[Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2018-22: PROPERTY RIGHTS RESOLUTION

Caryn Ann Harlos caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
Wed Aug 15 18:07:26 EDT 2018


I find the same things tedious.  It is activism one-upmanship and having
classes of activism.  The guy who has never knocked on a door or given to a
candidate but toils in other ways is not “lesser” but rhetoric can give
that impression.

And the focus on simple monetary amounts can shame those who don’t have
that kind of resource.

The numbers thrown around here are a HUGE amount to some people.  Literally
the difference between food and housing and none.

-Caryn Ann


On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:49 PM Susan Hogarth via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

>    I take it as a given that we are all working hard. I find these “let’s
>    focus on real business” critiques tedious.
>
>    I do think we need to worry about a *perception* that we are allotting
>    too much time to posturing, though.
>
>    Susan Jane Hogarth
>
>    Region 5 Alternate
>
>    [1]919-906-2106
>
>    On Aug 15, 2018 at 5:39 PM, <[2]Caryn Ann Harlos> wrote:
>
>    My point was that I know for a fact of candidate assistance he is
>    doing.
>    -Caryn Ann
>    On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM Susan Hogarth via Lnc-business
>    <[3]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
>         I took a quick look at Smith’s fb page and it is indeed almost
>      all
>         about this.
>         Most disturbing in light of all the this-is-not-a-purge talk is
>      his
>         featuring of this clearly pro-purge fanmail:
>         [cid:6F811495-0D5B-4C23-AE16-0AFC39078BD6]
>         Susan Jane Hogarth
>         Region 5 Alternate
>         [1]919-906-2106
>         On Aug 15, 2018 at 5:14 PM, <[2]Caryn Ann Harlos via
>      Lnc-business>
>         wrote:
>         I do a weekly fundraising drive for a candidate each week.
>         If you are going to go to the trouble of counting emails, it
>      would be
>         nice if you went to the trouble of finding out things that don’t
>      fit
>         your narrative.  You could also do the same for Joshua.  He can
>      speak
>         to his own activities but I know for a fact that you caricature
>      of him
>         as only caring about this is woefully incorrect.
>         By the time my promo schedule is done I will have raised as
>      much.  We
>         shouldn’t have to highlight our own candidacy efforts by putting
>      other
>         people’s efforts down.  That is a real issue in this Party.
>         -Caryn Ann
>         On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:02 PM Joe Bishop-Henchman via
>      Lnc-business
>         <[1][4]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>           I vote no.
>           I oppose socialism, support property rights, and think
>      syndicalists
>           (to
>           use a more precise term for them) are naive, wrong, and
>      internally
>           inconsistent. If one of their tiny number is a candidate for
>      office
>           in
>           Michigan, I think it's fair if Michigan sought to expel them or
>           remove
>           them from the ballot. If one of them in a position of LNC
>      authority
>           espouses views advocating violence or destruction of individual
>           rights,
>           I think it's fair to consider censure or removal.
>           Neither is the case here. This resolution either reaffirms our
>           platform
>           - using some odd language that throws Georgists and mutualists
>      under
>           the
>           bus too - or it expands our platform and turns the LNC into a
>      purity
>           police of Libertarian beliefs.
>           Mr. Olsen mentioned real instances of people hesitant about
>      joining
>           the
>           party because of the rise of these syndicalists. That gives me
>           pause. If
>           I were talking to such a person, I'd point out our platform as
>      it
>           stands
>           and let them know that the weirdo socialists couldn't even fill
>      one
>           Uber, let alone pose any threat to our party. Would such a
>      person be
>           more reassured by a "reaffirmed" Platform than the current
>      Platform?
>           Are
>           our SoP and Platform so weak that this group has managed to
>      shake
>           the
>           foundations of our Party?
>           I encounter people all the time who aren't sure what the
>      Libertarian
>           Party stand for because of our various strains of thought and
>      our
>           inability to focus on electing candidates. A non-binding
>      resolution
>           doesn't fix that. It actually makes it worse - signalling that
>      we
>           the
>           LNC can't keep our eye on electing candidates, or at least on
>           promoting
>           Libertarian solutions to the problems of the day.
>           In the four days, Ms. Harlos has written and sent 68 emails on
>      this
>           matter and Mr. Smith has posted 20 Facebook posts on this
>      matter.
>           They've decided this is their number one issue and want it to
>      be the
>           LNC's number one issue.
>           If we're looking to demonstrate Libertarian relevance to
>      voters, I
>           would
>           instead suggest one of the following could be our top item for
>           discussion, action, or marketing this week:
>           *China announces 25% tariffs on $60 billion worth of U.S.
>      goods, in
>           response to President Trump considering higher tariffs on $200
>           billion
>           worth of Chinese goods. The total negative effect of enacted
>      and
>           announced tariffs in this tariff war is 465,000 lost jobs and
>      $150
>           billion less in economic growth.
>           *The U.S. Senate is poised to approve H.R. 6157, which
>      increases
>           Pentagon spending to $675 billion for this upcoming year. While
>           federal
>           spending is being boosted, the U.S. Treasury is expected to
>      borrow
>           $955
>           billion this year, up from $519 billion last year.
>           *$1.7 billion was spent on lobbying in Washington, DC in the
>      first
>           six
>           months of this year, the highest since 2010. There are 9,785
>           registered
>           lobbyists in the nation's capital, or 18 for each member of
>           Congress.
>           *Electric power was restored to the entire island of Puerto
>      Rico
>           today
>           for the first time since Hurricane Maria hit 328 days ago, a
>      woeful
>           testament to the commonwealth's dependence on the federal
>           government.
>           *Wildfires continue to devastate northern California,
>      destroying
>           thousands of homes and claiming 31 lives. Regulations prohibit
>           timber
>           companies from clearing out dense forests and removing an
>      estimated
>           129
>           million dead trees, leaving a tinder box.
>           *50 schoolchildren on a field trip were killed and 80 were
>      wounded
>           in a
>           Saudi airstrike in northern Yemen that hit their bus last
>      Thursday.
>           The
>           victims were age 6 to 11. U.S. Secretary of State Pompeo, on
>      the
>           phone
>           with the Saudi Crown Prince a few days later, thanked the
>      Saudis for
>           their help in Syria and Iraq.
>           *President Trump revoked the security clearance of one official
>      who
>           has
>           spoken out against him, and fired an FBI official who spoke out
>           against
>           him.
>           *California's Supreme Court struck down San Diego's decision
>           (approved
>           by 65% of voters) to put city employees into a 401k retirement
>      plan
>           instead of an antiquated and costly defined benefit pension
>      plan. In
>           DC,
>           the WMATA transit agency lost a similar arbitration dispute.
>           Taxpayers
>           will have to pick up the tab in both instances.
>           *Socialist Venezuela today defaulted on another $1.125 billion
>      in
>           bonds.
>           Several dozen opposition figures have been rounded up for
>           "questioning"
>           following a drone assassination attempt on Maduro earlier this
>           month.
>           *New Zealand banned foreigners from buying property as a way of
>           "solving" high housing prices. U.S. cities may look at the idea
>           next.
>           *North Dakota will vote on marijuana legalization, after LP
>      activist
>           Dave Owen and his org LegalizeND got the issue on the ballot
>      this
>           week.
>           *And of course, our many great candidates who need donations,
>           volunteers, and attention as they work to be elected and
>      re-elected.
>           Imagine how much money we could raise for them or activists we
>      could
>           get
>           for them if we were e-mailing 68 times or posting 20 Facebook
>      posts
>           about them instead?
>           Relating to the last point, over the next few days I'm going to
>           personally donate $68 each - one for each of Ms. Harlos's
>      emails
>           about
>           socialist entryism in the last four days - to ten LP candidates
>      in
>           winnable or ballot-access-important races across the country,
>      and
>           publicizing it to my network to encourage others to give as
>      well. If
>           all
>           27 of us were to do the same, that's an injection of $18,360
>      and a
>           clear
>           demonstration that this LNC has its priorities in order. If all
>      27
>           of us
>           were to get our networks to do the same, that may make the
>           difference
>           between winning and not winning. I welcome anyone joining me in
>      this
>           pledge, regardless of how they vote on this resolution.
>           JBH
>           ------------
>           Joe Bishop-Henchman
>           LNC Member (At-Large)
>           [2][5]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>           [3][6]www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>           On 2018-08-15 05:56, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>           > We have an electronic mail ballot.
>           >
>           >    Votes are due to the LNC-Business list by July 22, 2018 at
>           > 11:59:59pm
>           >    Pacific time.
>           >
>           >    Co-Sponsors:  Caryn Ann Harlos, Richard Longstreth, Steven
>           Nekhaila,
>           >    Justin O’Donnell, Joshua Smith
>           >
>           >    Motion: Move to adopt the following resolution:
>           >
>           >    WHEREAS, the Libertarian Party supports the free market
>      and
>           > therefore
>           >    the right of privatization of property as an extension of
>      the
>           >    individual;
>           >
>           >    WHEREAS, the Statement of Principles of The Libertarian
>      Party
>           >    explicitly supports the right to private property
>      ownership,
>           > including
>           >    the right to do business utilizing that property as
>      capital;
>           >
>           >    WHEREAS, the Libertarian Party strongly supports the
>      rights of
>           >    individuals to own private property including land,
>      structures,
>           > natural
>           >    resources and other private space through homesteading,
>           purchase,
>           > and
>           >    other lawful libertarian means;
>           >
>           >    WHEREAS, ownership of private property, including but not
>           limited to
>           >    land and housing, does not require continual or personal
>      use to
>           > exist
>           >    as justly owned property unless otherwise abandoned;
>           >
>           >    WHEREAS, these have been part of the principles of the
>           Libertarian
>           >    Party since its inception;
>           >
>           >    THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that socialist and communist
>           property
>           >    ownership schemes, including the collectivization of
>      property,
>           > unlawful
>           >    usurpation of property, and incorrect characterizations of
>           private
>           >    property, unless otherwise voluntarily agreed by all
>      parties,
>           are
>           >    incompatible with the philosophy of the Libertarian Party.
>           >
>           >    =============================================
>           >
>           >    Important Bylaws note:
>           >
>           >    Resolutions require passage by 3/4 vote as follows:
>           >
>           >    Article 7:
>           >
>           >    ***
>           >
>           >    The National Committee may adopt public policy resolutions
>      by a
>           ¾
>           > vote
>           >    with previous notice or by unanimous consent without
>      previous
>           > notice.
>           >
>           >    =============================================
>           >
>           >    You can keep track of the Secretary's manual tally of
>      votes
>           here:
>           >    [1][4][7]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting.  Votes are noted
>      with a
>           link to
>           > the
>           >    actual ballot cast for verification. You can find the time
>      that
>           the
>           >    manual tally was last updated at the bottom of the sheet.
>           >
>           >    Please notify me of any discrepancies.
>           >    --
>           >    In Liberty,
>           >    Caryn Ann Harlos
>           >    Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
>      Secretary
>           -
>           >    [2]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>           >    Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>      LPedia at LP.org
>           >    A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>           >    We defend your rights
>           >    And oppose the use of force
>           >    Taxation is theft
>           >
>           > References
>           >
>           >    1. [5][8]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>           >    2. mailto:[6]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>         --
>         --
>         In Liberty,
>         Caryn Ann Harlos
>         Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
>         - [7]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>         Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
>         A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>         We defend your rights
>         And oppose the use of force
>         Taxation is theft
>      References
>         1. mailto:[9]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>         2. mailto:[10]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>         3. [11]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>         4. [12]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>         5. [13]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>         6. mailto:[14]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>         7. mailto:[15]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>      References
>         1. tel:919-906-2106
>         2. mailto:[16]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
>    --
>    --
>    In Liberty,
>    Caryn Ann Harlos
>    Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
>    - [17]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>    Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
>    A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>    We defend your rights
>    And oppose the use of force
>    Taxation is theft
>
> References
>
>    1. tel:919-906-2106
>    2. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>    3. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>    4. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>    5. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>    6. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>    7. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>    8. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>    9. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   10. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>   11. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>   12. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>   13. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>   14. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>   15. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>   16. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   17. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>
-- 
-- 
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org> or Secretary at LP.org.
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org

A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
*We defend your rights*
*And oppose the use of force*
*Taxation is theft*
-------------- next part --------------
   I find the same things tedious.  It is activism one-upmanship and
   having classes of activism.  The guy who has never knocked on a door or
   given to a candidate but toils in other ways is not “lesser” but
   rhetoric can give that impression.

   And the focus on simple monetary amounts can shame those who don’t have
   that kind of resource.



   The numbers thrown around here are a HUGE amount to some people.
   Literally the difference between food and housing and none.

   -Caryn Ann

   On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:49 PM Susan Hogarth via Lnc-business
   <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

        I take it as a given that we are all working hard. I find these
     “let’s
        focus on real business” critiques tedious.
        I do think we need to worry about a *perception* that we are
     allotting
        too much time to posturing, though.
        Susan Jane Hogarth
        Region 5 Alternate
        [1]919-906-2106
        On Aug 15, 2018 at 5:39 PM, <[2]Caryn Ann Harlos> wrote:
        My point was that I know for a fact of candidate assistance he is
        doing.
        -Caryn Ann
        On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM Susan Hogarth via Lnc-business
        <[3][2]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
             I took a quick look at Smith’s fb page and it is indeed
     almost
          all
             about this.
             Most disturbing in light of all the this-is-not-a-purge talk
     is
          his
             featuring of this clearly pro-purge fanmail:
             [cid:6F811495-0D5B-4C23-AE16-0AFC39078BD6]
             Susan Jane Hogarth
             Region 5 Alternate
             [1]919-906-2106
             On Aug 15, 2018 at 5:14 PM, <[2]Caryn Ann Harlos via
          Lnc-business>
             wrote:
             I do a weekly fundraising drive for a candidate each week.
             If you are going to go to the trouble of counting emails, it
          would be
             nice if you went to the trouble of finding out things that
     don’t
          fit
             your narrative.  You could also do the same for Joshua.  He
     can
          speak
             to his own activities but I know for a fact that you
     caricature
          of him
             as only caring about this is woefully incorrect.
             By the time my promo schedule is done I will have raised as
          much.  We
             shouldn’t have to highlight our own candidacy efforts by
     putting
          other
             people’s efforts down.  That is a real issue in this Party.
             -Caryn Ann
             On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:02 PM Joe Bishop-Henchman via
          Lnc-business
             <[1][4][3]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
               I vote no.
               I oppose socialism, support property rights, and think
          syndicalists
               (to
               use a more precise term for them) are naive, wrong, and
          internally
               inconsistent. If one of their tiny number is a candidate
     for
          office
               in
               Michigan, I think it's fair if Michigan sought to expel
     them or
               remove
               them from the ballot. If one of them in a position of LNC
          authority
               espouses views advocating violence or destruction of
     individual
               rights,
               I think it's fair to consider censure or removal.
               Neither is the case here. This resolution either reaffirms
     our
               platform
               - using some odd language that throws Georgists and
     mutualists
          under
               the
               bus too - or it expands our platform and turns the LNC
     into a
          purity
               police of Libertarian beliefs.
               Mr. Olsen mentioned real instances of people hesitant
     about
          joining
               the
               party because of the rise of these syndicalists. That
     gives me
               pause. If
               I were talking to such a person, I'd point out our
     platform as
          it
               stands
               and let them know that the weirdo socialists couldn't even
     fill
          one
               Uber, let alone pose any threat to our party. Would such a
          person be
               more reassured by a "reaffirmed" Platform than the current
          Platform?
               Are
               our SoP and Platform so weak that this group has managed
     to
          shake
               the
               foundations of our Party?
               I encounter people all the time who aren't sure what the
          Libertarian
               Party stand for because of our various strains of thought
     and
          our
               inability to focus on electing candidates. A non-binding
          resolution
               doesn't fix that. It actually makes it worse - signalling
     that
          we
               the
               LNC can't keep our eye on electing candidates, or at least
     on
               promoting
               Libertarian solutions to the problems of the day.
               In the four days, Ms. Harlos has written and sent 68
     emails on
          this
               matter and Mr. Smith has posted 20 Facebook posts on this
          matter.
               They've decided this is their number one issue and want it
     to
          be the
               LNC's number one issue.
               If we're looking to demonstrate Libertarian relevance to
          voters, I
               would
               instead suggest one of the following could be our top item
     for
               discussion, action, or marketing this week:
               *China announces 25% tariffs on $60 billion worth of U.S.
          goods, in
               response to President Trump considering higher tariffs on
     $200
               billion
               worth of Chinese goods. The total negative effect of
     enacted
          and
               announced tariffs in this tariff war is 465,000 lost jobs
     and
          $150
               billion less in economic growth.
               *The U.S. Senate is poised to approve H.R. 6157, which
          increases
               Pentagon spending to $675 billion for this upcoming year.
     While
               federal
               spending is being boosted, the U.S. Treasury is expected
     to
          borrow
               $955
               billion this year, up from $519 billion last year.
               *$1.7 billion was spent on lobbying in Washington, DC in
     the
          first
               six
               months of this year, the highest since 2010. There are
     9,785
               registered
               lobbyists in the nation's capital, or 18 for each member
     of
               Congress.
               *Electric power was restored to the entire island of
     Puerto
          Rico
               today
               for the first time since Hurricane Maria hit 328 days ago,
     a
          woeful
               testament to the commonwealth's dependence on the federal
               government.
               *Wildfires continue to devastate northern California,
          destroying
               thousands of homes and claiming 31 lives. Regulations
     prohibit
               timber
               companies from clearing out dense forests and removing an
          estimated
               129
               million dead trees, leaving a tinder box.
               *50 schoolchildren on a field trip were killed and 80 were
          wounded
               in a
               Saudi airstrike in northern Yemen that hit their bus last
          Thursday.
               The
               victims were age 6 to 11. U.S. Secretary of State Pompeo,
     on
          the
               phone
               with the Saudi Crown Prince a few days later, thanked the
          Saudis for
               their help in Syria and Iraq.
               *President Trump revoked the security clearance of one
     official
          who
               has
               spoken out against him, and fired an FBI official who
     spoke out
               against
               him.
               *California's Supreme Court struck down San Diego's
     decision
               (approved
               by 65% of voters) to put city employees into a 401k
     retirement
          plan
               instead of an antiquated and costly defined benefit
     pension
          plan. In
               DC,
               the WMATA transit agency lost a similar arbitration
     dispute.
               Taxpayers
               will have to pick up the tab in both instances.
               *Socialist Venezuela today defaulted on another $1.125
     billion
          in
               bonds.
               Several dozen opposition figures have been rounded up for
               "questioning"
               following a drone assassination attempt on Maduro earlier
     this
               month.
               *New Zealand banned foreigners from buying property as a
     way of
               "solving" high housing prices. U.S. cities may look at the
     idea
               next.
               *North Dakota will vote on marijuana legalization, after
     LP
          activist
               Dave Owen and his org LegalizeND got the issue on the
     ballot
          this
               week.
               *And of course, our many great candidates who need
     donations,
               volunteers, and attention as they work to be elected and
          re-elected.
               Imagine how much money we could raise for them or
     activists we
          could
               get
               for them if we were e-mailing 68 times or posting 20
     Facebook
          posts
               about them instead?
               Relating to the last point, over the next few days I'm
     going to
               personally donate $68 each - one for each of Ms. Harlos's
          emails
               about
               socialist entryism in the last four days - to ten LP
     candidates
          in
               winnable or ballot-access-important races across the
     country,
          and
               publicizing it to my network to encourage others to give
     as
          well. If
               all
               27 of us were to do the same, that's an injection of
     $18,360
          and a
               clear
               demonstration that this LNC has its priorities in order.
     If all
          27
               of us
               were to get our networks to do the same, that may make the
               difference
               between winning and not winning. I welcome anyone joining
     me in
          this
               pledge, regardless of how they vote on this resolution.
               JBH
               ------------
               Joe Bishop-Henchman
               LNC Member (At-Large)
               [2][5][4]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
               [3][6][5]www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
               On 2018-08-15 05:56, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
     wrote:
               > We have an electronic mail ballot.
               >
               >    Votes are due to the LNC-Business list by July 22,
     2018 at
               > 11:59:59pm
               >    Pacific time.
               >
               >    Co-Sponsors:  Caryn Ann Harlos, Richard Longstreth,
     Steven
               Nekhaila,
               >    Justin O’Donnell, Joshua Smith
               >
               >    Motion: Move to adopt the following resolution:
               >
               >    WHEREAS, the Libertarian Party supports the free
     market
          and
               > therefore
               >    the right of privatization of property as an
     extension of
          the
               >    individual;
               >
               >    WHEREAS, the Statement of Principles of The
     Libertarian
          Party
               >    explicitly supports the right to private property
          ownership,
               > including
               >    the right to do business utilizing that property as
          capital;
               >
               >    WHEREAS, the Libertarian Party strongly supports the
          rights of
               >    individuals to own private property including land,
          structures,
               > natural
               >    resources and other private space through
     homesteading,
               purchase,
               > and
               >    other lawful libertarian means;
               >
               >    WHEREAS, ownership of private property, including but
     not
               limited to
               >    land and housing, does not require continual or
     personal
          use to
               > exist
               >    as justly owned property unless otherwise abandoned;
               >
               >    WHEREAS, these have been part of the principles of
     the
               Libertarian
               >    Party since its inception;
               >
               >    THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that socialist and
     communist
               property
               >    ownership schemes, including the collectivization of
          property,
               > unlawful
               >    usurpation of property, and incorrect
     characterizations of
               private
               >    property, unless otherwise voluntarily agreed by all
          parties,
               are
               >    incompatible with the philosophy of the Libertarian
     Party.
               >
               >    =============================================
               >
               >    Important Bylaws note:
               >
               >    Resolutions require passage by 3/4 vote as follows:
               >
               >    Article 7:
               >
               >    ***
               >
               >    The National Committee may adopt public policy
     resolutions
          by a
               ¾
               > vote
               >    with previous notice or by unanimous consent without
          previous
               > notice.
               >
               >    =============================================
               >
               >    You can keep track of the Secretary's manual tally of
          votes
               here:
               >    [1][4][7][6]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting.  Votes are
     noted
          with a
               link to
               > the
               >    actual ballot cast for verification. You can find the
     time
          that
               the
               >    manual tally was last updated at the bottom of the
     sheet.
               >
               >    Please notify me of any discrepancies.
               >    --
               >    In Liberty,
               >    Caryn Ann Harlos
               >    Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
          Secretary
               -
               >    [2]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
               >    Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
          LPedia at LP.org
               >    A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
               >    We defend your rights
               >    And oppose the use of force
               >    Taxation is theft
               >
               > References
               >
               >    1. [5][8][7]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
               >    2. mailto:[6]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
             --
             --
             In Liberty,
             Caryn Ann Harlos
             Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
     Secretary
             - [7]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
             Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
             A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
             We defend your rights
             And oppose the use of force
             Taxation is theft
          References
             1. mailto:[9][8]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
             2. mailto:[10][9]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
             3. [11][10]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
             4. [12][11]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
             5. [13][12]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
             6. mailto:[14]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
             7. mailto:[15]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
          References
             1. tel:919-906-2106
             2. mailto:[16][13]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
        --
        --
        In Liberty,
        Caryn Ann Harlos
        Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
        - [17]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
        Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
        A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
        We defend your rights
        And oppose the use of force
        Taxation is theft
     References
        1. tel:919-906-2106
        2. mailto:[14]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
        3. mailto:[15]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
        4. mailto:[16]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
        5. mailto:[17]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
        6. [18]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
        7. [19]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
        8. [20]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
        9. mailto:[21]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       10. mailto:[22]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
       11. [23]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
       12. [24]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       13. [25]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       14. mailto:[26]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
       15. mailto:[27]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
       16. mailto:[28]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       17. mailto:[29]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org

   --

   --
   In Liberty,
   Caryn Ann Harlos
   Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
   - [30]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
   Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
   A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
   We defend your rights
   And oppose the use of force
   Taxation is theft

References

   1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   2. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   3. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   4. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
   5. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
   6. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
   7. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
   8. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   9. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
  10. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
  11. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  12. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  13. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  14. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
  15. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  16. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  17. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
  18. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
  19. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  20. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  21. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  22. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
  23. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
  24. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  25. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  26. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
  27. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
  28. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  29. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
  30. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org


More information about the Lnc-business mailing list