNC appointee Jeffrey Miron
> has
> > resigned
> > leaving
> > a
> > vacancy on the LNC appointments. It seems to
> me
> > that
> > then
> > Mr.
> > Starr
> > would then move into that spot and it seems
> everyone
> > agrees on
> > that,
> > but this results in Mr. Starr in effect
> holding
> two
> > primary
> > appointments, that of LNC and that of
> California.
> > This
> > can
> > affect
> > voting, gives a potential strategic advantage
> to
> Mr.
> > Starr, and
> > leaves
> > the current California alternate unsure if
> she
> is
> > now
> > the
> > primary
> > or
> > not. She has not communicated that to me
> this
> is my
> > own
> > independent
> > observation (she is a difficult position as
> she
> is
> > now
> > the
> > LPCA
> > Chair). Mr. Starr has informed me that he
> has
> not
> > vacated any
> > seat
> > and thus holds the two positions. The
> Committee
> has
> > decided
> > that
> > there
> > is nothing in RONR or our Bylaws that
> prevents
> this
> > situation.
> > At this point, it is in the purview of the
> > appointing
> > bodies
> > (the
> > LNC
> > and California) to decide if they wish to
> ask,
> > require
> > a
> > choice,
> > leave
> > things be, or some other option available to
> them.
> > I
> > am
> > cc'ing
> > this
> > information to the California Chair Ms.
> Robson
> to
> > forward
> > to her
> > EC if
> > she wishes.
> > If there is any change please let me know.
> > --
> > In Liberty,
> > Caryn Ann Harlos
> > Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National
> > Committee
> > (Alaska,
> > Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana,
> Utah,
> > Wyoming,
> > Washington)
> > - [1]Caryn.Ann. [2]Harlos at LP.org
> > Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
> > Chair, Libertarian National Party Platform
> Committee
> > Member, Libertarian National Party Bylaws
> Committee
> > A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> > We defend your rights
> > And oppose the use of force
> > Taxation is theft
> > References
> > 1. mailto:[2]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > References
> >
>
> > 1. [3]mailto:[6][12][13][15]lnc-
> business at hq.lp.org
> > 2. [4]mailto:[7]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > References
> > 1.
> mailto:[8][13][14][16]RealReform at earthlink.net
> > 2. mailto:[9]Harlos at LP.org
> > 3. mailto:[10][14][15][17]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
> >
> > 4. mailto:[11]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > --
> > --
> > In Liberty,
> > Caryn Ann Harlos
> > Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee
> (Alaska,
> > Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah,
> Wyoming,
> > Washington)
> > - [12]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
> > Communications Director, [13]Libertarian Party of
> Colorado
> > Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
> > A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> > We defend your rights
> > And oppose the use of force
> > Taxation is theft
> > --
> > --
> > In Liberty,
> > Caryn Ann Harlos
> > Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee
> (Alaska,
> > Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah,
> Wyoming,
> > Washington)
> > - [14]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
> > Communications Director, [15]Libertarian Party of
> Colorado
> > Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
> > A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> > We defend your rights
> > And oppose the use of force
> > Taxation is theft
> > --
> > --
> > In Liberty,
> > Caryn Ann Harlos
> > Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee
> (Alaska,
> > Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah,
> Wyoming,
> > Washington)
> > - [16]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
> > Communications Director, [17]Libertarian Party of
> Colorado
> > Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
> > A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> > We defend your rights
> > And oppose the use of force
> > Taxation is theft
> > References
> >
>
> > 1. mailto:[15][16][18]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> > 2. mailto:[16][17][19]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> > 3. mailto:[17][18][20]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 4. mailto:[18][19][21]RealReform at earthlink.net
> > 5. mailto:[19][20][22]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 6. mailto:[20][21][23]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 7. mailto:[21]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 8. mailto:[22][22][24]RealReform at earthlink.net
> > 9. mailto:[23]Harlos at LP.org
> > 10. mailto:[24][23][25]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 11. mailto:[25]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 12. mailto:[26]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 13. [27][24][26]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> > 14. mailto:[28]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 15. [29][25][27]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> > 16. mailto:[30]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 17. [31][26][28]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> > References
> > 1. mailto:[27][29]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 2. mailto:[28][30]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 3. mailto:[29][31]wes.benedict at lp.org
> > 4. [30][32]http://facebook.com/libertarians
> > 5. [31][33]http://lp.org/membership
> > 6. mailto:[32][34]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 7. mailto:[33][35]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> > 8. mailto:[34][36]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> > 9. mailto:[35][37]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 10. mailto:[36][38]RealReform at earthlink.net
> > 11. mailto:[37][39]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 12. mailto:[38][40]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 13. mailto:[39][41]RealReform at earthlink.net
> > 14. mailto:[40][42]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 15. mailto:[41][43]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> > 16. mailto:[42][44]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> > 17. mailto:[43][45]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 18. mailto:[44][46]RealReform at earthlink.net
> > 19. mailto:[45][47]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 20. mailto:[46][48]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 21. mailto:[47]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 22. mailto:[48][49]RealReform at earthlink.net
> > 23. mailto:[49]Harlos at LP.org
> > 24. mailto:[50][50]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 25. mailto:[51]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 26. mailto:[52]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 27. [53][51]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> > 28. mailto:[54]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 29. [55][52]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> > 30. mailto:[56]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 31. [57][53]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> >
> > --
> > --
> > In Liberty,
> > Caryn Ann Harlos
> > Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee
> (Alaska,
> > Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
> Washington)
> > - [58]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
> > Communications Director, [59]Libertarian Party of Colorado
> > Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
> > A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> > We defend your rights
> > And oppose the use of force
> > Taxation is theft
> >
> > References
> >
> > 1. mailto:[54]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 2. mailto:[55]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 3. mailto:[56]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 4. mailto:[57]wes.benedict at lp.org
> > 5. [58]http://facebook.com/libertarians
> > 6. [59]http://lp.org/membership
> > 7. mailto:[60]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 8. mailto:[61]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> > 9. mailto:[62]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> > 10. mailto:[63]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 11. mailto:[64]RealReform at earthlink.net
> > 12. mailto:[65]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 13. mailto:[66]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 14. mailto:[67]RealReform at earthlink.net
> > 15. mailto:[68]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 16. mailto:[69]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> > 17. mailto:[70]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> > 18. mailto:[71]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 19. mailto:[72]RealReform at earthlink.net
> > 20. mailto:[73]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 21. mailto:[74]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 22. mailto:[75]RealReform at earthlink.net
> > 23. mailto:[76]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 24. [77]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> > 25. [78]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> > 26. [79]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> > 27. mailto:[80]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 28. mailto:[81]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 29. mailto:[82]wes.benedict at lp.org
> > 30. [83]http://facebook.com/libertarians
> > 31. [84]http://lp.org/membership
> > 32. mailto:[85]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 33. mailto:[86]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> > 34. mailto:[87]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> > 35. mailto:[88]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 36. mailto:[89]RealReform at earthlink.net
> > 37. mailto:[90]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 38. mailto:[91]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 39. mailto:[92]RealReform at earthlink.net
> > 40. mailto:[93]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 41. mailto:[94]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> > 42. mailto:[95]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> > 43. mailto:[96]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 44. mailto:[97]RealReform at earthlink.net
> > 45. mailto:[98]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 46. mailto:[99]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 47. mailto:[100]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 48. mailto:[101]RealReform at earthlink.net
> > 49. mailto:[102]Harlos at LP.org
> > 50. mailto:[103]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 51. mailto:[104]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 52. mailto:[105]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 53. [106]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> > 54. mailto:[107]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 55. [108]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> > 56. mailto:[109]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 57. [110]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> > 58. mailto:[111]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 59. [112]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>
> --
> --
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
> Washington)
> - [113]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
> Communications Director, [114]Libertarian Party of Colorado
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> We defend your rights
> And oppose the use of force
> Taxation is theft
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:starchild at lp.org
> 2. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
> 3. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 4. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 5. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 6. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 7. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 8. http://lp.org/membership
> 9. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 10. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 11. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 12. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 13. http://earthlink.net/
> 14. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 15. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 16. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
> 17. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 18. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 19. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 20. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 21. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
> 22. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 23. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 24. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
> 25. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 26. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 27. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 28. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 29. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 30. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 31. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 32. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 33. http://lp.org/membership
> 34. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 35. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 36. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 37. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 38. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
> 39. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 40. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 41. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
> 42. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 43. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 44. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 45. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 46. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
> 47. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 48. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 49. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
> 50. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 51. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 52. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 53. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 54. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 55. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 56. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 57. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 58. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 59. http://lp.org/membership
> 60. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 61. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 62. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 63. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 64. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
> 65. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 66. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 67. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
> 68. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 69. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 70. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 71. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 72. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
> 73. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 74. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 75. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
> 76. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 77. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 78. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 79. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 80. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 81. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 82. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> 83. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> 84. http://lp.org/membership
> 85. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 86. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 87. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 88. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 89. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
> 90. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 91. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 92. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
> 93. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 94. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 95. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 96. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 97. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
> 98. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 99. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 100. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 101. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
> 102. mailto:Harlos at LP.org
> 103. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 104. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 105. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 106. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 107. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 108. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 109. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 110. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 111. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 112. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 113. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 114. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list