[Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2018-11: ACKNOWLEDGE ELECTION OF JC
Richard Longstreth
richard.longstreth at lp.org
Wed Jul 11 07:15:22 EDT 2018
I would remind the committee that according to our bylaws, nobody was
actually elected by the delegates according to the procedures laid out. The
LNC rubber stamping a plurality vote does violate the bylaws. The LNC
asking delegates to revote does not. Is mail the best way? Perhaps not, but
are there any other ideas that don't make us look like we are appointing
our own judges in case there is a trial (metaphorically)?
RTL
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018, 22:08 Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> Agree, and will also be withdrawing from the email debate.
>
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
>
>
> On 2018-07-11 00:11, john.phillips--- via Lnc-business wrote:
> > That is exactly what I have been doing, polling my region, discussing
> > their points and even helping provide the arguments against made by
> > others, and telling them that in this matter if they wanted me to
> > change my vote I absolutely would.
> > So far the response is unanimously in favor of this motion, with the
> > only corollary being that we get it done then fix the broken system.
> > Which several have volunteered to serve on committees to help with.
> > Now unless the people in my region swamp me with requests to change
> > my
> > vote, I will be withdrawing myself from this pointless retreading of
> > the same arguments. I have better things to do, like discuss actual
> > fixes so the clusterf*** does not happen again.
> > John Phillips
> > Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
> > Cell [1]217-412-5973
> >
> > ------ Original message------
> > From: Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business
> > Date: Tue, Jul 10, 2018 10:14 PM
> > To: [2]lnc-business at hq.lp.org;
> > Cc: Elizabeth Van Horn;
> > Subject:Re: [Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2018-11: ACKNOWLEDGE
> > ELECTION
> > OF JC
> > I'd like to remind new members to listen to your constituency. If
> > you're
> > a Region Rep, that means your regional members, state affiliate
> > officers, etc. For At-Large, that means *all* the LP members are your
> > constituency, so a broad spectrum feedback might give you information
> > on
> > what the LP body wishes.
> >
> > Also, I'll say that some of the feedback I'm getting from Region 3 says
> > that they'd be fine with *no* Judicial Committee. This feedback came
> > from a State Chair and a State VC, in Region 3, and officers of two
> > other state affiliates in the region. The 'no Judicial Committee"
> > option, means we just don't have a JC, and then in 2020, during a
> > regular convention, the delegate body elects a new Judicial Committee.
> >
> > NO ONE has suggested that the LNC conduct a mail ballot of the former
> > delegates at the convention, and I'd also be against that method, as
> > that *would* be the LNC trying to orchestrate an outcome, as we already
> > had a delegate vote regarding the JC. That would be the LNC
> > disregarding the delegate body and votes that we all saw happen at
> > convention. The way to respect the delegate body, is to either approve
> > the top seven JC candidates, or have no JC until the 2020 convention
> > can
> > elect that committee. The former would be giving voice to the delegate
> > body, and the latter would also be giving voice, while recognizing that
> > the delegate voting procedure didn't finalize a committee.
> >
> > ---
> > Elizabeth Van Horn
> > LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
> > Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
> > LP Social Media Process Review Committee
> > Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
> > [3]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
> >
> >
> > On [4]2018-07-10 20:21, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
> >> And I remind everyone, particularly the new members, this is
> >> ultimately
> >> a parliamentary question not a popularity one. And I urge you to
> >> avail
> >> yourselves of the opportunity to speak with the convention
> >> parliamentarian on this issue.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 6:19 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
> >> <[1[5]]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thank you for considering my points Richard. I am coming at this
> >> also
> >> from a keen awareness of how awry things like this can go. One
> >> small
> >> well-intentioned expediency on the part the LNC can turn into a
> >> depth
> >> charge that lasts for a decade.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 3:18 PM, Richard Longstreth via
> >> Lnc-business
> >> <[2[6]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> I am changing Region 1's vote to abstain.
> >> I am continuing to think on this and hear back from more in my
> >> region
> >> before finalizing my decision. I am leaning toward voting no
> >> at
> >> this
> >> point but will cast a final ballot on Saturday with
> >> explanation
> >> (our
> >> deadline). Please continue discussion as all points are
> >> relevant.
> >> RTL
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018, 11:55 William Redpath via Lnc-business
> >> <[1][3[7]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> >> I vote Yes. Bill Redpath
> >> On [8]2018-07-09 13:47, [9]joshua.smith--- via Lnc-business
> >> wrote:
> >> > I vote yes. Given that the delegates were given the choice
> >> at
> >> > convention just a few short days ago, I believe we should
> >> respect
> >> that
> >> > decision.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Joshua D. Smith
> >> >
> >> > On [10]2018-07-07 22:23, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
> >> wrote:
> >> >> We have an electronic mail ballot. Votes are due to the
> >> LNC-Business
> >> >> list by July 14, 2018 at 11:59:59pm Pacific time.
> >> Co-Sponsors:
> >> >> Bishop-Henchman, Goldstein, Hagan, Merced, Van Horn
> >> Motion:
> >> Move
> >> >> that
> >> >> the Libertarian National Committee acknowledge the
> >> election
> >> of
> >> the
> >> >> following to the Judicial Committee for a four-year
> >> term:
> >> D.
> >> Frank
> >> >> Robinson, Chuck Moulton, Darryl Perry, Ruth Bennett,
> >> Geoff
> >> Neale,
> >> >> Jim
> >> >> Turney, and Tricia Sprankle. You can keep track of the
> >> Secretary's
> >> >> manual tally of votes here:
> >>
> >> [1][2][4][11]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> >> >> --
> >> >> --
> >> >> In Liberty,
> >> >> Caryn Ann Harlos
> >> >> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National
> >> Committee
> >> (Alaska,
> >> >> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah,
> >> Wyoming,
> >> >> Washington)
> >> >> - [2][12]Caryn.Ann.[13] Harlos at LP.org
> >> >> Communications Director, [3]Libertarian Party of
> >> Colorado
> >> >> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
> >> >> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> >> >> We defend your rights
> >> >> And oppose the use of force
> >> >> Taxation is theft
> >> >>
> >> >> References
> >> >>
> >> >> 1. [3][5][14]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> >> >> 2. mailto:[4[15]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >> >> 3. [5][6][16]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> >> References
> >> 1. mailto:[7[17]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >> 2. [8][18]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> >>
> >> 3. [9][19]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> >> 4. mailto:[10[20]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >> 5. [11][21]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> >>
> >> --
> >> --
> >> In Liberty,
> >> Caryn Ann Harlos
> >> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
> >> - [12][22]Caryn.Ann.[23] Harlos at LP.org or[24] Secretary at LP.org.
> >> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[25] LPedia at LP.org
> >> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> >> We defend your rights
> >> And oppose the use of force
> >> Taxation is theft
> >>
> >> --
> >> --
> >> In Liberty,
> >> Caryn Ann Harlos
> >> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
> >> - [13][26]Caryn.Ann.[27] Harlos at LP.org or[28] Secretary at LP.org.
> >> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[29] LPedia at LP.org
> >> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> >> We defend your rights
> >> And oppose the use of force
> >> Taxation is theft
> >>
> >> References
> >>
> >> 1. mailto[30]:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> >> 2. mailto[31]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >> 3. mailto[32]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >> 4. [33]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> >> 5. [34]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> >> 6. [35]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> >> 7. mailto[36]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >> 8. [37]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> >> 9. [38]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> >> 10. mailto[39]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >> 11. [40]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> >> 12. mailto[41]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >> 13. mailto[42]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >
> > References
> >
> > 1. tel:217-412-5973
> > 2. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 3. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
> > 4. tel:2018-07-10 20
> > 5. mailto:]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> > 6. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 7. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 8. tel:2018-07-09 13
> > 9. http://joshua.sm/
> > 10. tel:2018-07-07 22
> > 11. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> > 12. http://Caryn.An/
> > 13. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> > 14. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> > 15. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 16. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> > 17. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 18. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> > 19. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> > 20. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 21. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> > 22. http://Caryn.An/
> > 23. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> > 24. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> > 25. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> > 26. http://Caryn.An/
> > 27. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> > 28. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> > 29. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> > 30. mailto::caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> > 31. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 32. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 33. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> > 34. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> > 35. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> > 36. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 37. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> > 38. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> > 39. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 40. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> > 41. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > 42. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
I would remind the committee that according to our bylaws, nobody was
actually elected by the delegates according to the procedures laid out.
The LNC rubber stamping a plurality vote does violate the bylaws. The
LNC asking delegates to revote does not. Is mail the best way? Perhaps
not, but are there any other ideas that don't make us look like we are
appointing our own judges in case there is a trial (metaphorically)?
RTL
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018, 22:08 Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business
<[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
Agree, and will also be withdrawing from the email debate.
---
Elizabeth Van Horn
On 2018-07-11 00:11, john.phillips--- via Lnc-business wrote:
> That is exactly what I have been doing, polling my region,
discussing
> their points and even helping provide the arguments against
made by
> others, and telling them that in this matter if they wanted me
to
> change my vote I absolutely would.
> So far the response is unanimously in favor of this motion,
with the
> only corollary being that we get it done then fix the broken
system.
> Which several have volunteered to serve on committees to help
with.
> Now unless the people in my region swamp me with requests to
change
> my
> vote, I will be withdrawing myself from this pointless
retreading of
> the same arguments. I have better things to do, like discuss
actual
> fixes so the clusterf*** does not happen again.
> John Phillips
> Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
> Cell [1]217-412-5973
>
> ------ Original message------
> From: Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business
> Date: Tue, Jul 10, 2018 10:14 PM
> To: [2][2]lnc-business at hq.lp.org;
> Cc: Elizabeth Van Horn;
> Subject:Re: [Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2018-11: ACKNOWLEDGE
> ELECTION
> OF JC
> I'd like to remind new members to listen to your constituency. If
> you're
> a Region Rep, that means your regional members, state affiliate
> officers, etc. For At-Large, that means *all* the LP members are
your
> constituency, so a broad spectrum feedback might give you
information
> on
> what the LP body wishes.
>
> Also, I'll say that some of the feedback I'm getting from Region 3
says
> that they'd be fine with *no* Judicial Committee. This feedback
came
> from a State Chair and a State VC, in Region 3, and officers of
two
> other state affiliates in the region. The 'no Judicial Committee"
> option, means we just don't have a JC, and then in 2020, during a
> regular convention, the delegate body elects a new Judicial
Committee.
>
> NO ONE has suggested that the LNC conduct a mail ballot of the
former
> delegates at the convention, and I'd also be against that method,
as
> that *would* be the LNC trying to orchestrate an outcome, as we
already
> had a delegate vote regarding the JC. That would be the LNC
> disregarding the delegate body and votes that we all saw happen at
> convention. The way to respect the delegate body, is to either
approve
> the top seven JC candidates, or have no JC until the 2020
convention
> can
> elect that committee. The former would be giving voice to the
delegate
> body, and the latter would also be giving voice, while recognizing
that
> the delegate voting procedure didn't finalize a committee.
>
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
> LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
> Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
> LP Social Media Process Review Committee
> Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
> [3][3]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
>
>
> On [4]2018-07-10 20:21, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>> And I remind everyone, particularly the new members, this is
>> ultimately
>> a parliamentary question not a popularity one. And I urge you
to
>> avail
>> yourselves of the opportunity to speak with the convention
>> parliamentarian on this issue.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 6:19 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
>> <[1[5]][4]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for considering my points Richard. I am coming at
this
>> also
>> from a keen awareness of how awry things like this can go.
One
>> small
>> well-intentioned expediency on the part the LNC can turn into
a
>> depth
>> charge that lasts for a decade.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 3:18 PM, Richard Longstreth via
>> Lnc-business
>> <[2[6]][5]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>
>> I am changing Region 1's vote to abstain.
>> I am continuing to think on this and hear back from more
in my
>> region
>> before finalizing my decision. I am leaning toward voting
no
>> at
>> this
>> point but will cast a final ballot on Saturday with
>> explanation
>> (our
>> deadline). Please continue discussion as all points are
>> relevant.
>> RTL
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018, 11:55 William Redpath via
Lnc-business
>> <[1][3[7]][6]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>> I vote Yes. Bill Redpath
>> On [8]2018-07-09 13:47, [9]joshua.smith--- via
Lnc-business
>> wrote:
>> > I vote yes. Given that the delegates were given the
choice
>> at
>> > convention just a few short days ago, I believe we
should
>> respect
>> that
>> > decision.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Joshua D. Smith
>> >
>> > On [10]2018-07-07 22:23, Caryn Ann Harlos via
Lnc-business
>> wrote:
>> >> We have an electronic mail ballot. Votes are due to
the
>> LNC-Business
>> >> list by July 14, 2018 at 11:59:59pm Pacific time.
>> Co-Sponsors:
>> >> Bishop-Henchman, Goldstein, Hagan, Merced, Van Horn
>> Motion:
>> Move
>> >> that
>> >> the Libertarian National Committee acknowledge the
>> election
>> of
>> the
>> >> following to the Judicial Committee for a four-year
>> term:
>> D.
>> Frank
>> >> Robinson, Chuck Moulton, Darryl Perry, Ruth
Bennett,
>> Geoff
>> Neale,
>> >> Jim
>> >> Turney, and Tricia Sprankle. You can keep track of
the
>> Secretary's
>> >> manual tally of votes here:
>>
>> [1][2][4][11][7]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> >> --
>> >> --
>> >> In Liberty,
>> >> Caryn Ann Harlos
>> >> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National
>> Committee
>> (Alaska,
>> >> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah,
>> Wyoming,
>> >> Washington)
>> >> - [2][12]Caryn.Ann.[13] Harlos at LP.org
>> >> Communications Director, [3]Libertarian Party of
>> Colorado
>> >> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>> >> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>> >> We defend your rights
>> >> And oppose the use of force
>> >> Taxation is theft
>> >>
>> >> References
>> >>
>> >> 1. [3][5][14][8]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> >> 2. mailto:[4[15]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> >> 3. [5][6][16][9]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> References
>> 1. mailto:[7[17]][10]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 2. [8][18][11]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>
>> 3. [9][19][12]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 4. mailto:[10[20]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 5. [11][21][13]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>
>> --
>> --
>> In Liberty,
>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
>> - [12][22]Caryn.Ann.[23] Harlos at LP.org or[24]
Secretary at LP.org.
>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[25]
LPedia at LP.org
>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>> We defend your rights
>> And oppose the use of force
>> Taxation is theft
>>
>> --
>> --
>> In Liberty,
>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
>> - [13][26]Caryn.Ann.[27] Harlos at LP.org or[28]
Secretary at LP.org.
>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[29]
LPedia at LP.org
>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>> We defend your rights
>> And oppose the use of force
>> Taxation is theft
>>
>> References
>>
>> 1. mailto[30]:[14]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>> 2. mailto[31]:[15]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 3. mailto[32]:[16]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 4. [33][17]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 5. [34][18]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 6. [35][19]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 7. mailto[36]:[20]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 8. [37][21]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 9. [38][22]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 10. mailto[39]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 11. [40][23]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 12. mailto[41]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 13. mailto[42]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>
> References
>
> 1. tel:217-412-5973
> 2. mailto:[24]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 3. [25]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
> 4. tel:2018-07-10 20
> 5. mailto:][26]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 6. mailto:][27]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 7. mailto:][28]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 8. tel:2018-07-09 13
> 9. [29]http://joshua.sm/
> 10. tel:2018-07-07 22
> 11. [30]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 12. [31]http://Caryn.An/
> 13. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> 14. [32]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 15. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 16. [33]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 17. mailto:][34]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 18. [35]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 19. [36]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 20. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 21. [37]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 22. [38]http://Caryn.An/
> 23. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> 24. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> 25. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> 26. [39]http://Caryn.An/
> 27. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> 28. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> 29. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> 30. mailto::[40]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 31. mailto::[41]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 32. mailto::[42]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 33. [43]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 34. [44]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 35. [45]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 36. mailto::[46]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 37. [47]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 38. [48]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 39. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 40. [49]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 41. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 42. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
References
1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
2. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
3. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
4. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
5. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
6. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
7. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
8. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
9. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
10. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
11. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
12. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
13. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
14. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
15. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
16. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
17. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
18. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
19. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
20. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
21. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
22. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
23. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
24. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
25. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
26. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
27. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
28. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
29. http://joshua.sm/
30. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
31. http://Caryn.An/
32. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
33. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
34. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
35. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
36. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
37. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
38. http://Caryn.An/
39. http://Caryn.An/
40. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
41. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
42. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
43. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
44. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
45. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
46. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
47. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
48. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
49. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list